Page 170 of 508

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 9:57 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
flash21 wrote:can someone aware me on jcrew?


J. Crew is whereby bill contracted his "bill the bully" nickname

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:04 pm
by BillPackets
Image

Any1 ever used 1 of these?

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:07 pm
by Louis1127
is that some kind of torture device

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:09 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
Louis1127 wrote:is that some kind of torture device

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:10 pm
by BillPackets
No it's the latest technology in DIY neurological cognitive betterment

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:18 pm
by Gray
BillPackets wrote:No it's the latest technology in DIY neurological cognitive betterment

Use with aforementioned Soviet psychosis meds and report back plz.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:21 pm
by BillPackets
smccgrey wrote:
BillPackets wrote:No it's the latest technology in DIY neurological cognitive betterment

Use with aforementioned Soviet psychosis meds and report back plz.


http://www.radiolab.org/story/9-volt-nirvana/

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:23 pm
by BillPackets
Also I would buy that right now except it's $90 and I just moved and don't get paid until the end of the month

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:37 pm
by schmelling
Just took my like 3 hours to get through 70 flaw/method questions. Very unfocused at night lately. Glad I was at least able to keep my ass in the chair for the whole problem set.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 10:52 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
BillPackets wrote:
smccgrey wrote:
BillPackets wrote:No it's the latest technology in DIY neurological cognitive betterment

Use with aforementioned Soviet psychosis meds and report back plz.


http://www.radiolab.org/story/9-volt-nirvana/


I just split my phone charger open and touched my tongue to the electricity

Update: worked great

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:05 pm
by Toby Ziegler
Well the weekend was productive, but not as productive as I would have wanted. Between a family reunion and 1800 miles of driving with 2 kids under 3 each I still feel pretty good. Back to trying to shore up my dramatically neglected LG. I feel like I focused too much on LR and didn't leave enough time to perfect LG. Any tips besides drilling as nauseum (that's the plan for right now)?

I didn't go back and read the 25 pages that this thread jumped in my absence. What are the highlights?

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:09 pm
by BillPackets
BillPackets wrote:Image

Any1 ever used 1 of these?


The only relevant highlight

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:10 pm
by Toby Ziegler
BillPackets wrote:
BillPackets wrote:Image

Any1 ever used 1 of these?


The only relevant highlight

Seems legit. Does one attach that to their body? Count me in.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:12 pm
by BillPackets
They both attach to your head and it makes you a genius

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:22 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
Toby Ziegler wrote:
I didn't go back and read the 25 pages that this thread jumped in my absence. What are the highlights?


Beyoncé, a sorting cap, a fake letter from j. Crew, a lil LSAT, deciding what to wear to the LSAT and a drawing from grey regarding Yale or something of the sort

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:32 pm
by BillPackets
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Toby Ziegler wrote:
I didn't go back and read the 25 pages that this thread jumped in my absence. What are the highlights?


Beyoncé, a sorting cap, a fake letter from j. Crew, a lil LSAT, deciding what to wear to the LSAT and a drawing from grey regarding Yale or something of the sort


Oh yeah the croquet that was bomb we should have a sept thread IRL meet up n play croquet

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:35 pm
by Toby Ziegler
BillPackets wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Toby Ziegler wrote:
I didn't go back and read the 25 pages that this thread jumped in my absence. What are the highlights?


Beyoncé, a sorting cap, a fake letter from j. Crew, a lil LSAT, deciding what to wear to the LSAT and a drawing from grey regarding Yale or something of the sort


Oh yeah the croquet that was bomb we should have a sept thread IRL meet up n play croquet

I am down for the meet-up. Grey never ceases to inspire and amaze. I will be wearing a comfy pair of khakis (pronounced the same way I will pronounce "car keys" if I get into Harvard), shirt, and tie. As for Beyonce I don't know much, and must therefore suspend judgement.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:54 pm
by Louis1127
pt 61 tmrw b4 work.

I always have trouble falling asleep after weekends on Sunday nights, and since this was a long weekend, I will likely have trouble falling asleep tonight, and I must take the test early tmrw before class/work/real responsibilities, so tmrw will be good to see how I test on limited sleep.

Here's to a productive week everyone.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 12:00 am
by Louis1127
sfoglia wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
I love you

Louis1127 wrote:Do u want to go out on a date sometime?

Also, no one's hair looks good right out of bed, so no reason for that to make you sad :mrgreen:


Aww, you're both very nice.


Louis, if you score high enough on your LSAT, then we can date.


Is this like relative to where I am PTing before test day, or is there like a 170 cut off or something?

Post removed.

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 2:52 am
by mornincounselor
Post removed.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:31 am
by ghostofdreams
mornincounselor wrote:To the question re 7sage vs lsatqa I prefer 7sage. They classify the problems by difficulty and if you take a test then watch the video for a game you will see immediately under the video what choices you made on questions that game.

Or one could use one site for their initial scores and use the other for subsequent attempts or for blind review.


I checked out LSATqa again today. They classify difficulty but you're right, 7sage has the videos for LG right there. However, I think I might stick with LSATqa just because it seems to do the trick, and I ought to really just move on. Isn't it, though, time consuming to enter in all the answers?

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:37 am
by ghostofdreams
smccgrey wrote:The pot thing is definitely an unwarranted stereotype, but BC is unsurprisingly our version of Oregon. And Alberta is our Texas.


I listened to an interview with Graeme Blake about Canada and the LSAT, and he said the LSAT is not as important as it is in the States. GPA is more important. He also said that Canadians who take the LSAT can get in the best Canadian schools with a score in the 150s. Since you are, I"m assuming, focused on the LSAT, are you trying to get into an American law school?

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 5:34 am
by boris09
Sorry for the slightly more on-topic post, but:

PT 57

LG: 22/23 (so i finally experienced the infamous muave dino game. If i hadn't made the quick decision to finish the last game before i began the dino game, i may not have had time to finish. Needed almost 15 minutes to do it, with one question being a plug and chug)
LR1: 19/26 (sigh lol)
LR2: 21/25 (not bad, i can deal)
RC: 21/27 (i suppose i can deal too)

165. (83/101)

Thoughts: quite happy with the logic games, as it seems to be fairly consistent now. For some reason i still haven't gotten a perfect LG score though! It's almost as if i have to get one easy question wrong. In terms of the RC, given that my average was -9 to -11 about three weeks ago, i'm really happy to be down to a -6. To be honest, i think i can get my target score as long as i don't do any worse than -7 in this section. Now, on to the LR. A few weeks ago i was at a point where i had never gotten under -5 for an LR section. However, as i've began doing full preptests, i've noticed myself doing better than i ever had before, averaging -2 to -4. This, of course, comes with a sacrifice. While I have been doing better than i ever have before on an individual-section basis, on the other LR section of the test i do much, much worse. I understand that the LSAT balances the test by making one section a bit tougher sometimes, but i really hope i can just fix this inconsistency issue, and get at least 2 or 3 right on the section i do worse in. With only 4 more points i could have gotten my goal score. Haven't had the chance to do intense studying for the past few days until today, but i'm really hoping that i can go into overdrive mode and get these last few points in crunch time

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:24 am
by ErgoSum
LSAT 60. Here goes nothing

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2014 7:29 am
by ErgoSum
boris09 wrote:Sorry for the slightly more on-topic post, but:

PT 57

LG: 22/23 (so i finally experienced the infamous muave dino game. If i hadn't made the quick decision to finish the last game before i began the dino game, i may not have had time to finish. Needed almost 15 minutes to do it, with one question being a plug and chug)
LR1: 19/26 (sigh lol)
LR2: 21/25 (not bad, i can deal)
RC: 21/27 (i suppose i can deal too)

165. (83/101)

Thoughts: quite happy with the logic games, as it seems to be fairly consistent now. For some reason i still haven't gotten a perfect LG score though! It's almost as if i have to get one easy question wrong. In terms of the RC, given that my average was -9 to -11 about three weeks ago, i'm really happy to be down to a -6. To be honest, i think i can get my target score as long as i don't do any worse than -7 in this section. Now, on to the LR. A few weeks ago i was at a point where i had never gotten under -5 for an LR section. However, as i've began doing full preptests, i've noticed myself doing better than i ever had before, averaging -2 to -4. This, of course, comes with a sacrifice. While I have been doing better than i ever have before on an individual-section basis, on the other LR section of the test i do much, much worse. I understand that the LSAT balances the test by making one section a bit tougher sometimes, but i really hope i can just fix this inconsistency issue, and get at least 2 or 3 right on the section i do worse in. With only 4 more points i could have gotten my goal score. Haven't had the chance to do intense studying for the past few days until today, but i'm really hoping that i can go into overdrive mode and get these last few points in crunch time




You can do it!