February 2014 Waiters Forum

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:36 pm

Post removed.

jmjm · Post by **jmjm** » Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:36 pm

PattyCake wrote:
orangemochafrapp wrote:I had RC LR RC LR LG

Can any confirm what the experimental section was for RC? I'm thinking music is a great way to experiment.
Women's rights/physics theory/sports/common law. Real. Thought all but physics was easy.

Pretty sure that women's rights and common law passages have appeared in previous PTs.

logicfreak · Post by **logicfreak** » Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:38 pm

PourMeTea wrote:They need to be from P.F. Chang's actually

do you look anything like kelly kapowski?? if so, please PM me.

thanks.

10052014 · Post by **10052014** » Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:59 pm

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:12 am

Post removed.

Baby_Got_Feuerbach · Post by **Baby_Got_Feuerbach** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:18 am

PourMeTea wrote:
logicfreak wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:They need to be from P.F. Chang's actually

do you look anything like kelly kapowski?? if so, please PM me.

thanks.
I look like Zack Morris, actually.

Oops sorry, wrong account, I'm the Zack Morris look alike.

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:24 am

Checking in.

I'm not a waiter.

But checking in for the support.

Hi, waiters.

thevuch · Post by **thevuch** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:25 am

PourMeTea wrote:
logicfreak wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:They need to be from P.F. Chang's actually

do you look anything like kelly kapowski?? if so, please PM me.

thanks.
I look like Zack Morris, actually.

Lololol .... Saw your earlier post tea! Good to see such confidence. I hope you get your 180.

I had LR RC LR LG LR have no freaking clue which one was exp. I will say the games weren't cake but they weren't crazy difficult. I think the last game was tricky I guess, I didn't really see it as the prompt described it tho for my purposes it was rather basic if that makes sense. I think I'll be satisfied with my score. RC was reasonable kinda more difficult and the LR was not the easiest but not the best. And te games weren't outrageous just not cake like 70 or 71. I could see -12-13 but I could also see -9 -10 not to dash dreams but after taking 25+ practice tests this thing wasn't that unusual

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:28 am

Post removed.

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:34 am

PourMeTea wrote:Hope you hit your score, vuch. I had the same setup!

& hi, wtrc. Good to see you back in this forum.

Thanks, PourMeTea! I hope the test went well for you.

Baby_Got_Feuerbach · Post by **Baby_Got_Feuerbach** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:36 am

wtrc wrote:Checking in.

I'm not a waiter.

But checking in for the support.

Hi, waiters.

I'll bump anyone who rocks a Gnome avatar.

haus · Post by **haus** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:37 am

My post LSAT fortune cookie fortune:

You are a happy man.

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:42 am

Post removed.

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:43 am

PourMeTea wrote:
Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:
wtrc wrote:Checking in.

I'm not a waiter.

But checking in for the support.

Hi, waiters.
I'll bump anyone who rocks a Gnome avatar.
I don't get the joke

I think gnome = Noam

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:44 am

Post removed.

Baby_Got_Feuerbach · Post by **Baby_Got_Feuerbach** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:46 am

PourMeTea wrote:
wtrc wrote:
PourMeTea wrote:
I don't get the joke
I think gnome = Noam
You weren't supposed to answer, it was a trap

Huh what?

orangemochafrapp · Post by **orangemochafrapp** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:47 am

logicspeaks wrote:The wording in the experimental RC was very straightforward IMO and didn't rely on so many inferences.

I think the wording was straightforward, but it just felt wrong. Anyways, hard to explain without going into detail, but I was 99% positive it was the experimental and I guess it was. On my last LSAT, I had an experimental LR and I couldn't decipher as clearly which one it was

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 12:58 am

Post removed.

thevuch · Post by **thevuch** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:04 am

PourMeTea wrote:Also y'all realize there was a straightforward linear/ordering game, yeah?

Straightforward as f**k

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:08 am

Post removed.

thevuch · Post by **thevuch** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:16 am

+1 bamf indeed!

I concur. Awesome test.

PattyCake · Post by **PattyCake** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:29 am

Does anyone know how score reporting works with undisclosed tests? Do we get to see the match up of each section? I know we don't get to see the questions, but do we get a rundown of which questions we got wrong? As in can we see we chose A for question 1 in section 1, and that A was the correct answer? I think that was a separate PDF for the October test, wondering if we'll get that for this one.

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:31 am

Post removed.

PattyCake · Post by **PattyCake** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:34 am

PourMeTea wrote:
PattyCake wrote:Does anyone know how score reporting works with undisclosed tests? Do we get to see the match up of each section? I know we don't get to see the questions, but do we get a rundown of which questions we got wrong? As in can we see we chose A for question 1 in section 1, and that A was the correct answer? I think that was a separate PDF for the October test, wondering if we'll get that for this one.
Nope, we'll never know.

Boo.

PourMeTea · Post by **PourMeTea** » Sun Feb 09, 2014 1:36 am

Post removed.