Hello
I was confused on the setup for this game and the inferences
I don't feel like I got a very good grasp of this particular game
Thanks
Logic Games PT 3 Game 4
-
MattM
- Posts: 282
- Joined: Thu Jun 19, 2014 11:05 am
Re: Logic Games PT 3 Game 4
Bump.....definitely a good game for people to go over before LSAT.
If noting else it reminds you not to make silly assumptions you have based off of other logic games
tricky rules in this game
If noting else it reminds you not to make silly assumptions you have based off of other logic games
tricky rules in this game
-
Dave Hall
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Re: Logic Games PT 3 Game 4
You've got it—this is a great example of how the games section has systematized over the years. Not all the things we've learned about how the test writers construct modern games necessarily apply to these old-ass games.
Still, as you've said, our main job is to follow the rules. When we're told that all three pilots are in the air, and that no plane flies without a pilot, then we've got at most three planes in the air.
The worst part is how easy it is to assume that you've only got one pilot—or only one co-pilot—in each plane! THOSE BASTARDS.
Keeping in mind the possibility that we bunch our pilots and co-pilots in unexpected ways, I found success using a multi-row ordering diagram:
Still, as you've said, our main job is to follow the rules. When we're told that all three pilots are in the air, and that no plane flies without a pilot, then we've got at most three planes in the air.
The worst part is how easy it is to assume that you've only got one pilot—or only one co-pilot—in each plane! THOSE BASTARDS.
Keeping in mind the possibility that we bunch our pilots and co-pilots in unexpected ways, I found success using a multi-row ordering diagram:
-
Dave Hall
- Posts: 583
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Re: Logic Games PT 3 Game 4
Got it. Thanks, Steve.