February 2014 Waiters

How will you celebrate - slash - wallow in despair after score release? (select all that apply)

I shall drink a great many alcohols!
30
25%
I'm going to finally SLEEP.
14
11%
I'm going to get sexed something crazy.
14
11%
No time for celebration -- MUST STRESS OVER APPLICASHUNS!
9
7%
I'll console myself with logic games.
4
3%
Eat. So much.
13
11%
Celebratory/Numb-the-Pain shopping!
10
8%
Finally stop avoiding my family and their constant questions!
13
11%
Cracker Barrel. (this one's basically here just so I can select it.)
15
12%
 
Total votes: 122

almostperfect
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:51 am

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby almostperfect » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:15 pm

adela004 wrote:Gah... So the circle was in the LSATs that only had 1 LG??? Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

:(

Now I have to decide if I want to cancel my score or ride it out and hope the curve is beyond generous.....
.....and LG is my weakest area too. It's like the odds are totally stacked against me ;.;



So was that the same one with the cities and the individuals working in diff departments?

User avatar
90convoy
Posts: 918
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby 90convoy » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:16 pm

Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:I had 2 RCs (one was impossible), two LRs, and one games (very tough).


I had 1 RC. It was hard as fuck

adela004
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:55 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby adela004 » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:16 pm

almostperfect wrote:
adela004 wrote:Gah... So the circle was in the LSATs that only had 1 LG??? Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

:(

Now I have to decide if I want to cancel my score or ride it out and hope the curve is beyond generous.....
.....and LG is my weakest area too. It's like the odds are totally stacked against me ;.;



So was that the same one with the cities and the individuals working in diff departments?



Yes.

adela004
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:55 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby adela004 » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:17 pm

90convoy wrote:
Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:I had 2 RCs (one was impossible), two LRs, and one games (very tough).


I had 1 RC. It was hard as fuck



wait I thought you had 1 LG?

User avatar
PattyCake
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby PattyCake » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:18 pm

Had opposite prob with LG. Circle game was the only one I felt good about in the section. Art installations can jump of a cliff and burst into flames. Same with department store employees. And my experimental LG? DESTROYED it!!! Why?!?! If you'd asked me after section 4 I'd have said I was getting a 165+. After LG I'll be thrilled with a 159.

User avatar
90convoy
Posts: 918
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby 90convoy » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:18 pm

adela004 wrote:
90convoy wrote:
Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:I had 2 RCs (one was impossible), two LRs, and one games (very tough).


I had 1 RC. It was hard as fuck



wait I thought you had 1 LG?


I did. I had 1 of both

adela004
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:55 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby adela004 » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:18 pm

90convoy wrote:
adela004 wrote:
90convoy wrote:
Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:I had 2 RCs (one was impossible), two LRs, and one games (very tough).


I had 1 RC. It was hard as fuck



wait I thought you had 1 LG?


I did. I had 1 of both



...damnit

ballsoharduniversity
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby ballsoharduniversity » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:19 pm

That 15 min break ruined my flow. I was def struggling more on the 2nd LR for whatever reason. The first LR seemed pretty alright. I just hope that I killed it on all the other sections to make up for LG

User avatar
PattyCake
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby PattyCake » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:22 pm

generalmead wrote:I had RC LR LG LR LG

Thoughts: RC little tougher than average, LR normal (if anything slighter easier than average). The two LG were POLAR opposites. First one was one of the easiest I've ever seen (finished with 10 minutes left) and second one was pretty damn tough. I was sweating bullets when I realized I had taken too long on the first game and I had to guess on the last question of the section. My guess is that the more difficult one counted. Hoping, though, that it boosts the curve to at least a -12.


Exactly! I had 5 or 10 minutes after first LG, second one was just... Just... Sigh. And it def counted.

User avatar
sanibella
Posts: 430
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:29 am

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby sanibella » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:23 pm

e
Last edited by sanibella on Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ballsoharduniversity
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby ballsoharduniversity » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:23 pm

sanibella wrote:Anyone with no LR experimental remember a question involving teddy bears?


Yes

User avatar
PattyCake
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby PattyCake » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:24 pm

adela004 wrote:
I had RC LR LG LR LG
Thoughts: RC little tougher than average, LR normal (if anything slighter easier than average). The two LG were POLAR opposites. First one was one of the easiest I've ever seen (finished with 10 minutes left) and second one was pretty damn tough. I was sweating bullets when I realized I had taken too long on the first game and I had to guess on the last question of the section. My guess is that the more difficult one counted. Hoping, though, that it boosts the curve to at least a -12.



I had the same setup... I thought I did really well until I got to the final LG section and it obliterated me.
The first LG felt easy or at least doable.

Isn't the experimental section typically harder than the regular versions? I'm really hoping the final LG, since it was so hard, was the experimental section. But then again wouldn't this be the first time the final 5th section is actually the experimental section?


Fairly certain experimental is always in the first 3 sections, but it doesn't matter because people with one game had the circle game so it's real.

User avatar
bryanjbay12
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:25 am

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby bryanjbay12 » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:24 pm

ballsoharduniversity wrote:
sanibella wrote:Anyone with no LR experimental remember a question involving teddy bears?


Yes


Was that last?

User avatar
PattyCake
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby PattyCake » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:25 pm

bryanjbay12 wrote:
generalmead wrote:
xylocarp wrote:Can anyone help with experimental LR? The section I want to be real had one set of answers all about Brenda's kittens and puppies


Yes, that was real.


Was that the first one or the third?

Third.

User avatar
sanibella
Posts: 430
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:29 am

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby sanibella » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:26 pm

Okay, awesome.
Last edited by sanibella on Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ballsoharduniversity
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:12 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby ballsoharduniversity » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:26 pm

sanibella wrote:Okay, awesome. And how about involving nutritional deficiencies and and social programs?


That one is real too, third section/second LR (pretty sure)

User avatar
PattyCake
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby PattyCake » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:27 pm

sanibella wrote:Anyone with no LR experimental remember a question involving teddy bears?

Yup. Real.

almostperfect
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 9:51 am

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby almostperfect » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:27 pm

sanibella wrote:Okay, awesome. And how about involving nutritional deficiencies and and social programs?



Yea thats real

User avatar
PattyCake
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby PattyCake » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:27 pm

sanibella wrote:Okay, awesome. And how about involving nutritional deficiencies and and social programs?

Real.

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton
Posts: 5417
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby Mack.Hambleton » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:28 pm

,
Last edited by Mack.Hambleton on Wed May 07, 2014 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

Geometricconfusion
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:21 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby Geometricconfusion » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:28 pm

Hey y'all.

I had 2 lg... First one was hard, second one was decent. Second 1 had the circle delegates which I found easy, found the city worker one harder. Reading comp was brutallllllllll

User avatar
PattyCake
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby PattyCake » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:29 pm

james.bungles wrote:was the real RC wampum or physics bullshit?

Experimental must be wampum because I only had one RC and no wampum.

jd2121
Posts: 28
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 2:24 am

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby jd2121 » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:29 pm

bryanjbay12 wrote:
BankruptMe wrote:
W$RKliveWELL wrote:Everything everyone else said. LR RC LR LG LR. Deff think the first LR was experimental second was a cake walk thurs was moderate. RC was hard that scientific passage I was like wtf am I reading. Games deff the one with the countries counted. Last game was hard barely pushed through it. Let's all play for a generous generous curve.



As soon as I saw the table game i was like......fuck

I started RC with science and worked back. I think that was stupid in hindsight if i blew the passage. Took 10 mins. smh


RC was a blur for me. Don't remember anything besides the first passage which I thought was easy. After that, I dont even know what happened. Seemed really hard to me. Also my worst section though.



dude this is exactly what happened to me. i found the rc to be ridiculously hard. and the 4th logic was a joke

10052014
Posts: 590
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 11:12 am

.

Postby 10052014 » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:31 pm

.
Last edited by 10052014 on Sat Oct 04, 2014 11:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
PattyCake
Posts: 440
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm

Re: February 2014 Waiters

Postby PattyCake » Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:31 pm

Geometricconfusion wrote:Hey y'all.

I had 2 lg... First one was hard, second one was decent. Second 1 had the circle delegates which I found easy, found the city worker one harder. Reading comp was brutallllllllll


Yeah circle was easy if the circle itself didn't mess you up. The others ate my brain for breakfast.
Last edited by PattyCake on Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Vino.Veritas and 4 guests