No drop in Dec takers Forum
- Bigfish41
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 4:52 pm
No drop in Dec takers
http://www.lsac.org/lsacresources/data/ ... ministered
There was no drop in dec takers this year. Around how many people do you guys think this year's cycle would comprise of? Less than 100k?
There was no drop in dec takers this year. Around how many people do you guys think this year's cycle would comprise of? Less than 100k?
- nlee10
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:00 pm
Re: No drop in Dec takers
It's hard to speculate whether there was really no drop in Dec takers. There was a huge winter storm last Dec test (Dec 2013) which caused a lot of people to postponed till Feb.
Even then, the drops from June and Sept are each down like 8/9%. In addition, according to Spivey consulting, applicants/applications are down 9/11% as of 1/2/15.
Even then, the drops from June and Sept are each down like 8/9%. In addition, according to Spivey consulting, applicants/applications are down 9/11% as of 1/2/15.
-
- Posts: 115
- Joined: Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:32 pm
Re: No drop in Dec takers
Many of the December folks were retakers from September. That test was unexpectedly tricky and people did worse than they had expected to do.
-
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:05 am
Re: No drop in Dec takers
I think a big part of it too is that with the changing admissions game....those who are interested in law school still are finding that taking the December LSAT is not as far behind in the admissions cycle as it used to be in past years.
Overall still less applicants than Fall 2014 admissions cycle, so my 2 cents is that a December take is not as disadvantageous as in the past and with applicants even thinking of taking the Feb LSAT for that same fall's admissions which wouldn't have happened as much in the past
Overall still less applicants than Fall 2014 admissions cycle, so my 2 cents is that a December take is not as disadvantageous as in the past and with applicants even thinking of taking the Feb LSAT for that same fall's admissions which wouldn't have happened as much in the past
- TheodoreKGB
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 3:46 pm
Re: No drop in Dec takers
.
Last edited by TheodoreKGB on Mon Mar 16, 2015 12:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bpolley0
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 6:59 pm
Re: No drop in Dec takers
What do you mean upper score bands are way down? Any proof? Wouldn't that also change the percentile of your score?
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: No drop in Dec takers
Change from last cycle as of January 2nd:bpolley0 wrote:What do you mean upper score bands are way down? Any proof? Wouldn't that also change the percentile of your score?
Sources: http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/law-sc ... t-of-2015/
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... g/htmlview#
& no change in percentile. That has to do with scoring and is a separate issue from number and caliber of applicants.
- bpolley0
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2014 6:59 pm
Re: No drop in Dec takers
Understood, thank you for the data. I guess one question to ask would be: if individuals who are scoring higher on the LSAT are opting out of law school then ultimately, if you were to attend, the supply of individuals who are more likely to succeed in law, if you of course believe the LSAT is an indicator of your ability to succeed in law, will be down; thus, giving you less competition and more of a chance to succeed if you are one of those individuals who actually scored relatively high.
That is obviously just one thing to think about.
That is obviously just one thing to think about.