Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated? Forum
-
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:26 am
Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Some of the questions kind of have a different feel to them.
- stray
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:18 pm
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Yea, they are useful. Sure, they are somewhat different in small ways (some of the games are pretty weird, and there are minor differences in the style of LR), but much of it is the same. If you have time, def use all of them (including 1-18).
-
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
The LR and RC is useful. The only change in the LR is that now there aren't "double" stimulus' (stimulus that account for 2 questions in a row).
LG seems much different and easier. But, IMHO, all of it is useful. Create good habits, and drill questions you've never seen before. Its better to do that than drill 50's PTs that you've already seen
LG seems much different and easier. But, IMHO, all of it is useful. Create good habits, and drill questions you've never seen before. Its better to do that than drill 50's PTs that you've already seen
- DrSpaceman
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 2:55 pm
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Definitely still valuable. Anything that stretches your logic engine is good practice. Besides, some of the recent LG sections have thrown old-school curveballs anyway.
- Clyde Frog
- Posts: 8985
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:27 am
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Everything is useful. Don't neglect the old LG games! Outdated games are appearing more and more in recent tests.
- ChemEng1642
- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2014 7:26 pm
Re: Are tests 19-28 useful to study or too outdated?
Useful for drilling
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login