February 2014 Waiters Forum
- Nucky
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:26 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
This was my third attempt. I predict something in the 160s. Not sure where. Probably 163-166 if I'm being realistic... So it's either run with it or sit out two years.
Don't think I can sit two years with my fingers crossed so this is it for me. Fingers will certainly be crossed for the next month or so though.
I bet we all did better than we think. Test was definitely seemed a bit off pace though.
Don't think I can sit two years with my fingers crossed so this is it for me. Fingers will certainly be crossed for the next month or so though.
I bet we all did better than we think. Test was definitely seemed a bit off pace though.
-
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 12:18 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I can't remember what exact questions were asked, but I remember my LR sections had 26,25, and 26 questions.
Anyone know which section was experimental?
Sorry if I'm breaking rules...
Anyone know which section was experimental?
Sorry if I'm breaking rules...
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:09 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I'm pretty sure three was experimental. Could be wrong though.LR-RC-LR-LG-LR FWIW
- PattyCake
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I've already gotten into a bunch of schools, some with $. Not my first choice though, haven't heard from them yet. Now I'm pretty sure it'll be a rejection, and if by some miracle they accept me I still won't be able to go because I DEF won't get $. I can't go anywhere without a huge scholarship.BankruptMe wrote:So what now...are you going to apply?PattyCake wrote:Seriously. If you'd asked me after section 4 I'd have guessed I was getting a 165+. I think I might have actually gotten more wrong than right for LG, and I was PREPARED for LG this time. I'm furious, because I suspect I will be below 160 again, after multiple PT's at or above 170. So much work, and I can't take it again.alecks wrote:Ughhhhhh the circle game. I want to cry forever, I only have one administration left before I can't take the LSAT anymore. I had to guess on more than a few questions... But I can't remember now. I'm almost positive I got like a 155.
I'm crushed. 6 months of work. For a crap score.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 12:40 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I really hope so.Nucky wrote:This was my third attempt. I predict something in the 160s. Not sure where. Probably 163-166 if I'm being realistic... So it's either run with it or sit out two years.
Don't think I can sit two years with my fingers crossed so this is it for me. Fingers will certainly be crossed for the next month or so though.
I bet we all did better than we think. Test was definitely seemed a bit off pace though.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
They might as well extend it further….the way things are going (this LSAT stuff), they won't be able to fill there class with 160+ that easily.Epitome wrote:One of top regional schools I'd be happy to attend extended their dead line so that they will accept June scores for this year. So there is always that. Sigh.
- PattyCake
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
+1Epitome wrote:I really hope so.Nucky wrote:This was my third attempt. I predict something in the 160s. Not sure where. Probably 163-166 if I'm being realistic... So it's either run with it or sit out two years.
Don't think I can sit two years with my fingers crossed so this is it for me. Fingers will certainly be crossed for the next month or so though.
I bet we all did better than we think. Test was definitely seemed a bit off pace though.
- BankruptMe
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
A lot of regionals, and major state unis("University of _________") Have decided to accept june scores. There just arent enough applicants in general. Some schools apps have dropped by 50%!
- bryanjbay12
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:25 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Fairly sure LR1 was the experimentalRobertGolddust wrote:I'm pretty sure three was experimental. Could be wrong though.LR-RC-LR-LG-LR FWIW
- BankruptMe
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Though this may not apply to LSAT, I was taking an upper level economics final. I was THE LAST person in the room. For like 15 mins alone and the prof was just staring at me. I thought that I had failed or got a C-D. I thought I royally screwed up the test.Epitome wrote:I really hope so.Nucky wrote:This was my third attempt. I predict something in the 160s. Not sure where. Probably 163-166 if I'm being realistic... So it's either run with it or sit out two years.
Don't think I can sit two years with my fingers crossed so this is it for me. Fingers will certainly be crossed for the next month or so though.
I bet we all did better than we think. Test was definitely seemed a bit off pace though.
I got a 98, highest grade out of like 50 students. So sometimes assuming you did bad may not be bad.
I dont know....I am just trying to comfort myself. lmao
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Well, T14 needs to extend theirs as well.BankruptMe wrote:A lot of regionals, and major state unis("University of _________") Have decided to accept june scores. There just arent enough applicants in general. Some schools apps have dropped by 50%!
-
- Posts: 5215
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:16 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
TITCRbryanjbay12 wrote:Fairly sure LR1 was the experimentalRobertGolddust wrote:I'm pretty sure three was experimental. Could be wrong though.LR-RC-LR-LG-LR FWIW
Last edited by xylocarp on Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Nucky
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:26 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I don't know about you guys but I often found that in my PTs, the one's I thought I killed I did poorly one(by my standards) and vice versa.
So maybe our uneasy feelings are a good thing. My best PTs were after tests I didn't feel great about... Of course, it was nice to be able to grade them right away.
So maybe our uneasy feelings are a good thing. My best PTs were after tests I didn't feel great about... Of course, it was nice to be able to grade them right away.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nucky
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:26 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
How can you tell? I don't think anyone knows for sure. This was my third and I knew it had to be one of the first two due to the 25Q/25Q split but they were both easy.xylocarp wrote:TITCRbryanjbay12 wrote:Fairly sure LR1 was the experimentalRobertGolddust wrote:I'm pretty sure three was experimental. Could be wrong though.LR-RC-LR-LG-LR FWIW
- Trey is Wilson
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 6:00 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I didn't find the circle game to be that hard. I thought the test was reasonable.
-
- Posts: 5215
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:16 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Because people who didn't have LR experimental remember questions from sections 3 and 5 but not 1.Nucky wrote:How can you tell? I don't think anyone knows for sure. This was my third and I knew it had to be one of the first two due to the 25Q/25Q split but they were both easy.xylocarp wrote:TITCRbryanjbay12 wrote:Fairly sure LR1 was the experimentalRobertGolddust wrote:
I'm pretty sure three was experimental. Could be wrong though.
Last edited by xylocarp on Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2014 12:40 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
ITAMiracle wrote:Well, T14 needs to extend theirs as well.BankruptMe wrote:A lot of regionals, and major state unis("University of _________") Have decided to accept june scores. There just arent enough applicants in general. Some schools apps have dropped by 50%!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Dekal2009
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 11:54 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Glad to hear that everyone test was (generally) okay. They cancelled mines in TN due to inclement weather...I guess I get to use my december score from 2012
- PattyCake
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I agree, but not when a LG section screws with you. The best part about LG is that you know how you're doing WHILE you're doing it. No one is ever like, "I'm not sure how I did on LG" because if you diagram it correctly you know you're on track as soon as you see the questions. If you're not you can tell, at least in my experience. Which by now literally includes every single published lsat. Fml.Nucky wrote:I don't know about you guys but I often found that in my PTs, the one's I thought I killed I did poorly one(by my standards) and vice versa.
So maybe our uneasy feelings are a good thing. My best PTs were after tests I didn't feel great about... Of course, it was nice to be able to grade them right away.
- bryanjbay12
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 8:25 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Fairly sure LR1 was the experimental[/quote]
TITCR[/quote]
How can you tell? I don't think anyone knows for sure. This was my third and I knew it had to be one of the first two due to the 25Q/25Q split but they were both easy.[/quote]
Because people who didn't have LR experimental remember questions from sections 3 and 5 but not 1.[/quote]
The first LR was 26Qs by the way. The second was 25Qs and the third was 26
TITCR[/quote]
How can you tell? I don't think anyone knows for sure. This was my third and I knew it had to be one of the first two due to the 25Q/25Q split but they were both easy.[/quote]
Because people who didn't have LR experimental remember questions from sections 3 and 5 but not 1.[/quote]
The first LR was 26Qs by the way. The second was 25Qs and the third was 26
- PattyCake
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
You'll have a retake option in 2 weeks, or a "free" June test.Dekal2009 wrote:Glad to hear that everyone test was (generally) okay. They cancelled mines in TN due to inclement weather...I guess I get to use my december score from 2012
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
It was more like "woah, hold up. ...OKAY, I got this." (Then I ran out of time.)Trey is Wilson wrote:I didn't find the circle game to be that hard. I thought the test was reasonable.
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I randomly guessed on one question, ran out of time and missed two more, then probably made a few stupid mistakes. Expecting it to be -7 or -8 which is a few more wrong than usual (usually not running out of time, sigh).PattyCake wrote:I agree, but not when a LG section screws with you. The best part about LG is that you know how you're doing WHILE you're doing it. No one is ever like, "I'm not sure how I did on LG" because if you diagram it correctly you know you're on track as soon as you see the questions. If you're not you can tell, at least in my experience. Which by now literally includes every single published lsat. Fml.Nucky wrote:I don't know about you guys but I often found that in my PTs, the one's I thought I killed I did poorly one(by my standards) and vice versa.
So maybe our uneasy feelings are a good thing. My best PTs were after tests I didn't feel great about... Of course, it was nice to be able to grade them right away.
- PattyCake
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I think I did ok on (?) city workers (honestly don't remember the premise but it was the first game in the section). Maybe not. Department store employees I barely got through, guessed last 2 after narrowing down to 2 choices because I was behind and then never got back to them so maybe 2 or 3 wrong IF I got the other ones right. Art installations. Basically f*ck you, art installations. Circle game no problem. I'm guessing -10 to -12, so bye bye 160+ for me.Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:I randomly guessed on one question, ran out of time and missed two more, then probably made a few stupid mistakes. Expecting it to be -7 or -8 which is a few more wrong than usual (usually not running out of time, sigh).PattyCake wrote:I agree, but not when a LG section screws with you. The best part about LG is that you know how you're doing WHILE you're doing it. No one is ever like, "I'm not sure how I did on LG" because if you diagram it correctly you know you're on track as soon as you see the questions. If you're not you can tell, at least in my experience. Which by now literally includes every single published lsat. Fml.Nucky wrote:I don't know about you guys but I often found that in my PTs, the one's I thought I killed I did poorly one(by my standards) and vice versa.
So maybe our uneasy feelings are a good thing. My best PTs were after tests I didn't feel great about... Of course, it was nice to be able to grade them right away.
- Trey is Wilson
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 6:00 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
ya just had to take a second to figure out how to translate my diagram to a linear answer, if that makes sense.Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:It was more like "woah, hold up. ...OKAY, I got this." (Then I ran out of time.)Trey is Wilson wrote:I didn't find the circle game to be that hard. I thought the test was reasonable.
I fortunately was able to get to all the problems in that section.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login