The Official December 2014 Study Group

GreenTee
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby GreenTee » Tue Nov 11, 2014 4:37 pm

,
Last edited by GreenTee on Mon Jan 26, 2015 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
mornincounselor
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:37 am

Post removed.

Postby mornincounselor » Tue Nov 11, 2014 4:48 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by mornincounselor on Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Tue Nov 11, 2014 4:49 pm

schmelling wrote:
unodostres wrote:PT72

lets go


that test is kinda fun honestly.


I reported this post

GreenTee
Posts: 1364
Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby GreenTee » Tue Nov 11, 2014 4:50 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
schmelling wrote:
unodostres wrote:PT72

lets go


that test is kinda fun honestly.


I reported this post


:lol:

User avatar
unodostres
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby unodostres » Tue Nov 11, 2014 5:48 pm

168
-9 lr split
-6 (3 in tax)
-1

missed a couple early in my last lr section and that tax one wasnt complicated just time issue. ebut what the fuck do i know anymore lsat what the fuck do i know

User avatar
unodostres
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby unodostres » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:09 pm

I think I'll play some battlefield and kill shit

User avatar
mist4bison
Posts: 1549
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:17 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby mist4bison » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:23 pm

.
Last edited by mist4bison on Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
nlee10
Posts: 3016
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:00 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby nlee10 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:40 pm

mist4bison wrote:Thought I'd be able to study, but I ended up reading about M4s & M16s all day. Plan is to go home and drill.

I think my focus the next week will be:
RC (in general)
MSS
Weaken
Nec Assumption

Those have been my most costliest types.


We are lsat twins....those are my worst LR types too.

User avatar
dasani13
Posts: 1055
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 3:21 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby dasani13 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:44 pm

nlee10 wrote:
mist4bison wrote:Thought I'd be able to study, but I ended up reading about M4s & M16s all day. Plan is to go home and drill.

I think my focus the next week will be:
RC (in general)
MSS
Weaken
Nec Assumption

Those have been my most costliest types.


We are lsat twins....those are my worst LR types too.


have you guys read the Trainer's explanation for NA?

User avatar
nlee10
Posts: 3016
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:00 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby nlee10 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:50 pm

dasani13 wrote:
have you guys read the Trainer's explanation for NA?


I believe I read back when I first started studying for the test....so it'd probably be good for me to reread them now. lol.
I already went through the basic flaw chapters again and it makes so much more sense now than in July. lmao.

User avatar
dasani13
Posts: 1055
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 3:21 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby dasani13 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 6:56 pm

nlee10 wrote:
dasani13 wrote:
have you guys read the Trainer's explanation for NA?


I believe I read back when I first started studying for the test....so it'd probably be good for me to reread them now. lol.
I already went through the basic flaw chapters again and it makes so much more sense now than in July. lmao.



lol yeah, I had forgotten how much drilling LR and re-reading the Trainer helps. I think that was my biggest mistake during Sept. prep.

secadc11
Posts: 601
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 12:13 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby secadc11 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:04 pm

dasani13 wrote:
nlee10 wrote:
dasani13 wrote:
have you guys read the Trainer's explanation for NA?


I believe I read back when I first started studying for the test....so it'd probably be good for me to reread them now. lol.
I already went through the basic flaw chapters again and it makes so much more sense now than in July. lmao.



lol yeah, I had forgotten how much drilling LR and re-reading the Trainer helps. I think that was my biggest mistake during Sept. prep.


Pathetically excited to read those chapters... I am also worst at NA and am planning on reading the corresponding info in the Trainer and drilling NA tonight. I never used the Trainer before this round of prep and am pretty impressed with it thus far.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:15 pm

unodostres wrote:I think I'll play some battlefield and kill shit

Word

User avatar
Smallville
Posts: 4748
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Smallville » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:22 pm

nlee10 wrote:
mist4bison wrote:Thought I'd be able to study, but I ended up reading about M4s & M16s all day. Plan is to go home and drill.

I think my focus the next week will be:
RC (in general)
MSS
Weaken
Nec Assumption

Those have been my most costliest types.


We are lsat twins....those are my worst LR types too.

I think its about that time to start on the RC grind... which I realllllyyyy don't wanna do lol
+Flaw LR... for some reason they give me issues

User avatar
nlee10
Posts: 3016
Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:00 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby nlee10 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:36 pm

Jgoods wrote:I think its about that time to start on the RC grind... which I realllllyyyy don't wanna do lol
+Flaw LR... for some reason they give me issues


haha, I feel like LR Flaw Q's are either really easy to spot or really hard to spot/AC reworded very confusingly.

ETA: Just did 60 Assumptions (40 Necessary 20 Sufficient). My brain hurts.

User avatar
mist4bison
Posts: 1549
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:17 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby mist4bison » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:43 pm

.
Last edited by mist4bison on Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

pta
Posts: 1851
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:37 pm

Post removed...

Postby pta » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:05 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by pta on Wed Dec 30, 2015 6:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
unodostres
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby unodostres » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:08 pm

Why two practice exams in one day. Id rather commit seppuku. And why base it off one exam. You should address why you got that 158 . Then address the types of questions. Then drill.

Speaking of drilling ... I've been missing parallel q like crazy na imma do some more

User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 11953
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Rigo » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:15 pm

:mrgreen:
Last edited by Rigo on Thu Dec 18, 2014 12:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

pta
Posts: 1851
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:37 pm

Post removed...

Postby pta » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:17 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by pta on Wed Dec 30, 2015 6:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2721
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:23 pm

Peta wrote:
unodostres wrote:Why two practice exams in one day. Id rather commit seppuku. And why base it off one exam. You should address why you got that 158 . Then address the types of questions. Then drill.

Speaking of drilling ... I've been missing parallel q like crazy na imma do some more
I normally don't have that much time to study and wanted to make the most of my holiday.

I was demoralized because I also did terribly on another practice test I did yesterday.


Maybe you did better on the second exam because you were performing under pressure? Like unodostres said, go over the first (and second test) and address what caused the score.

Which PTs were they, anyway?

pta
Posts: 1851
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 4:37 pm

Post removed...

Postby pta » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:32 pm

Post removed...
Last edited by pta on Wed Dec 30, 2015 6:07 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Superstaranonymous
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 2:29 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Superstaranonymous » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:38 pm

.
Last edited by Superstaranonymous on Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:03 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2721
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:38 pm

Peta wrote:The preptest I bombed was 46 from June 2005. The one I got a 165 on was preptest 55 from October 2008. I remember the LR from 46 being unusually more difficult than I'm use to, for some reason.


I'd focus on the more recent PTs (60+) in order to accurately gauge your average. The test definitely evolves over time!

User avatar
mist4bison
Posts: 1549
Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:17 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby mist4bison » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:42 pm

.
Last edited by mist4bison on Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: dj9i27, Yahoo [Bot] and 6 guests