The Official December 2014 Study Group

[Rigo]

[Colonel_funkadunk]

fool

got some sass

[Shakawkaw]

fool

got some sass

ETA: Reading all my posts as JY and losing it.

[Rigo]

[thelincolnlawyer]

I think I may have just found something interesting with PT 10 Game 1 (in the pure sequencing games packet)

Question 4 asks us that "the compositon of each class CAN be completely determined if which one of the following pairs of students is known to be in the level 2 class?"

I believe this gives us the option of putting this pair into any of the three spaces in group 2, right? If so then by putting F-K into spots 5 and 6 at the back end of group 2 we force all the remaining elements into place. That's what I just did for this question and it's wrong, but with this phrasing I think it's a good anwser.

IGJ | MFK | LHN

L H N are not necc. in that order but the compositon of all the groups is still forced into place. I guess the issue is F and K can be in group 2 without being in slots 5 and 6. If for example F and K are in slots 4 and 5 then the other elements are not forced. But it CAN be fully determined.

You could also have:

IGJ | FKL | MHN

It's not completely determined because M and L can be in 2 or 3. They are asking for the combination that would completely set the classes in stone.

[Shakawkaw]

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

[Rigo]

[Smallville]

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

[mornincounselor]

Post removed.

[Colonel_funkadunk]

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler

[Shakawkaw]

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler

99th percentile only plz. ty ty.

[Rigo]

[Shakawkaw]

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

Not sure if this is funny and I'm just tired, or if this isn't funny at all.

[Rigo]

[Shakawkaw]

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?
Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler

Dunce. But not really. I have a gut feeling I'm going to 166.

Rigo, are you self-studying or did you take a Kaplan course?

[Shakawkaw]

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler

99th percentile only plz. ty ty.

What did you actually score?

I got a 161.

[Smallville]

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

Not sure if this is funny and I'm just tired, or if this isn't funny at all.

probably this

[Colonel_funkadunk]

anyone else still need to enroll

this process is too expensive

[BillPackets]

Guys - what chapters in the Trainer do you think are the most worthwhile to go over again?

Plz don't say the ones I have weaknesses in.

the trainer is really helpful with flaws. I didnt use it for games either. RC was helpful. im also only a 93rd percentiler

yes flaws are good and RC didnt use it for lg bc Mike uses alot of subscripts which i find confusing

[thelincolnlawyer]

I think I may have just found something interesting with PT 10 Game 1 (in the pure sequencing games packet)

Question 4 asks us that "the compositon of each class CAN be completely determined if which one of the following pairs of students is known to be in the level 2 class?"

I believe this gives us the option of putting this pair into any of the three spaces in group 2, right? If so then by putting F-K into spots 5 and 6 at the back end of group 2 we force all the remaining elements into place. That's what I just did for this question and it's wrong, but with this phrasing I think it's a good anwser.

IGJ | MFK | LHN

L H N are not necc. in that order but the compositon of all the groups is still forced into place. I guess the issue is F and K can be in group 2 without being in slots 5 and 6. If for example F and K are in slots 4 and 5 then the other elements are not forced. But it CAN be fully determined.

You could also have:

IGJ | FKL | MHN

It's not completely determined because M and L can be in 2 or 3. They are asking for the combination that would completely set the classes in stone.

But they are asking for a CAN be fully determined not a MUST be fully determined. When we put F and K into slots 5 and 6 (instead of 4 and 5) then L is forced into group 3 therbye forcing M into group 2.

I definitely see what you're saying but it's not fully determined if there is more than one assortment of classes possible

[IsThisForReal]

anyone else still need to enroll

this process is too expensive

Wait, you aren't rich? I thought you were rich.

[Shakawkaw]

anyone else still need to enroll

this process is too expensive

PM me for sugar daddy deets. Oh wait...

[Colonel_funkadunk]

anyone else still need to enroll

this process is too expensive

Wait, you aren't rich? I thought you were rich.

just bc its too expensive doesnt mean im not rich

[Rigo]

[Shakawkaw]

I got a 161.

I respect the fact you're retaking.

I hate you.