Grey, I've never gone -0 on an RC section and I have an MA in English from a T20. There's a reason why committees don't go, "Here answer these four passages on art, history, science, and law in thirty-five minutes, and we'll give you your English Ph.D."smccgrey wrote:I haven't gone -0 on RC in so long it makes me feel illiterate.
The Official September 2014 Study Group Forum
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
- PeanutsNJam
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Yeah I realized I have to be selective in how deep I want to dig into particular questions. And I do perform much better on certain subjects over others, but I've learned that's just an issue with familiarity. I'm a bio/econ major, so I've read plenty biology and econ peer reviewed journal articles, so when it comes to science passages I feel at ease. Psychology and mentality definitely have a significant impact. Confidence matters.sfoglia wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounded like from the other post that you originally had an answer correct but then changed your mind and selected the incorrect one?PeanutsNJam wrote:In retrospect I may have overreacted. A stranger's opinion of my state of preparation (or lack thereof) should have no bearing on anything. I would like any pointers that people have regarding RC accuracy that go beyond:
- Read a lot of stuff
- Learn general strategy
- Annotate the passage
Specifically, I've noticed an approach to acing LR cannot be applied to RC, because they're different sections.
Also, something I've learned:
Pedantic analysis of semantics behind individual words in answer choices/stimulus in LR is only necessary when two answer choices are incredibly similar. In all other cases, a general approach is sufficient, and one needn't look too deep into the question.
I had something similar happen to me last night when I was drilling, where one of the words could fit, and be all-encompassing, and one definitely fit, but felt like it was lacking. The lacking one obviously was the correct choice. I think it was the difference between "compelling" and "guiding," in which guiding was right. But the passage discussed manipulation, so I was leaning toward "compelling." It was "guiding," naturally.
Anyway, my point is, with those kinds of questions, it definitely comes down to semantics and it is incredibly pedantic. But otherwise, you do have to be super general. Case in point: Those MC questions that begin every passage are horrible. They're hardly ever adequate.
Are you using packets to study RC? Do you find you do better in one subject over another?
I'm always nervous with MC questions but I've done quite well on them. IDK why. I should figure that out.
- Toby Ziegler
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 2:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Dude, I know I feel so left out when I get to work in the morning and there is 6-29 pages to read through (and I read through each post!). But here is my schedule:Colonel_funkadunk wrote:FYI u need to post moreToby Ziegler wrote:We're like a highly dysfunctional family where the family members are dispensable.
6:00 AM: wake up, shave, shower, get dressed, etc.
6:50 AM: turn on the news/SportsCenter
6:51 AM: start breakfast (just became a vegan, so cooking has become a bit more time consuming/challenging)
7:30 AM: Leave for work.
7:40 AM: start work
12:00 PM: get off work, eat lunch
12:30 PM: study for the LSAT
5:00 PM: Leave for home
5:08 PM: Arrive home
5:15 PM: play with my kids, help my wife with dinner, clean the house, start laundry, bath time, jammie time, etc.
8:30 PM: child #1 goes to bed
8:45 PM: after the house is clean we watch, How I Met Your Mother, The Office, The West Wing, something on the Food Network (Cut Throat Kitchen, Chopped, etc.), or a sporting event
10:30 PM: maybe do a few LG's or a LR section if I am not completely drained
11:15 PM: go to bed
11:45 PM: my wife joins me in bed if child #2 will let her
Well that turned out to be far more detailed than I originally intended. But that's why I only poast, in the morning/early afternoons. That's why we need a TLS reunion.
- PeanutsNJam
- Posts: 4670
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 1:57 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
It's true recent PTs are different from older PTs, but that's because each PT is slightly different. It's not a new vs old, it's PT 62 vs PT 53. Sure, they're different. Score X on 53 does not mean I'll get the same score on 10 or 70, but it also doesn't mean I'll get the same score on 52.bound wrote:...am I the only one who thinks this caution is warranted? The new tests are very different from the old tests (i.e. RC passages, Passage A vs Passage B, easier LR (imo)). It's less than 3 weeks before the real deal. I don't think his/her advice was meant to come across as snarky at all, and I agree with it, in fact.
There's no point in fretting over "different PTs", the goal is to master every type of question, every type of trap. Therefore, you want to study a diverse range of PTs, not *just* the recent ones, or *just* the similar ones, etc.
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Maybe because you've done so many MC that at this point it is kind of intuitive for you?PeanutsNJam wrote:Yeah I realized I have to be selective in how deep I want to dig into particular questions. And I do perform much better on certain subjects over others, but I've learned that's just an issue with familiarity. I'm a bio/econ major, so I've read plenty biology and econ peer reviewed journal articles, so when it comes to science passages I feel at ease. Psychology and mentality definitely have a significant impact. Confidence matters.sfoglia wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounded like from the other post that you originally had an answer correct but then changed your mind and selected the incorrect one?PeanutsNJam wrote:In retrospect I may have overreacted. A stranger's opinion of my state of preparation (or lack thereof) should have no bearing on anything. I would like any pointers that people have regarding RC accuracy that go beyond:
- Read a lot of stuff
- Learn general strategy
- Annotate the passage
Specifically, I've noticed an approach to acing LR cannot be applied to RC, because they're different sections.
Also, something I've learned:
Pedantic analysis of semantics behind individual words in answer choices/stimulus in LR is only necessary when two answer choices are incredibly similar. In all other cases, a general approach is sufficient, and one needn't look too deep into the question.
I had something similar happen to me last night when I was drilling, where one of the words could fit, and be all-encompassing, and one definitely fit, but felt like it was lacking. The lacking one obviously was the correct choice. I think it was the difference between "compelling" and "guiding," in which guiding was right. But the passage discussed manipulation, so I was leaning toward "compelling." It was "guiding," naturally.
Anyway, my point is, with those kinds of questions, it definitely comes down to semantics and it is incredibly pedantic. But otherwise, you do have to be super general. Case in point: Those MC questions that begin every passage are horrible. They're hardly ever adequate.
Are you using packets to study RC? Do you find you do better in one subject over another?
I'm always nervous with MC questions but I've done quite well on them. IDK why. I should figure that out.
Anyway, keep drilling, if only to feel like you've gained enough familiarity to be confident. I am most uncomfortable with the science passages, so I've been reviewing those heavily. I also re-do ones for which I've gotten multiple answers incorrect. Can't hurt. Do five passages a night or something. I have a lot of faith that within the next few weeks, you'll get comfortable down to -2 or less on RC. Clearly your understanding IS there, and it's just a matter of being able to correctly "guess" what answer LSAC prefers.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Toby Ziegler
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 2:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
One of my mentors who happened to attend SLS said that 2 weeks prior to his sitting for the test he read an essay from a philosopher in one of his philosophy classes (I want to say it was Kant, but I can't remember), and then a snippet from that same essay, which they had analyzed ad nauseum in class, was one of the passages on that LSAT. He said once he realized what he was reading he skipped straight to the questions and had them done in ~2.5 mins. He scored 99th percentile and later graduated Order of the Coif, so he probably would have done well anyways, but man wouldn't that be awesome?!sfoglia wrote:Grey, I've never gone -0 on an RC section and I have an MA in English from a T20. There's a reason why committees don't go, "Here answer these four passages on art, history, science, and law in thirty-five minutes, and we'll give you your English Ph.D."smccgrey wrote:I haven't gone -0 on RC in so long it makes me feel illiterate.
- chimera
- Posts: 133
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2014 10:22 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
I agree. A quick google search shows that most if not all people agree there is a difference in the feel between older and newer tests. There is more to it, but off the top of my head there are rule-sub questions for LG, the new LG layout, for LR there are no more 1 stim/2 question, certain question types are more popular in newer tests, and RC has already been addressed. I don't think there's a meaningful difference in difficulty between older than newer but the consensus I've seen is that the structural/rhetorical changes to the test are enough to warrant using newer tests closer to the test date. Solid advice imobound wrote:PeanutsNJam wrote:I already got a 170 in Oct of 2012. The difference in difficulty between newer and older PTs is significantly overrated. Your singular anecdotal evidence is not sufficient to invalidate the fact that there is no consistent increase in the curve between PT54-72. I would go so far as to argue that Post 2007 tests are easier because comparative reading is much easier than the classic passage format.thequigley wrote:Peanuts...I hope you are much further along than PT 54. I didn't miss any on some of these old tests for reading comp and miss some on the newer tests. I thought the cake walk was one of the easiest reading sections I did.
As far as LG and LR, those are different, too. I hope you've done a more recent test. I wouldn't gauge the older ones as proof of 180 or 170.
I will give you that if I were more careless and paid less attention to detail, I would have gotten the cake walk questions right. I chose those answers first but eliminated them for the reasons given.
Edit -
I was curious if your condescension was at all justified or warranted, so I went through your post history.
Really? Didn't miss any on some RC on the older ones? Really? Did you just go -10 or something on LR and LG? Get off your high horse.29: 152
30: 154
31: 154
32: 155
33: 156
34: 153
35: 158
36: 157
37: 159
38: 157
52: 157
53: 160
54: 160
55: 160
56: 161
57: 159
58: 164
59: 165
60: 166
...am I the only one who thinks this caution is warranted? The new tests are very different from the old tests (i.e. RC passages, Passage A vs Passage B, easier LR (imo)). It's less than 3 weeks before the real deal. I don't think his/her advice was meant to come across as snarky at all, and I agree with it, in fact.
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
First of all, CHILDREN. Really admire your ability to balance LSAT with a family.Toby Ziegler wrote:Dude, I know I feel so left out when I get to work in the morning and there is 6-29 pages to read through (and I read through each post!). But here is my schedule:Colonel_funkadunk wrote:FYI u need to post moreToby Ziegler wrote:We're like a highly dysfunctional family where the family members are dispensable.
6:00 AM: wake up, shave, shower, get dressed, etc.
6:50 AM: turn on the news/SportsCenter
6:51 AM: start breakfast (just became a vegan, so cooking has become a bit more time consuming/challenging)
7:30 AM: Leave for work.
7:40 AM: start work
12:00 PM: get off work, eat lunch
12:30 PM: study for the LSAT
5:00 PM: Leave for home
5:08 PM: Arrive home
5:15 PM: play with my kids, help my wife with dinner, clean the house, start laundry, bath time, jammie time, etc.
8:30 PM: child #1 goes to bed
8:45 PM: after the house is clean we watch, How I Met Your Mother, The Office, The West Wing, something on the Food Network (Cut Throat Kitchen, Chopped, etc.), or a sporting event
10:30 PM: maybe do a few LG's or a LR section if I am not completely drained
11:15 PM: go to bed
11:45 PM: my wife joins me in bed if child #2 will let her
Well that turned out to be far more detailed than I originally intended. But that's why I only poast, in the morning/early afternoons. That's why we need a TLS reunion.
- BillPackets
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
toby y r u vegan
- sfoglia
- Posts: 1767
- Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
I actually have been familiar with all of the literature passages, and that helps a lot. It can be a bit distracting, though, when I really love the topic (Kate Chopin!! Willa Cather!!) and get completely lost in my thoughts, reading the passage as though I were doing so on my own personal time for my own studies.Toby Ziegler wrote:One of my mentors who happened to attend SLS said that 2 weeks prior to his sitting for the test he read an essay from a philosopher in one of his philosophy classes (I want to say it was Kant, but I can't remember), and then a snippet from that same essay, which they had analyzed ad nauseum in class, was one of the passages on that LSAT. He said once he realized what he was reading he skipped straight to the questions and had them done in ~2.5 mins. He scored 99th percentile and later graduated Order of the Coif, so he probably would have done well anyways, but man wouldn't that be awesome?!sfoglia wrote:Grey, I've never gone -0 on an RC section and I have an MA in English from a T20. There's a reason why committees don't go, "Here answer these four passages on art, history, science, and law in thirty-five minutes, and we'll give you your English Ph.D."smccgrey wrote:I haven't gone -0 on RC in so long it makes me feel illiterate.
Is there a Kant passage? I hate Kant. You know what I called him while studying his categorical imperative? Rhymes with "runt."
- BillPackets
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
im genuinely curious about t20 in the english MA world. is there really a thing as "t(insert # here)" outside of law schools is there bigEnglish?sfoglia wrote:I have an MA in English from a T20.
- hetookmetoamovie
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
sfoglia wrote:
Is there a Kant passage? I hate Kant. You know what I called him while studying his categorical imperative? Rhymes with "runt."
Sfogs Kant even.
Thanks! I'll be here all week. Tip your waitress.
- hetookmetoamovie
- Posts: 620
- Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
How old are your kids, Toby? Also, do you have Veganomicon? I'm not vegan, but I've learned a lot about cooking from that book. It's wonderful.Toby Ziegler wrote:Dude, I know I feel so left out when I get to work in the morning and there is 6-29 pages to read through (and I read through each post!). But here is my schedule:Colonel_funkadunk wrote:FYI u need to post moreToby Ziegler wrote:We're like a highly dysfunctional family where the family members are dispensable.
6:00 AM: wake up, shave, shower, get dressed, etc.
6:50 AM: turn on the news/SportsCenter
6:51 AM: start breakfast (just became a vegan, so cooking has become a bit more time consuming/challenging)
7:30 AM: Leave for work.
7:40 AM: start work
12:00 PM: get off work, eat lunch
12:30 PM: study for the LSAT
5:00 PM: Leave for home
5:08 PM: Arrive home
5:15 PM: play with my kids, help my wife with dinner, clean the house, start laundry, bath time, jammie time, etc.
8:30 PM: child #1 goes to bed
8:45 PM: after the house is clean we watch, How I Met Your Mother, The Office, The West Wing, something on the Food Network (Cut Throat Kitchen, Chopped, etc.), or a sporting event
10:30 PM: maybe do a few LG's or a LR section if I am not completely drained
11:15 PM: go to bed
11:45 PM: my wife joins me in bed if child #2 will let her
Well that turned out to be far more detailed than I originally intended. But that's why I only poast, in the morning/early afternoons. That's why we need a TLS reunion.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Not even LSAC is so cruel as to have an actual passage from Kant on the test. But there could def. be a passage that discusses Kant. I either haven't done it or don't remember it, tho.
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
also, good morning everyone. my weirdest dream as of late was an end-of-the-world dream in which I was on a titanic-like ship. I was a talking cat playing cards with some other talking cats while the tsunami's raged outside. Someone (a human) tried to take our (the talking cat's) cheese, so I stabbed him in the neck with a pencil, pinning him to the wall. That I used a pencil suffices to have this qualify as an LSAT dream, no?
- BillPackets
- Posts: 2176
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
movie for TLS comedian-in-chiefhetookmetoamovie wrote:Sfogs Kant even.
Thanks! I'll be here all week. Tip your waitress.
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
OMG that's hilarioushetookmetoamovie wrote:sfoglia wrote:
Is there a Kant passage? I hate Kant. You know what I called him while studying his categorical imperative? Rhymes with "runt."
Sfogs Kant even.
Thanks! I'll be here all week. Tip your waitress.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Yea that makes a lot of sense Toby, that's awesome tho. I only have my son every other weekend, and those 2-3 days I can barely study/TLS consistently so I def feel where u r coming from. Couldn't imagine full time along with everything elsesfoglia wrote:First of all, CHILDREN. Really admire your ability to balance LSAT with a family.Toby Ziegler wrote:Dude, I know I feel so left out when I get to work in the morning and there is 6-29 pages to read through (and I read through each post!). But here is my schedule:Colonel_funkadunk wrote:FYI u need to post moreToby Ziegler wrote:We're like a highly dysfunctional family where the family members are dispensable.
6:00 AM: wake up, shave, shower, get dressed, etc.
6:50 AM: turn on the news/SportsCenter
6:51 AM: start breakfast (just became a vegan, so cooking has become a bit more time consuming/challenging)
7:30 AM: Leave for work.
7:40 AM: start work
12:00 PM: get off work, eat lunch
12:30 PM: study for the LSAT
5:00 PM: Leave for home
5:08 PM: Arrive home
5:15 PM: play with my kids, help my wife with dinner, clean the house, start laundry, bath time, jammie time, etc.
8:30 PM: child #1 goes to bed
8:45 PM: after the house is clean we watch, How I Met Your Mother, The Office, The West Wing, something on the Food Network (Cut Throat Kitchen, Chopped, etc.), or a sporting event
10:30 PM: maybe do a few LG's or a LR section if I am not completely drained
11:15 PM: go to bed
11:45 PM: my wife joins me in bed if child #2 will let her
Well that turned out to be far more detailed than I originally intended. But that's why I only poast, in the morning/early afternoons. That's why we need a TLS reunion.
- Colonel_funkadunk
- Posts: 3248
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
BillPackets wrote:im genuinely curious about t20 in the english MA world. is there really a thing as "t(insert # here)" outside of law schools is there bigEnglish?sfoglia wrote:I have an MA in English from a T20.
MidRHETORIC
- Toby Ziegler
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 2:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
A mix of a few reasons, I have eaten pretty unhealthily for a lot of years and it was time to make a lifestyle change. My wife is in great shape (like 5'3" 120 lbs. after having two kids and her biggest health concern right now is that she can't see her 6-pack anymore) and enjoys running, more intense hiking, and other stuff of that nature that I have no desire to do because of my fat-ness. And I really want to do those things with her. I don't want to be the guy who dies on his family at like 55 y/o because I didn't have the self control to eat right and exercise. Moreover, the lack of ethical treatment to animals is the other major contributing factor. Now, I am not a preachy judg-y vegan that will piss in your cheerios because I feel superior, for I don't. And I still crave meat so hard and wish I could have a fatty serving of chicken fettuccine Alfredo.BillPackets wrote:toby y r u vegan
If it weren't for my ethical concerns I would have more than likely adopted a lean meat diet and exercise, but I just felt like "going all in" on this. Because I let myself get to the point that I am now (which as I go back and read this makes me sound like one of those people who can't get out of their beds, and that is definitely not me) a drastic change was necessary.
TL;DR I am fat and I love animals.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1016
- Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 9:33 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
I'm very proud of you!!!Toby Ziegler wrote:A mix of a few reasons, I have eaten pretty unhealthily for a lot of years and it was time to make a lifestyle change. My wife is in great shape (like 5'3" 120 lbs. after having two kids and her biggest health concern right now is that she can't see her 6-pack anymore) and enjoys running, more intense hiking, and other stuff of that nature that I have no desire to do because of my fat-ness. And I really want to do those things with her. I don't want to be the guy who dies on his family at like 55 y/o because I didn't have the self control to eat right and exercise. Moreover, the lack of ethical treatment to animals is the other major contributing factor. Now, I am not a preachy judg-y vegan that will piss in your cheerios because I feel superior, for I don't. And I still crave meat so hard and wish I could have a fatty serving of chicken fettuccine Alfredo.BillPackets wrote:toby y r u vegan
If it weren't for my ethical concerns I would have more than likely adopted a lean meat diet and exercise, but I just felt like "going all in" on this. Because I let myself get to the point that I am now (which as I go back and read this makes me sound like one of those people who can't get out of their beds, and that is definitely not me) a drastic change was necessary.
TL;DR I am fat and I love animals.
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
HATE HATE HATE the groundworksmccgrey wrote:Ugh. Kant.hereisonehand wrote:Not even LSAC is so cruel as to have an actual passage from Kant on the test. But there could def. be a passage that discusses Kant. I either haven't done it or don't remember it, tho.
Last edited by Hand on Tue Sep 09, 2014 12:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
Go Toby! I was vegan at one point for about a year or so. Then I remembered how much I love cheese. And eggs. And butter.Toby Ziegler wrote:A mix of a few reasons, I have eaten pretty unhealthily for a lot of years and it was time to make a lifestyle change. My wife is in great shape (like 5'3" 120 lbs. after having two kids and her biggest health concern right now is that she can't see her 6-pack anymore) and enjoys running, more intense hiking, and other stuff of that nature that I have no desire to do because of my fat-ness. And I really want to do those things with her. I don't want to be the guy who dies on his family at like 55 y/o because I didn't have the self control to eat right and exercise. Moreover, the lack of ethical treatment to animals is the other major contributing factor. Now, I am not a preachy judg-y vegan that will piss in your cheerios because I feel superior, for I don't. And I still crave meat so hard and wish I could have a fatty serving of chicken fettuccine Alfredo.BillPackets wrote:toby y r u vegan
If it weren't for my ethical concerns I would have more than likely adopted a lean meat diet and exercise, but I just felt like "going all in" on this. Because I let myself get to the point that I am now (which as I go back and read this makes me sound like one of those people who can't get out of their beds, and that is definitely not me) a drastic change was necessary.
TL;DR I am fat and I love animals.
- Toby Ziegler
- Posts: 701
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 2:59 pm
Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group
We don't have it, but will definitely check it out. We're pretty new to this and we both come from farming ancestry, so our folks and grandparents were just meat and potato eaters.hetookmetoamovie wrote:How old are your kids, Toby? Also, do you have Veganomicon? I'm not vegan, but I've learned a lot about cooking from that book. It's wonderful.Toby Ziegler wrote:Dude, I know I feel so left out when I get to work in the morning and there is 6-29 pages to read through (and I read through each post!). But here is my schedule:Colonel_funkadunk wrote:FYI u need to post moreToby Ziegler wrote:We're like a highly dysfunctional family where the family members are dispensable.
6:00 AM: wake up, shave, shower, get dressed, etc.
6:50 AM: turn on the news/SportsCenter
6:51 AM: start breakfast (just became a vegan, so cooking has become a bit more time consuming/challenging)
7:30 AM: Leave for work.
7:40 AM: start work
12:00 PM: get off work, eat lunch
12:30 PM: study for the LSAT
5:00 PM: Leave for home
5:08 PM: Arrive home
5:15 PM: play with my kids, help my wife with dinner, clean the house, start laundry, bath time, jammie time, etc.
8:30 PM: child #1 goes to bed
8:45 PM: after the house is clean we watch, How I Met Your Mother, The Office, The West Wing, something on the Food Network (Cut Throat Kitchen, Chopped, etc.), or a sporting event
10:30 PM: maybe do a few LG's or a LR section if I am not completely drained
11:15 PM: go to bed
11:45 PM: my wife joins me in bed if child #2 will let her
Well that turned out to be far more detailed than I originally intended. But that's why I only poast, in the morning/early afternoons. That's why we need a TLS reunion.
PM'd about the kids -- they're going in my PS so I will try to remain somewhat anonymous.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login