The Official September 2014 Study Group

User avatar
hetookmetoamovie
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby hetookmetoamovie » Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:55 am

btw Hand, have you taken the ageless Paul Rudd quiz? It's harder than you'd think!
http://www.vulture.com/2013/03/take-our ... -quiz.html

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:55 am

hereisonehand wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:I really enjoy the way Bill clothes his thoughtful commentary and occasionally elevated diction in textspeak. I see it as a kind of High Street/couture approach to language; there's a genius in the mixing. And some fairly august linguists even liken switching back and forth between textspeak and orthodox language to bilingualism. So in a way, by forcing us to toggle back and forth as readers, Bill is treating us to a more complicated experience with language.
However despite this apparent respect for language in the highest regard, Bill and others like him have encountered a high level of criticism. Those who see this language usage as an abomination can generally be seen as falling into two types. The first type is those who have a genetic predisposition forcing them to only be able to read sentences with proper punctuation. This is a very rare deformity and basically an anomaly. Therefore the focus should rely mainly on the second type: those with such a level of pretension that every utterance that comes out of their mouth must be bombastic in nature.
A recent study by Jerry B. Knowitall has provided those who consider this criticism to be unfair with additional ground for countering the skepticism regarding the value of the unique combination of thoughtful content and a form free from the constraints of grammar and spelling exhibited in the works of BillPackets and others. In the development of the Ur-Germanic language from which English and other continental languages evolved, a similar pattern of language use occurred, and Mr. Knowitall contends that the introduction of this pattern has helped spur the development of the English language as we know it today. Instead of seeing it as regressive (or worse, degenerate), we ought to embrace the wit and elegance that is packed in textspeak as a crucial step towards the future development of English.


Of course, despite the historical impetus behind the development of the English language that is well documented by Dr. Knowitall and others like him, we should not expect the current forces that are pushing the English language into a new epoch to be readily accepted among all members of society. Indeed, throughout history, the evolution and changing nature of English has been fought and derided by those in positions of authority, and in particular by those who possess a false sense of what the English language actually is e.g. an "unchanging, holistic pattern of communicative sounds". So, while it may seem that textspeak is the next logical direction for the English language, given the influence of technology on society, we should not be surprised that some will hold onto a 'traditional' sense of the English language and attempt to fight the inherent changing nature of the English language.

User avatar
unodostres
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby unodostres » Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:55 am

u guys shud be test writers

User avatar
Smallville
Posts: 4741
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Smallville » Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:58 am

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:I really enjoy the way Bill clothes his thoughtful commentary and occasionally elevated diction in textspeak. I see it as a kind of High Street/couture approach to language; there's a genius in the mixing. And some fairly august linguists even liken switching back and forth between textspeak and orthodox language to bilingualism. So in a way, by forcing us to toggle back and forth as readers, Bill is treating us to a more complicated experience with language.
However despite this apparent respect for language in the highest regard, Bill and others like him have encountered a high level of criticism. Those who see this language usage as an abomination can generally be seen as falling into two types. The first type is those who have a genetic predisposition forcing them to only be able to read sentences with proper punctuation. This is a very rare deformity and basically an anomaly. Therefore the focus should rely mainly on the second type: those with such a level of pretension that every utterance that comes out of their mouth must be bombastic in nature.
A recent study by Jerry B. Knowitall has provided those who consider this criticism to be unfair with additional ground for countering the skepticism regarding the value of the unique combination of thoughtful content and a form free from the constraints of grammar and spelling exhibited in the works of BillPackets and others. In the development of the Ur-Germanic language from which English and other continental languages evolved, a similar pattern of language use occurred, and Mr. Knowitall contends that the introduction of this pattern has helped spur the development of the English language as we know it today. Instead of seeing it as regressive (or worse, degenerate), we ought to embrace the wit and elegance that is packed in textspeak as a crucial step towards the future development of English.



15. The passage utilizes a study by mr knowitall for which of the following reasons?
A) to provide support for the idea that billpackets textspeak is not useful to the overall meaning he is trying to communicate
B) To compare one idea to an analogous idea for which both have suffered attempts to discredit
C) to argue that one particular language usage at present is in part has been seen to be common formerly
D) to highlight the badassery of havin a last name "knowitall"
E) to silence the haters

I want to read this so bad lol but would take too much from work... can it be break time yet?

User avatar
Gray
Posts: 5988
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Gray » Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:58 am

unodostres wrote:u guys shud be test writers

Or like lawyers maybe.

User avatar
Hand
Posts: 3519
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Hand » Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:58 am

hetookmetoamovie wrote:btw Hand, have you taken the ageless Paul Rudd quiz? It's harder than you'd think!
http://www.vulture.com/2013/03/take-our ... -quiz.html


I hadn't, I scored 10/16; how did you do?

I did really well on the "philosophy professor or hobo" test

http://individual.utoronto.ca/somody/quiz.html

User avatar
Hand
Posts: 3519
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Hand » Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:59 am

Bill you really got me with "given the influence of technology on society"

User avatar
Gray
Posts: 5988
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Gray » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:00 pm

hereisonehand wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:btw Hand, have you taken the ageless Paul Rudd quiz? It's harder than you'd think!
http://www.vulture.com/2013/03/take-our ... -quiz.html


I hadn't, I scored 10/16; how did you do?

I did really well on the "philosophy professor or hobo" test

http://individual.utoronto.ca/somody/quiz.html

I aced that one.
Was really proud b/c some were harder than RC

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:01 pm

hereisonehand wrote:Bill you really got me with "given the influence of technology on society"

its important to note that very broad thing that is happening

User avatar
ErgoSum
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ErgoSum » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:03 pm

BillPackets wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:I really enjoy the way Bill clothes his thoughtful commentary and occasionally elevated diction in textspeak. I see it as a kind of High Street/couture approach to language; there's a genius in the mixing. And some fairly august linguists even liken switching back and forth between textspeak and orthodox language to bilingualism. So in a way, by forcing us to toggle back and forth as readers, Bill is treating us to a more complicated experience with language.
However despite this apparent respect for language in the highest regard, Bill and others like him have encountered a high level of criticism. Those who see this language usage as an abomination can generally be seen as falling into two types. The first type is those who have a genetic predisposition forcing them to only be able to read sentences with proper punctuation. This is a very rare deformity and basically an anomaly. Therefore the focus should rely mainly on the second type: those with such a level of pretension that every utterance that comes out of their mouth must be bombastic in nature.
A recent study by Jerry B. Knowitall has provided those who consider this criticism to be unfair with additional ground for countering the skepticism regarding the value of the unique combination of thoughtful content and a form free from the constraints of grammar and spelling exhibited in the works of BillPackets and others. In the development of the Ur-Germanic language from which English and other continental languages evolved, a similar pattern of language use occurred, and Mr. Knowitall contends that the introduction of this pattern has helped spur the development of the English language as we know it today. Instead of seeing it as regressive (or worse, degenerate), we ought to embrace the wit and elegance that is packed in textspeak as a crucial step towards the future development of English.


Of course, despite the historical impetus behind the development of the English language that is well documented by Dr. Knowitall and others like him, we should not expect the current forces that are pushing the English language into a new epoch to be readily accepted among all members of society. Indeed, throughout history, the evolution and changing nature of English has been fought and derided by those in positions of authority, and in particular by those who possess a false sense of what the English language actually is e.g. an "unchanging, holistic pattern of communicative sounds". So, while it may seem that textspeak is the next logical direction for the English language, given the influence of technology on society, we should not be surprised that some will hold onto a 'traditional' sense of the English language and attempt to fight the inherent changing nature of the English language.


Image

User avatar
Gray
Posts: 5988
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Gray » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:06 pm

So glad someone brought up Lost.
Hi Sawyer.... 8)

User avatar
Smallville
Posts: 4741
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Smallville » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:06 pm

hereisonehand wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:btw Hand, have you taken the ageless Paul Rudd quiz? It's harder than you'd think!
http://www.vulture.com/2013/03/take-our ... -quiz.html


I hadn't, I scored 10/16; how did you do?

I did really well on the "philosophy professor or hobo" test

http://individual.utoronto.ca/somody/quiz.html


14/16 get at me lol

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:07 pm

hetookmetoamovie wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:I really enjoy the way Bill clothes his thoughtful commentary and occasionally elevated diction in textspeak. I see it as a kind of High Street/couture approach to language; there's a genius in the mixing. And some fairly august linguists even liken switching back and forth between textspeak and orthodox language to bilingualism. So in a way, by forcing us to toggle back and forth as readers, Bill is treating us to a more complicated experience with language.
However despite this apparent respect for language in the highest regard, Bill and others like him have encountered a high level of criticism. Those who see this language usage as an abomination can generally be seen as falling into two types. The first type is those who have a genetic predisposition forcing them to only be able to read sentences with proper punctuation. This is a very rare deformity and basically an anomaly. Therefore the focus should rely mainly on the second type: those with such a level of pretension that every utterance that comes out of their mouth must be bombastic in nature.
A recent study by Jerry B. Knowitall has provided those who consider this criticism to be unfair with additional ground for countering the skepticism regarding the value of the unique combination of thoughtful content and a form free from the constraints of grammar and spelling exhibited in the works of BillPackets and others. In the development of the Ur-Germanic language from which English and other continental languages evolved, a similar pattern of language use occurred, and Mr. Knowitall contends that the introduction of this pattern has helped spur the development of the English language as we know it today. Instead of seeing it as regressive (or worse, degenerate), we ought to embrace the wit and elegance that is packed in textspeak as a crucial step towards the future development of English.





16. It can be inferred from the passage that:
A) Most individuals who disapprove of Bill's heterodox approach to language do so as the result of a genetic abnormality
B) Schools should focus on teaching textspeak alongside English
C) BillPackets would have faced similar disdain at the time of the Ur-Germanic language
D) Bill sometimes does not use proper punctuation
E) Those "bombastic in nature" never make errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation


17. The situation described in the passage mirrors which of the following situations?
A) a prominent politician who accepted bribes is prosecuted and sent to prison.
B) an author who has written many novels receives a scathing critique regarding a metaphor that is believed to be stolen
C) a family purchases an extra box of cereal at the grocery store after realizing their order the week before was too small
D) a football coach is critiqued for his unorthodox play calling but upon further review it appears his play calling was the first type to be found in recorded football history
E) a hospital worker is fired for going willy nilly with the needles

User avatar
Hand
Posts: 3519
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Hand » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:08 pm

c'mon guys someone write me a "the author would most likely agree with which one of the following statements" Q

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:08 pm

BillPackets wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:I really enjoy the way Bill clothes his thoughtful commentary and occasionally elevated diction in textspeak. I see it as a kind of High Street/couture approach to language; there's a genius in the mixing. And some fairly august linguists even liken switching back and forth between textspeak and orthodox language to bilingualism. So in a way, by forcing us to toggle back and forth as readers, Bill is treating us to a more complicated experience with language.
However despite this apparent respect for language in the highest regard, Bill and others like him have encountered a high level of criticism. Those who see this language usage as an abomination can generally be seen as falling into two types. The first type is those who have a genetic predisposition forcing them to only be able to read sentences with proper punctuation. This is a very rare deformity and basically an anomaly. Therefore the focus should rely mainly on the second type: those with such a level of pretension that every utterance that comes out of their mouth must be bombastic in nature.
A recent study by Jerry B. Knowitall has provided those who consider this criticism to be unfair with additional ground for countering the skepticism regarding the value of the unique combination of thoughtful content and a form free from the constraints of grammar and spelling exhibited in the works of BillPackets and others. In the development of the Ur-Germanic language from which English and other continental languages evolved, a similar pattern of language use occurred, and Mr. Knowitall contends that the introduction of this pattern has helped spur the development of the English language as we know it today. Instead of seeing it as regressive (or worse, degenerate), we ought to embrace the wit and elegance that is packed in textspeak as a crucial step towards the future development of English.


Of course, despite the historical impetus behind the development of the English language that is well documented by Dr. Knowitall and others like him, we should not expect the current forces that are pushing the English language into a new epoch to be readily accepted among all members of society. Indeed, throughout history, the evolution and changing nature of English has been fought and derided by those in positions of authority, and in particular by those who possess a false sense of what the English language actually is e.g. an "unchanging, holistic pattern of communicative sounds". So, while it may seem that textspeak is the next logical direction for the English language, given the influence of technology on society, we should not be surprised that some will hold onto a 'traditional' sense of the English language and attempt to fight the inherent changing nature of the English language.


Just saw bills addition

We are 180 guys

User avatar
Hand
Posts: 3519
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Hand » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:09 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:going willy nilly with the needles

User avatar
Smallville
Posts: 4741
Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2014 11:57 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Smallville » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:12 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:

Just saw bills addition

We are 180 guys[/quote][/quote]
180

User avatar
sfoglia
Posts: 1758
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby sfoglia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:14 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Just saw bills addition

We are 180 guys


YO COLONEL, I'MMA LET YOU FINISH, BUT THIS THREAD HAD ONE OF THE BEST RC OF ALL TIME. ONE OF THE BEST. RC. OF ALL TIME.

I am pretty sure we are the most clever fucking people on this planet. We are 1800.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:14 pm

hereisonehand wrote:c'mon guys someone write me a "the author would most likely agree with which one of the following statements" Q



18. The author would agree with which one of the following statements?
A) critiques that have some objective basis are always true
B) some criticism of style based objection are unwarranted
C) If what is true is not true, then that which is said to be true is doubtful
D) criticisms that seem plausible on face value, may be due to a misunderstanding of cultural history
E) the modern repertoire of common English is set in what should be included

User avatar
hetookmetoamovie
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby hetookmetoamovie » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:15 pm

Jgoods wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:btw Hand, have you taken the ageless Paul Rudd quiz? It's harder than you'd think!
http://www.vulture.com/2013/03/take-our ... -quiz.html


I hadn't, I scored 10/16; how did you do?

I did really well on the "philosophy professor or hobo" test

http://individual.utoronto.ca/somody/quiz.html


14/16 get at me lol


damn JGoods

I did poorly on both tests! 8/16 and 6/10! I'm bewitched by PRudd's baby blues.

I had a math professor who would lecture with actual rips in his clothing (unfortunately sad not hot), so I knew I wouldn't do well on the prof/hobo quiz

Image

eta No, Zizek wasn't my math prof. He's just what comes to mind when I think of hoboish intellectuals.
Last edited by hetookmetoamovie on Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:16 pm

sfoglia wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Just saw bills addition

We are 180 guys


YO COLONEL, I'MMA LET YOU FINISH, BUT THIS THREAD HAD ONE OF THE BEST RC OF ALL TIME. ONE OF THE BEST. RC. OF ALL TIME.

I am pretty sure we are the most clever fucking people on this planet. We are 1800.



We are 1800.

Im so glad I took a break from this Dostoyevsky rc passage 2 b a part of this

User avatar
hetookmetoamovie
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby hetookmetoamovie » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:17 pm

sfoglia wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Just saw bills addition

We are 180 guys


YO COLONEL, I'MMA LET YOU FINISH, BUT THIS THREAD HAD ONE OF THE BEST RC OF ALL TIME. ONE OF THE BEST. RC. OF ALL TIME.

I am pretty sure we are the most clever fucking people on this planet. We are 1800.


Image

User avatar
JerryLundegard
Posts: 116
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:06 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby JerryLundegard » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:21 pm

smccgrey wrote:How long have all you new people studying? Are you just finding TLS now??



Daily since early July(usually 2-4 hours a day)...Started at a 154 and up consistently into the mid 160's. Hoping for a 166+ come test day. I have known about TLS through a friend at GULC but haven't posted, or lived on here, until very recently.

But

You all are my constant motivators that I can always be doing something more until I get that score I want.

User avatar
sfoglia
Posts: 1758
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby sfoglia » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:22 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:c'mon guys someone write me a "the author would most likely agree with which one of the following statements" Q



18. The author would agree with which one of the following statements?
A) critiques that have some objective basis are always true
B) some criticism of style based objection are unwarranted
C) If what is true is not true, then that which is said to be true is doubtful
D) criticisms that seem plausible on face value, may be due to a misunderstanding of cultural history
E) the modern repertoire of common English is set in what should be included


19. In view of the author's general attitude towards disparate uses of language, the word "bombastic" can best be substituted for the word(s)
A. loquacious
B. turgid
C. orotund
D. grandiloquent
E. annoying as ever-loving shit

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Thu Sep 18, 2014 12:23 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:C) If what is true is not true, then that which is said to be true is doubtful


hetookmetoamovie wrote:Image


hetookmetoamovie wrote:Image




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: B-Mo, Greenteachurro, Pozzo, Tazewell and 16 guests