The Official December 2014 Study Group Forum
- IsThisForReal
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:29 am
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Last edited by IsThisForReal on Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Yeah, people use it. I think it's a waste of money. Some people set their watches to 12:00 at the start of a section. I just read my watch.
- LSATneurotic
- Posts: 982
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
171 on PT 65. Missed too many on LR'( -9). If i could get my LR average down to -4 total i think i could grab a 174 on test day. Anybody have any advice for LR materials ? The really tough LR questions are my downfall
- Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Do you find that you are getting a specific question type wrong? Drill those. Cambridge packets are arranged by difficulty.LSATneurotic wrote:171 on PT 65. Missed too many on LR'( -9). If i could get my LR average down to -4 total i think i could grab a 174 on test day. Anybody have any advice for LR materials ? The really tough LR questions are my downfall
- nlee10
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:00 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
The feeling of not wanting to do anything the rest of today after a PT.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- IsThisForReal
- Posts: 3833
- Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 8:29 am
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Same here. I just read my watch for most sections and then I use the built in stopwatch for LG. But, I thought that was pretty interesting.Shakawkaw wrote:Yeah, people use it. I think it's a waste of money. Some people set their watches to 12:00 at the start of a section. I just read my watch.
Last edited by IsThisForReal on Sun Jan 28, 2018 12:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jw316
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:29 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Just finished BR of PT 51, about to do 1/2 chapters in the trainer and jump back on TLS after and then call it a night.
LR1: 15/25 (-10) BR: 19/25 (-6)
(* Only reached question 20/25 before time was up)
RC: 18/28 (-10) BR: 24/28 (-4)
(* Only got up to question 20/28 before time was up—3/4 passages)
LR2: 15/25 (-10) 19/25 (-6)
(* Only reached question 21/25 before time was up)
LG: 18/22 (-4) BR: *21/22 (-1)
(* Only reached question 20/22 before time was up; went too fast on the first game at the end because I mis-read and picked the wrong answer even though the diagram next to it indicates the right answer, then didn't have enough time to complete the last game's 7 questions)
66/100 83/100
Score: 155 Score: 166
"Timing continues to be the enemy." I also noticed both LR sections were heavy on MSS and such types that I still haven't gotten to in the trainer.
PS has anyone noticed any commonalities in the LR sections themselves? Like I know it's only 25 questions but the same way a games section might be heavy on ordering games or grouping games etc. I've noticed that sometimes it seems like they tend to favor an LR question type to kind of test repeatedly throughout that section. But I could just be making that up..
That being said, any advice given the above and the difference in my scores?
Again I'm continuing my plan to finish the LSAT trainer ASAP (no later than the middle of next week 18th/19th), drill timed sections, and take PTs/BR like this as much as possible without just chugging through them to take them. I realize as a diagnostic tool it really is useful to get everything you can out of a PT—and right now for me that's a lot—vs just like taking one today, grading it, and taking another one in the morning. Although I feel like for the latter—day after day, multiple in the same day, etc.—that's fine when you're not missing too many questions on a PT because there isn't much to review after.
LR1: 15/25 (-10) BR: 19/25 (-6)
(* Only reached question 20/25 before time was up)
RC: 18/28 (-10) BR: 24/28 (-4)
(* Only got up to question 20/28 before time was up—3/4 passages)
LR2: 15/25 (-10) 19/25 (-6)
(* Only reached question 21/25 before time was up)
LG: 18/22 (-4) BR: *21/22 (-1)
(* Only reached question 20/22 before time was up; went too fast on the first game at the end because I mis-read and picked the wrong answer even though the diagram next to it indicates the right answer, then didn't have enough time to complete the last game's 7 questions)
66/100 83/100
Score: 155 Score: 166
"Timing continues to be the enemy." I also noticed both LR sections were heavy on MSS and such types that I still haven't gotten to in the trainer.
PS has anyone noticed any commonalities in the LR sections themselves? Like I know it's only 25 questions but the same way a games section might be heavy on ordering games or grouping games etc. I've noticed that sometimes it seems like they tend to favor an LR question type to kind of test repeatedly throughout that section. But I could just be making that up..
That being said, any advice given the above and the difference in my scores?
Again I'm continuing my plan to finish the LSAT trainer ASAP (no later than the middle of next week 18th/19th), drill timed sections, and take PTs/BR like this as much as possible without just chugging through them to take them. I realize as a diagnostic tool it really is useful to get everything you can out of a PT—and right now for me that's a lot—vs just like taking one today, grading it, and taking another one in the morning. Although I feel like for the latter—day after day, multiple in the same day, etc.—that's fine when you're not missing too many questions on a PT because there isn't much to review after.
- nlee10
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:00 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
jw316 wrote:Just finished BR of PT 51, about to do 1/2 chapters in the trainer and jump back on TLS after and then call it a night.
LR1: 15/25 (-10) BR: 19/25 (-6)
(* Only reached question 20/25 before time was up)
RC: 18/28 (-10) BR: 24/28 (-4)
(* Only got up to question 20/28 before time was up—3/4 passages)
LR2: 15/25 (-10) 19/25 (-6)
(* Only reached question 21/25 before time was up)
LG: 18/22 (-4) BR: *21/22 (-1)
(* Only reached question 20/22 before time was up; went too fast on the first game at the end because I mis-read and picked the wrong answer even though the diagram next to it indicates the right answer, then didn't have enough time to complete the last game's 7 questions)
66/100 83/100
Score: 155 Score: 166
"Timing continues to be the enemy." I also noticed both LR sections were heavy on MSS and such types that I still haven't gotten to in the trainer.
PS has anyone noticed any commonalities in the LR sections themselves? Like I know it's only 25 questions but the same way a games section might be heavy on ordering games or grouping games etc. I've noticed that sometimes it seems like they tend to favor an LR question type to kind of test repeatedly throughout that section. But I could just be making that up..
That being said, any advice given the above and the difference in my scores?
Again I'm continuing my plan to finish the LSAT trainer ASAP (no later than the middle of next week 18th/19th), drill timed sections, and take PTs/BR like this as much as possible without just chugging through them to take them. I realize as a diagnostic tool it really is useful to get everything you can out of a PT—and right now for me that's a lot—vs just like taking one today, grading it, and taking another one in the morning. Although I feel like for the latter—day after day, multiple in the same day, etc.—that's fine when you're not missing too many questions on a PT because there isn't much to review after.
I just noticed this today on PT 66 compared to PT 71.
On PT 66, there were only 4 MBT/MSS questions whereas in PT 71, there were 11 MBT/MSS...and personally for me MBT/MSS tend to be time suckers.
ETA: I would just say continue drilling your weak points. For me, it's MBT/MSS and assumptions so I will continue focusing on them.
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
clearly timing is an issue. a 10 point jump between timed an untimed is pretty substantial. I will say also- getting less than 20 right in each section untimed on BR is an issue also.jw316 wrote:
That being said, any advice given the above and the difference in my scores?
idk your goal, diag or anything, but thats just way too many LR to be missing in an untimed environment. Stick with the trainer to find out what your accuracy issues are but also def be doing a lot of timing drills to make sure you have that down by test day.
and now i need an advil after making an on topic post.
eta: i get what youre saying about sections being heavy on question types and yea thats possible, but regardless of question type they stack the difficulty of questions and curve accordingly.
- Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Where is the real Colonel? Hiding with GT??Colonel_funkadunk wrote:and now i need an advil after making an on topic post.
ETA: I see married life is making a decent man out of you.
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
assumptionShakawkaw wrote: man
women can be colonels too
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
sup ITFR you retaking?
- Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Gender is a social construct, etc etc.Colonel_funkadunk wrote:assumptionShakawkaw wrote: man
women can be colonels too
So, I did no work today. Plz shame me, nlee.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- nlee10
- Posts: 3015
- Joined: Tue Jul 08, 2014 5:00 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
shameShakawkaw wrote:Gender is a social construct, etc etc.Colonel_funkadunk wrote:assumptionShakawkaw wrote: man
women can be colonels too
So, I did no work today. Plz shame me, nlee.
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
tar thiefShakawkaw wrote:Gender is a social construct, etc etc.Colonel_funkadunk wrote:assumptionShakawkaw wrote: man
women can be colonels too
So, I did no work today. Plz shame me, nlee.
- Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Kinda anti-climactic. I guess I'll take it.nlee10 wrote:
shame
-
- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Last edited by Rigo on Wed Dec 17, 2014 8:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
I will have whatever it is that you are smoking and/or imbibing.Colonel_funkadunk wrote: tar thief
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
It'll grow on you like I didDirigo wrote:Not a fan of the new tars.
NEXT.
- Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Wtf kinda kinky shit are you into, Colonel?Colonel_funkadunk wrote:It'll grow on you like I didDirigo wrote:Not a fan of the new tars.
NEXT.
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
This is an A B convoShakawkaw wrote:Wtf kinda kinky shit are you into, Colonel?Colonel_funkadunk wrote:It'll grow on you like I didDirigo wrote:Not a fan of the new tars.
NEXT.
C ur way out
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- mist4bison
- Posts: 1552
- Joined: Sat Jan 11, 2014 12:17 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
.
Last edited by mist4bison on Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- dmarieb
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 9:28 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
There's also this one.IsThisForReal wrote:Same here. I just read my watch for most sections and then I use the built in stopwatch for LG. But, I thought that was pretty interesting.Shakawkaw wrote:Yeah, people use it. I think it's a waste of money. Some people set their watches to 12:00 at the start of a section. I just read my watch.
http://lsatmax.com/watch/
It's 50% off and free shipping right now if you use the code LSATMax
I saw it on IG the other day, but I don't know anything about it.
- Shakawkaw
- Posts: 4807
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 7:15 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
Colonel_funkadunk wrote: C ur way out
- justabitunusual
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 4:28 pm
Re: The Official December 2014 Study Group
You don't like mine?? Please.Dirigo wrote:Not a fan of the new tars.
NEXT.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login