PT35,S1,Q23

179orBust
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 12:57 am

PT35,S1,Q23

Postby 179orBust » Fri Dec 26, 2014 10:54 am

This question killed me. Can someone please explain the incorrect answer choices, specifically D? Not fully comprehending that answer choice.TIA

User avatar
Dave Hall
Posts: 576
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:18 pm

Re: PT35,S1,Q23

Postby Dave Hall » Fri Dec 26, 2014 2:12 pm

Yeah, this was a tough question.

As is normally the case, I think you'll find this easier to deal with by concentrating on what the argument did wrong; in other words, why the right answer is right. We'll start there.

This argument is exactly the same as one that says: "Some dummies claim that the fastest way from the top of the Empire State building down to 5th Ave is a quick leap over the fence around the observation deck. However, such a leap would kill you, so that cannot be the fastest way down."

Obviously, whether or not the suggested leads to death has no bearing whatsoever on how fast the route is. Death is a convincing argument against that being the safest route, or the funnest route, or the preferred route, but it just cannot tell us whether it's the fastest route.

In the same way, that the statisticians' suggestion would lead to death does not argue against whether it is or isn't the surest way to increase your belief set correctness. Here again, the possibility of death is a persuasive stance against the preferability of their suggestion, but it simply doesn't speak to whether or not the suggestion offers the surest way to correctness.

Maybe the simplest way of seeing why (D) is incorrect is to notice that the arguer made no mention whatsoever of what kinds of beliefs we need in order to survive. So she hasn't assumed that we need to accept some beliefs "related to survival" any more than she's assumed we need to accept some beliefs "related to the Philadelphia Eagles." (D) is not a necessary assumption of the argument and does not therefore describe a way in which the argument is flawed.

I hope this helps; I'd be happy to discuss it further if you'd like.

179orBust
Posts: 218
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 12:57 am

Re: PT35,S1,Q23

Postby 179orBust » Fri Dec 26, 2014 4:20 pm

Thanks Dave! Awesome explanation and great analogy.
Also, I watched the explanation on your website and it was both terrific and entertaining. Thanks again for your help.

User avatar
Dave Hall
Posts: 576
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:18 pm

Re: PT35,S1,Q23

Postby Dave Hall » Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:17 pm

Awesome. Thanks for those kind words! Please let me know if I can help you to 179 and NOT BUST.

User avatar
NL2424
Posts: 1283
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2014 1:12 pm

Re: PT35,S1,Q23

Postby NL2424 » Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:19 pm

..
Last edited by NL2424 on Fri Jul 10, 2015 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dave Hall
Posts: 576
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:18 pm

Re: PT35,S1,Q23

Postby Dave Hall » Mon Dec 29, 2014 8:27 pm

Yeah; it's not fun, and it's nice to know you're not alone, right? I hope questions like these make you want to kick the LSAT hard in the junk. It's good inspiration: DO NOT FUCK WITH ME, LSAT. I'LL STOMP YOU. LIKE NDAMUKONG SUH.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bcapace, clueless801 and 11 guests