The Official September 2014 Study Group

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:05 pm

BillPackets wrote:
BillPackets wrote: wtf dude


KAYCEE wrote: Oh, and I'm a girl.


girls are dudes too.


Kaycee don't mind bill he's notorious for being misogynistic prejudiced a-wad

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Postby Gray » Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:09 pm

.

User avatar
Superstaranonymous

New
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 2:29 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Superstaranonymous » Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:42 pm

.
Last edited by Superstaranonymous on Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:14 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
rwe13

New
Posts: 77
Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 2:23 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby rwe13 » Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:48 pm

Superstaranonymous wrote:So I've recently experienced a revelation in my studies but am still in dire need of advice

RC has been by far the bane of my LSAT experience.

I decided to throw caution to the wind about 2 weeks ago and just speed through my initial read. Instead of a bunch of underlining, boxing and writing in the margins I elected to just underline the conclusion statements, then bracket and arrow the supporting evidence to them.

By doing this and just skipping the really lengthy questions, I've gone from averaging between -8 and -10 to -4 to -6 on my RC sections.

If I can consistently stay under -2 LG, I've got a real shot of finally averaging in the mid to high 160s (though I've set the bar for myself a bit higher)

Does anyone have any relevant advice on RC so I can get as close to -0 as possible? I'm focusing on getting my initial read under 2m 30s by drilling, which would give me about an extra minute per passage, but there is still the problem of tackling the lengthy problems without losing too much time. Any advice would be appreciated.


Love the homage to Bird... I definitely agree with your strategy. As soon as I stopped marking up RC and just read it, quickly, straight through, I went from -5, -7 to -2, -1.

User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Fri Aug 22, 2014 12:49 pm

Superstaranonymous wrote:So I've recently experienced a revelation in my studies but am still in dire need of advice

RC has been by far the bane of my LSAT experience.

I decided to throw caution to the wind about 2 weeks ago and just speed through my initial read. Instead of a bunch of underlining, boxing and writing in the margins I elected to just underline the conclusion statements, then bracket and arrow the supporting evidence to them.

By doing this and just skipping the really lengthy questions, I've gone from averaging between -8 and -10 to -4 to -6 on my RC sections.

If I can consistently stay under -2 LG, I've got a real shot of finally averaging in the mid to high 160s (though I've set the bar for myself a bit higher)

Does anyone have any relevant advice on RC so I can get as close to -0 as possible? I'm focusing on getting my initial read under 2m 30s by drilling, which would give me about an extra minute per passage, but there is still the problem of tackling the lengthy problems without losing too much time. Any advice would be appreciated.


Just gotta read for structure.

More importantly, love the tar. Larry Bird circa 1976.

Edit: scooped re: bird

User avatar
vracovino

Bronze
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri Jun 07, 2013 2:46 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby vracovino » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:16 pm

So I've posted this here recently but my PTs are all over the place! My high is a 169, my low a 160. I average lower 160s.

I have a 3.9+ GPA so I'm shooting for the best I can do. I'm also just starting classes now- 15 credit hours- and its not an insufferable amount of work but it s another distraction. Should I sit for September or postpone? What do you guys think?

HRomanus

Silver
Posts: 1307
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:45 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby HRomanus » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:17 pm

vracovino wrote:So I've posted this here recently but my PTs are all over the place! My high is a 169, my low a 160. I average lower 160s.

I have a 3.9+ GPA so I'm shooting for the best I can do. I'm also just starting classes now- 15 credit hours- and its not an insufferable amount of work but it s another distraction. Should I sit for September or postpone? What do you guys think?


You typically score lower than your PT average in the real test, so consider that. If you want a high 160s, don't take when your average is low 160s.

User avatar
Superstaranonymous

New
Posts: 53
Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 2:29 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Superstaranonymous » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:28 pm

.
Last edited by Superstaranonymous on Tue Jul 28, 2015 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
pdt1765

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:28 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby pdt1765 » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:32 pm

Has anyone done the LR problem about earth 19th century houses with wide and narrow floorboards? Can anyone explain the answer to that one? I did it in the Princeton Review book 301 page 223. Thanks for the help

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:35 pm

pdt1765 wrote:Has anyone done the LR problem about earth 19th century houses with wide and narrow floorboards? Can anyone explain the answer to that one? I did it in the Princeton Review book 301 page 223. Thanks for the help


Does it say the pt it's from and question number ? I remember the problem but don't remember where to find it

User avatar
pdt1765

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 8:28 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby pdt1765 » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:37 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
pdt1765 wrote:Has anyone done the LR problem about earth 19th century houses with wide and narrow floorboards? Can anyone explain the answer to that one? I did it in the Princeton Review book 301 page 223. Thanks for the help


Does it say the pt it's from and question number ? I remember the problem but don't remember where to find it


PT40-S3-Q2

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Postby Gray » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:43 pm

.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:54 pm

Wut schools r y'all gunnin for if September is a success

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Postby Gray » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:54 pm

.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Fri Aug 22, 2014 1:57 pm

smccgrey wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Wut schools r y'all gunnin for if September is a success

Yale, duh.

Just kidding. GULC. Gimme dat law center.


Lol

A law center is a whole new level of prestige, right

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Postby Gray » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:02 pm

.

User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:10 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Wut schools r y'all gunnin for if September is a success


midwestern t3 CMN, or any t14. preferable one of CMN, VD on the periphery, Vandy in the mix too.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:17 pm

smccgrey wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
smccgrey wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Wut schools r y'all gunnin for if September is a success

Yale, duh.

Just kidding. GULC. Gimme dat law center.


Lol

A law center is a whole new level of prestige, right


I think you mean preftige.

But seriously though I would really, really like to go Georgetown, preferably with some money to sweeten the deal.


$$ is always sweet. Y not other t14s, your PTs are so high ?

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:18 pm

BillPackets wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Wut schools r y'all gunnin for if September is a success


midwestern t3 CMN, or any t14. preferable one of CMN, VD on the periphery, Vandy in the mix too.


U finna berk?

HRomanus

Silver
Posts: 1307
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:45 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby HRomanus » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:19 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Wut schools r y'all gunnin for if September is a success


Average PT makes me competitive in T14, but I really want to stay in my region.
Last edited by HRomanus on Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:21 pm

HRomanus wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Wut schools r y'all gunnin for if September is a success


Duke is my target, but my average PT (173.8) makes me competitive for everything but Yale and Stanford (excluding YPs). So if that happens, I'd gun largely for the best COA. But the specifics are something I'll debate once I get my score back. I'll definitely be posting in the "Choosing" subtopic here when the time comes.


GPA? 173 with 3.8x+ makes comp 4 stAnford

HRomanus

Silver
Posts: 1307
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 8:45 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby HRomanus » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:22 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
HRomanus wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Wut schools r y'all gunnin for if September is a success


Duke is my target, but my average PT (173.8) makes me competitive for everything but Yale and Stanford (excluding YPs). So if that happens, I'd gun largely for the best COA. But the specifics are something I'll debate once I get my score back. I'll definitely be posting in the "Choosing" subtopic here when the time comes.


GPA? 173 with 3.8x+ makes comp 4 stAnford


I plugged it into mylsn.info and it spit out a 53% chance. In any case, I'm staying on the East Coast.
Last edited by HRomanus on Fri Aug 22, 2014 6:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ilikebaseball » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:22 pm

UT with good $ is the goal.

User avatar
Toby Ziegler

Silver
Posts: 701
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 2:59 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Toby Ziegler » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:24 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:Wut schools r y'all gunnin for if September is a success

I will qualify for max need-based aid, so Stanford is my top school, but seeing as HLS has relatively predictable admissions process I am really gunning for a 173. Outside of HYS I think UVa is on top of the list. Will retake anything lower than a 171. I don't ever think about Yale. I will just apply and see what the black box spits out.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Fri Aug 22, 2014 2:26 pm

ilikebaseball wrote:UT with good $ is the goal.


I saw u post about ut on median thread 2, from tx?



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests