Feb 99 Hardest LSAT Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by BillsFan9907 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 8:49 pm

Just took the February 1999 test, otherwise known as preptest B or 20.5. It had a -4 curve for getting a 180!!! Has there ever been a harder or equally hard test?

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by Colonel_funkadunk » Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:09 pm

Seoulless wrote:Just took the February 1999 test, otherwise known as preptest B or 20.5. It had a -4 curve for getting a 180!!! Has there ever been a harder or equally hard test?
I mean I think some of the tests w the -8 or -9 curve to get a 170 are just as hard to get a similar score to PT B which has a -15 curve. It's all relative

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Post by Gray » Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:18 pm

.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by Colonel_funkadunk » Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:31 pm

Holy grey is an LSAT prodigy.

Yea but B is nbd

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Post by Gray » Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:33 pm

.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by Colonel_funkadunk » Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:38 pm

Sup grey looks like we found another thread to chatter in

User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by BillPackets » Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:50 pm

Sup bill is in the party too

User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by BillPackets » Thu Sep 11, 2014 9:54 pm

IMHO this test was pretty hard idc what colonel says oh it's all relative yeah sure but that necessary assumption q bout tillage was basically a riddle

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by Colonel_funkadunk » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:06 pm

If I hear u say riddle one more time

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by BillPackets » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:14 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote: riddle

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Post by Gray » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:18 pm

.

03152016

Platinum
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by 03152016 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:32 pm

the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so

the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line

BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by BillsFan9907 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:41 pm

smccgrey wrote:Personally I found it super easy... I'm sure the curve had something to do with it. I have extolled the virtues of Superprep B in the September thread.
Really? What have u said?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by BillPackets » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:44 pm

Seoulless wrote:
smccgrey wrote:Personally I found it super easy... I'm sure the curve had something to do with it. I have extolled the virtues of Superprep B in the September thread.
Really? What have u said?
It was her second PT n she 178ed it like it's nbd

BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by BillsFan9907 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:50 pm

Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so

the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line

Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.

User avatar
w0w

Silver
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by w0w » Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:56 pm

smccgrey wrote:
BillPackets wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote: riddle


Sorry Seoulless... I hope we answered your question adequately before derailing this thread.

I think Superprep B has a -15 170, and I've seen a couple with -14 170. Don't think that makes it harder though.

I think last oct or dec was a -14.

User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by BillPackets » Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:14 pm

Seoulless wrote:
Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so

the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line

Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
Idk I set it up as an octagon. Setting up circular games linearly throws me off. I thought the contrapositives of the second game with biconditionals in the necessary was weird. Threw me off

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


03152016

Platinum
Posts: 9180
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by 03152016 » Thu Sep 11, 2014 11:20 pm

BillPackets wrote:
Seoulless wrote:
Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so

the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line

Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
Idk I set it up as an octagon. Setting up circular games linearly throws me off. I thought the contrapositives of the second game with biconditionals in the necessary was weird. Threw me off
the game places elements in a linear way (using numbers)
if all the rules were relative a table setup would work better
that's a good rule of thumb, not that you'll likely see a table game ever again or anything

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: Feb 99 Hardest LSAT

Post by Rigo » Fri Sep 12, 2014 12:26 am

Brut wrote:
BillPackets wrote:
Seoulless wrote:
Brut wrote:the games are pretty tough
but not unreasonably so

the table game tends to throw people off
they usually set it up like a table
but it's better as a number line

Yes absolutely. No reason not to treat it like a linear game... Just remember that 1 and 8 are next to each other.
Idk I set it up as an octagon. Setting up circular games linearly throws me off. I thought the contrapositives of the second game with biconditionals in the necessary was weird. Threw me off
the game places elements in a linear way (using numbers)
if all the rules were relative a table setup would work better
that's a good rule of thumb, not that you'll likely see a table game ever again or anything
Hope not. I'm a weirdo who finds circle games so fun for some odd reason. Much prefer them to pattern games of the other miscellaneous ones.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”