LSAC f**ked up on PT1-S3-Q2

User avatar
Nulli Secundus
Posts: 2625
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am

Re: LSAC fucked up on PT1-S3-Q2

Postby Nulli Secundus » Thu Jan 15, 2015 8:12 am

I<3ScholarlySweets! wrote:Invalid statements cannot be considered reasoning alone--that is an abuse of language. If a statement is invalid, you must use "flawed" to modify "reasononing" which is equivalent to: "A statement that is invalid."


Nope since "reasononing" is not a word, if you modify it with "flawed", you would only be describing the current situation accurately. Reasononing is indeed flawed.

I<3ScholarlySweets!
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 10:56 pm

Re: LSAC fucked up on PT1-S3-Q2

Postby I<3ScholarlySweets! » Thu Jan 15, 2015 11:56 pm

LJL at you making fun, and condescending, my typo. Are you a poli-sci shithead?

ilikebaseball
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: LSAC fucked up on PT1-S3-Q2

Postby ilikebaseball » Thu Jan 15, 2015 11:57 pm

I<3ScholarlySweets! wrote:LJL at you making fun, and condescending, my typo. Are you a poli-sci shithead?

ya he's being condescending

User avatar
stray
Posts: 213
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:18 pm

Re: LSAC fucked up on PT1-S3-Q2

Postby stray » Thu Jan 15, 2015 11:59 pm

=
Last edited by stray on Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

03152016
Posts: 9189
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: LSAC fucked up on PT1-S3-Q2

Postby 03152016 » Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:04 am

I<3ScholarlySweets! wrote:Invalid statements cannot be considered reasoning alone--that is an abuse of language. If a statement is invalid, you must use "flawed" to modify "reasononing" which is equivalent to: "A statement that is invalid."

well you sure convinced me

I<3ScholarlySweets!
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 10:56 pm

Re: LSAC fucked up on PT1-S3-Q2

Postby I<3ScholarlySweets! » Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:07 am

stray, are you dense?

I<3ScholarlySweets!
Posts: 279
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2014 10:56 pm

Re: LSAC fucked up on PT1-S3-Q2

Postby I<3ScholarlySweets! » Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:12 am

Nice edit, stray!

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse
Posts: 22813
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: LSAC fucked up on PT1-S3-Q2

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:16 am

Stop. If you're not willing to listen to others' opinions and just want to show how smart you are, don't post.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: addie1412, batlaw, bearedman8, blackmamba8, dontsaywhatyoumean, KillaKam92, laqueredup, neptunian and 16 guests