The Official December 2014 Study Group

User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 11947
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Rigo » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:33 pm

:mrgreen:
Last edited by Rigo on Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:34 pm

Jgoods wrote:fool


got some sass

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2701
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:34 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Jgoods wrote:fool


got some sass


ETA: Reading all my posts as JY and losing it.

User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 11947
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Rigo » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:35 pm

:mrgreen:
Last edited by Rigo on Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
thelincolnlawyer
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:33 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby thelincolnlawyer » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:38 pm

mornincounselor wrote:I think I may have just found something interesting with PT 10 Game 1 (in the pure sequencing games packet)

Question 4 asks us that "the compositon of each class CAN be completely determined if which one of the following pairs of students is known to be in the level 2 class?"

I believe this gives us the option of putting this pair into any of the three spaces in group 2, right? If so then by putting F-K into spots 5 and 6 at the back end of group 2 we force all the remaining elements into place. That's what I just did for this question and it's wrong, but with this phrasing I think it's a good anwser.

IGJ | MFK | LHN

L H N are not necc. in that order but the compositon of all the groups is still forced into place. I guess the issue is F and K can be in group 2 without being in slots 5 and 6. If for example F and K are in slots 4 and 5 then the other elements are not forced. But it CAN be fully determined.


You could also have:

IGJ | FKL | MHN

It's not completely determined because M and L can be in 2 or 3. They are asking for the combination that would completely set the classes in stone.

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2701
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:39 pm

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 11947
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Rigo » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:40 pm

:mrgreen:
Last edited by Rigo on Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Smallville
Posts: 4741
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Smallville » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:40 pm

Shakawkaw wrote:Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

User avatar
mornincounselor
Posts: 1220
Joined: Sun Apr 21, 2013 1:37 am

Post removed.

Postby mornincounselor » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:41 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by mornincounselor on Mon Nov 09, 2015 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:41 pm

Shakawkaw wrote:Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.


the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2701
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:42 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.


the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler


99th percentile only plz. ty ty.

User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 11947
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Rigo » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:43 pm

:mrgreen:
Last edited by Rigo on Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2701
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:43 pm

Jgoods wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.


Not sure if this is funny and I'm just tired, or if this isn't funny at all.

User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 11947
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Rigo » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:43 pm

:mrgreen:
Last edited by Rigo on Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2701
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:44 pm

Dirigo wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?
Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler

Dunce. But not really. I have a gut feeling I'm going to 166.


Rigo, are you self-studying or did you take a Kaplan course?

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2701
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:44 pm

Dirigo wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.


the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler


99th percentile only plz. ty ty.

What did you actually score?


I got a 161.

User avatar
Smallville
Posts: 4741
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Smallville » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:46 pm

Shakawkaw wrote:
Jgoods wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.


Not sure if this is funny and I'm just tired, or if this isn't funny at all.

probably this

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:47 pm

anyone else still need to enroll

this process is too expensive

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:47 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.


the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler

yes flaws are good and RC didnt use it for lg bc Mike uses alot of subscripts which i find confusing

User avatar
thelincolnlawyer
Posts: 347
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:33 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby thelincolnlawyer » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:48 pm

mornincounselor wrote:
thelincolnlawyer wrote:
mornincounselor wrote:I think I may have just found something interesting with PT 10 Game 1 (in the pure sequencing games packet)

Question 4 asks us that "the compositon of each class CAN be completely determined if which one of the following pairs of students is known to be in the level 2 class?"

I believe this gives us the option of putting this pair into any of the three spaces in group 2, right? If so then by putting F-K into spots 5 and 6 at the back end of group 2 we force all the remaining elements into place. That's what I just did for this question and it's wrong, but with this phrasing I think it's a good anwser.

IGJ | MFK | LHN

L H N are not necc. in that order but the compositon of all the groups is still forced into place. I guess the issue is F and K can be in group 2 without being in slots 5 and 6. If for example F and K are in slots 4 and 5 then the other elements are not forced. But it CAN be fully determined.


You could also have:

IGJ | FKL | MHN

It's not completely determined because M and L can be in 2 or 3. They are asking for the combination that would completely set the classes in stone.


But they are asking for a CAN be fully determined not a MUST be fully determined. When we put F and K into slots 5 and 6 (instead of 4 and 5) then L is forced into group 3 therbye forcing M into group 2.


I definitely see what you're saying but it's not fully determined if there is more than one assortment of classes possible

User avatar
IsThisForReal
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:29 am

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby IsThisForReal » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:53 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:anyone else still need to enroll

this process is too expensive

Wait, you aren't rich? I thought you were rich.

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2701
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:53 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:anyone else still need to enroll

this process is too expensive


PM me for sugar daddy deets. Oh wait...

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:54 pm

IsThisForReal wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:anyone else still need to enroll

this process is too expensive

Wait, you aren't rich? I thought you were rich.


just bc its too expensive doesnt mean im not rich

User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 11947
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Rigo » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:55 pm

:mrgreen:
Last edited by Rigo on Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Shakawkaw
Posts: 2701
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group

Postby Shakawkaw » Tue Oct 28, 2014 3:56 pm

Dirigo wrote:
Shakawkaw wrote:I got a 161.

I respect the fact you're retaking.


I hate you.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, bearedman8, bigv, dontsaywhatyoumean, Greenteachurro, Lawl_Schoolz and 9 guests