Page 281 of 508

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:00 pm
by ErgoSum
Also, anyone want to help me understand the correct answers for numbers 20 and 24 in PT65, Section 4?

<3thanks

.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:05 pm
by Gray
.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:15 pm
by ErgoSum
smccgrey wrote:
ErgoSum wrote:Also, anyone want to help me understand the correct answers for numbers 20 and 24 in PT65, Section 4?

<3thanks
LR right? Fuck I wish I just had my books with me at all times.
Yea.

Am I allowed to post the question here? I forget

.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:18 pm
by Gray
.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:22 pm
by ErgoSum
smccgrey wrote:
ErgoSum wrote:
smccgrey wrote:
ErgoSum wrote:Also, anyone want to help me understand the correct answers for numbers 20 and 24 in PT65, Section 4?

<3thanks
LR right? Fuck I wish I just had my books with me at all times.
Yea.

Am I allowed to post the question here? I forget
nope, but if you say "the one about the..." the nerdiest among us might remember the q.

"The one about the" art teachers, coloured paper vs.paint colours, and the assumption needed

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:35 pm
by dasani13
ErgoSum wrote:Also, anyone want to help me understand the correct answers for numbers 20 and 24 in PT65, Section 4?

<3thanks
I wish I could help but I suck at explaining LR. I hate #20 because they're making a comparison between 2 things so I automatically went looking for an assumption about the comparison but the assumption is just about what the use of colored paper does.

.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:36 pm
by Gray
.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:37 pm
by ErgoSum
Also, do I just need to do a ton of RC or what
ErgoSum wrote:Just did PT 65:

LR1: -0
LG: -0
RC: -8
LR2: -2

173 score


I wish I was able to read ;'[

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:39 pm
by ErgoSum
dasani13 wrote:
ErgoSum wrote:Also, anyone want to help me understand the correct answers for numbers 20 and 24 in PT65, Section 4?

<3thanks
I wish I could help but I suck at explaining LR. I hate #20 because they're making a comparison between 2 things so I automatically went looking for an assumption about the comparison but the assumption is just about what the use of colored paper does.
Just left to go to the gym, so I don't have it in front of me anymore, but thanks. I'll reread it with this in mind when I get back

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:58 pm
by GreenTee
ErgoSum wrote: "The one about the" art teachers, coloured paper vs.paint colours, and the assumption needed

Oh I love this question! (/the nerdiest among us)

The conclusion is that art teachers -- in order to teach art students about the use of color -- should use colored paper rather than paint.

Support: Because colored paper allows for precise comparison of the color's impact in varying contexts.

Necessary assumption: Precision in comparing colors across varying contexts must do something to help teach students learn about the use of color.
= answer choice D

(Edit - my post count just broke into the 170s. Big day.)

.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 1:59 pm
by Gray
.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:00 pm
by Hand
GreenTee wrote:
ErgoSum wrote: "The one about the" art teachers, coloured paper vs.paint colours, and the assumption needed

Oh I love this question! (/the nerdiest among us)

The conclusion is that art teachers -- in order to teach art students about the use of color -- should use colored paper rather than paint.

Support: Because colored paper allows for precise comparison of the color's impact in varying contexts.

Necessary assumption: Precision in comparing colors across varying contexts must do something to help teach students learn about the use of color.
= answer choice D
ohhh I remember that one now, yeah that one is horrible

.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:01 pm
by Gray
.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:03 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
smccgrey wrote:
vracovino wrote:"much-needed liberation from the constraints of logic and the processes of reasoning."
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:I had a dream that one LR section was a bunch of pictures of couches and I had to figure out the necessary assumption for each one.
Just rehashin me all over again

.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:05 pm
by Gray
.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:07 pm
by hetookmetoamovie
Are you still at Denver airport, Bill? I spent a layover there and was totally weirded out by the artwork and then I found out that it's a hotbed of wacky conspiracy theories

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Denver_Air ... acy_theory
The Denver Airport conspiracy theory refers to a collection of theories surrounding Denver International Airport (DIA) that most commonly claim the airport to be a new, secret headquarters or compound used by the Illuminati, New World Order, Neo-Nazis, or Reptoids. These claims are usually based on a vague Swastika shape that the runways and taxiways make when seen from the air, as well as murals, sculptures, and other engravings claimed to be secret code or "alien" language.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:10 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
smccgrey wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote: Just rehashin me all over again
just pointing out how you freed your mind from the constraints of logic.
Shit I ain't lettin nuttin constrain me HO

.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:12 pm
by Gray
.

Post removed.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:14 pm
by schmelling
Post removed.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:15 pm
by GreenTee
OMG someone please get a Reptar tar immediately!

.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:17 pm
by Gray
.

.

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:17 pm
by Gray
.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:18 pm
by Hand
smccgrey wrote:the google image results are pretty TTT
Image
I'm thinking of getting a lizard people tar, just need to find a good one

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:18 pm
by Rigo
:mrgreen:

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2014 2:20 pm
by GreenTee
Dirigo wrote:
MikeSpivey wrote:Guess what? Sept LSAT registrations are down!
Thought I'd pass on some Spivey knowledge that he posted today.
Looks like we are in store for an awesome cycle.
Amazing. Link?