February 2014 Waiters Forum
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Guys on logic games I had one about ranking offices. It was my section 3. Please say this was the experimental?????
- chem!
- Posts: 9573
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 8:03 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Just wanted to wish you all happy waiting and remind you to choose your words wisely. OP - feel free to put this into the first post as well.
TLS Moderators wrote:This is a warning. This is likely your only warning; you are unlikely to receive any further warnings.
Please be advised that discussion or solicitation (including, but not limited to, PMs and online chatrooms) of any questions or answers from the February 2014 LSAT with anything more than an extremely broad level of specificity will result in a temporary or permanent ban. This may include a permanent ban on your IPs if necessary, which will block you from even viewing the TLS forums. Permanent IP address bans for LSAT discussion have been issued in the past.
Examples have been included for your reference below. This is not an exhaustive list. It is not a defense to say that your overly-specific discussion of an LSAT question did not exactly mirror one of the examples - you will still be banned. Linking to other online materials/discussion of the LSAT questions is also prohibited.
Please note that you agreed not to discuss specific LSAT questions and answers when you completed your signing statement when taking the test. The LSAC considers it a violation to discuss specific questions and answers; the LSAC will act accordingly upon discovering discussion of specific questions and answers. Be advised that the LSAC and its agents monitor this board.
Analytical Reasoning Example wrote:1. Games were hard. Okay.
2. Yeah, on the second question for the second game, I wasn't sure if C was just on Tuesdays or Tuesdays and Wednesdays. Ban.
3. No, the order is ACDBBE. Ban.
4. What about Question Four? If C can't go on Tuesdays, then it has to be Wednesday right? Ban.
5. You guys are stupid. The answer to Question Four and Five is D. Ban.
6. No, the answers are CDAABE. Ban.
7. C'mon guys. How can you not know all of the answers? Ban.Logical Reasoning Example wrote:1. I thought the LR sections weren't too difficult. Okay.
2. What answers did you all get for the coffee growers question? Ban.
3. I got A. Ban.
4. That's weird, I thought it was either B or D. Ban.
5. But it was a parallel reasoning problem. Ban.
6. Damn it, I knew I should have picked B. Ban.
7. Hold on guys, I think the mods might get upset if we keep this up. Never a good sign.
8. Let's trick them by disguising what we're saying. So, hypothetically, if I were a coffee grower..... Ban.
9. You would be displeased with government regulation of pesticides. Ban.
10. But not price controls. Ban.
11. Is that because, hypothetically, price controls would raise prices and revenue? Ban.
12. It's just a cost problem in general. If you were a coffee grower, the legal pesticides would, hypothetically, cost more. Ban.
13. Whoa, it's just like Question 13 from the second LR section in PT 39. Ban.
14. Guys, maybe we should create a chatroom to discuss this. I started one: tinychat.com/letscheatontheLSAT Ban.
15. If you guys could PM me about this, that'd be great. Ban.
Please note that this warning applies to the Reading Comprehension section as well as the writing sample.
If you are in doubt as to whether your drafted post will run afoul of this warning, do not submit the post. You have been warned.
- KingJamesLBJ
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:22 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Rc was easy imo. LG got me
- Mack.Hambleton
- Posts: 5414
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
,
Last edited by Mack.Hambleton on Wed May 07, 2014 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:12 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Had I had maybe 5-10 more minutes I could probably have finished the circle game. Now I just feel like I fucked up on the entire testPattyCake wrote:Yeah circle was easy if the circle itself didn't mess you up. The others are my brain for breakfast.Geometricconfusion wrote:Hey y'all.
I had 2 lg... First one was hard, second one was decent. Second 1 had the circle delegates which I found easy, found the city worker one harder. Reading comp was brutallllllllll
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 3:29 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Guys on logic games I had one about ranking offices. It was my section 3. Please say this was the experimental?????
- BankruptMe
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Did anyone take the writing portion seriously? I swear I saw people who wrote a paragraph and put their head down.
-
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2013 1:17 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Felt the same way. Sh*t happens and I'm never taking this test again so I'm happy.ballsoharduniversity wrote:Had I had maybe 5-10 more minutes I could probably have finished the circle game. Now I just feel like I fucked up on the entire testPattyCake wrote:Yeah circle was easy if the circle itself didn't mess you up. The others are my brain for breakfast.Geometricconfusion wrote:Hey y'all.
I had 2 lg... First one was hard, second one was decent. Second 1 had the circle delegates which I found easy, found the city worker one harder. Reading comp was brutallllllllll
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Sorry all, I was *that guy* who needed extra time to fill in my name, etc. at the beginning of the exam.
- BankruptMe
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Lol I was that guy who ran to the bathroom after coming in late and held up the exam from startingBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Sorry all, I was *that guy* who needed extra time to fill in my name, etc. at the beginning of the exam.
-
- Posts: 323
- Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
It wasn't that circles was particularly hard, but more of "wtf they haven't had that in years, why me..." sort of feeling.PattyCake wrote:Yeah circle was easy if the circle itself didn't mess you up. The others ate my brain for breakfast.Geometricconfusion wrote:Hey y'all.
I had 2 lg... First one was hard, second one was decent. Second 1 had the circle delegates which I found easy, found the city worker one harder. Reading comp was brutallllllllll
- sanibella
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:29 am
Post removed
Post removed
Last edited by sanibella on Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I wrote two or three. I saw some people using all of the front AND all of the back. I used maybe three lines on the back and my handwriting is large.BankruptMe wrote:Did anyone take the writing portion seriously? I swear I saw people who wrote a paragraph and put their head down.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5215
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:16 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I read something that said there is one Yale faculty member who reads the writing sample. I think he's the only one in all of LS admissions though...sanibella wrote:Yes. I know it doesn't count but it is in my blood to take everything seriously. To my own detriment sometimes.BankruptMe wrote:Did anyone take the writing portion seriously? I swear I saw people who wrote a paragraph and put their head down.
Last edited by xylocarp on Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
- BankruptMe
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Lol I made an outline and wrote quite nice.sanibella wrote:Yes. I know it doesn't count but it is in my blood to take everything seriously. To my own detriment sometimes.BankruptMe wrote:Did anyone take the writing portion seriously? I swear I saw people who wrote a paragraph and put their head down.
I hope they actually read it.
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Yeah, I struggled with that kind of game a few weeks ago but watched 7sage and he pointed out that they are EXTREMELY RARE. Never did another one again. Luckily I watched his whole presentation and it stuck with me that they're not much different than basic ordering. Still, yeah, dat WTF feel.kingpin101 wrote:It wasn't that circles was particularly hard, but more of "wtf they haven't had that in years, why me..." sort of feeling.PattyCake wrote:Yeah circle was easy if the circle itself didn't mess you up. The others ate my brain for breakfast.Geometricconfusion wrote:Hey y'all.
I had 2 lg... First one was hard, second one was decent. Second 1 had the circle delegates which I found easy, found the city worker one harder. Reading comp was brutallllllllll
- sanibella
- Posts: 431
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 9:29 am
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Post removed
Last edited by sanibella on Wed Dec 02, 2015 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Did anyone keep track of how many questions there were, in total?
- BankruptMe
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
I saw people doing LG WITHOUT DRAWING A THING.
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Everyone please check the original post and read carefully; mod rules are in place, and are much more general than many people obviously realize; edit your posts accordingly.
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
BankruptMe wrote:I saw people doing LG WITHOUT DRAWING A THING.
They must be amazing!!!!!!
#140ftw
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Some guy kept tapping his foot on the ground and it fucked me up. I told him to stop in the middle of the test.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Just to be absolutely sure, can anyone confirm the section with vampires as the first Q was experimental?
- PattyCake
- Posts: 440
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:02 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Yeah that was experimental.Jyocka wrote:Just to be absolutely sure, can anyone confirm the section with vampires as the first Q was experimental?
- alpwilliams
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:35 pm
Re: February 2014 Waiters
Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Did anyone keep track of how many questions there were, in total?
Last edited by alpwilliams on Sat Feb 08, 2014 4:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login