The Official September 2014 Study Group

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:47 pm

ErgoSum wrote:
thequigley wrote:
BillPackets wrote:
thequigley wrote:a little nervous. but not really giving a fuk right now.

i thot maybe u foe'd me quiggers cuz u never responded to nething i said the other day so glad that u r here today



Bill i like to make you think i dont care.

ergo swoops in w the crucial LSAT like notice of wording

User avatar
thequigley
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:43 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby thequigley » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:49 pm

BillPackets wrote:
thequigley wrote:Bill i like to make you think i dont care.

the psychology of quiggers is a weird 1 idk y u would want to make me think u dont care

inb4 u say something like 'well Bill obviously you care that I wasn't responding'


Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:50 pm

thequigley wrote:
BillPackets wrote:
thequigley wrote:Bill i like to make you think i dont care.

the psychology of quiggers is a weird 1 idk y u would want to make me think u dont care

inb4 u say something like 'well Bill obviously you care that I wasn't responding'


Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?


Sup quigz

User avatar
Hand
Posts: 3521
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Hand » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:51 pm

anybody got some fake scores to report now that the quigz is here?

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:52 pm

thequigley wrote:Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?


thequigley wrote:You, sir, are an idiot! :D

User avatar
thequigley
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:43 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby thequigley » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:53 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
thequigley wrote:
BillPackets wrote:
thequigley wrote:Bill i like to make you think i dont care.

the psychology of quiggers is a weird 1 idk y u would want to make me think u dont care

inb4 u say something like 'well Bill obviously you care that I wasn't responding'


Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?


Sup quigz


Keeping it real, colonel. you? ready to crush?

User avatar
hetookmetoamovie
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby hetookmetoamovie » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:54 pm

hereisonehand wrote:anybody got some fake scores to report now that the quigz is here?

Image

User avatar
ErgoSum
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ErgoSum » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:54 pm

Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

User avatar
hetookmetoamovie
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby hetookmetoamovie » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:55 pm

ErgoSum wrote:Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

180
(more apropos than usual)

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:56 pm

manillabay wrote:Almost done finishing drilling all LR by type. I am doing a lot better than I was when I started out. I'm anticipating May 10th to see if my hard work will actually result in a better score.

quigz real talk r u manilla bay

User avatar
thequigley
Posts: 122
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 11:43 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby thequigley » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:58 pm

BillPackets wrote:
manillabay wrote:Almost done finishing drilling all LR by type. I am doing a lot better than I was when I started out. I'm anticipating May 10th to see if my hard work will actually result in a better score.

quigz real talk r u manilla bay


are you black Tom Trump Supporter Brady?

User avatar
Hand
Posts: 3521
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Hand » Wed Sep 24, 2014 3:58 pm

ErgoSum wrote:Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5


not bad should be a 179 shoe-in for you Ergo, but how did you miss 2 on LG? don't you know its the #mostlearnablesection? should've done a lil more drillin for that 180

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:01 pm

ErgoSum wrote:Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

way2goergo

User avatar
ErgoSum
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ErgoSum » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:01 pm

hereisonehand wrote:
ErgoSum wrote:Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5


not bad should be a 179 shoe-in for you Ergo, but how did you miss 2 on LG? don't you know its the #mostlearnablesection? should've done a lil more drillin for that 180


The thing is I ended up getting two more correct than was allowed, so somehow there is a point where you learn a section so much it becomes a detriment

User avatar
Hand
Posts: 3521
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Hand » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:05 pm

ErgoSum wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:
ErgoSum wrote:Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5


not bad should be a 179 shoe-in for you Ergo, but how did you miss 2 on LG? don't you know its the #mostlearnablesection? should've done a lil more drillin for that 180


The thing is I ended up getting two more correct than was allowed, so somehow there is a point where you learn a section so much it becomes a detriment


damn you overdrilled that MF
hope you can undo some of that damage before saturday

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:07 pm

thequigley wrote:
thequigley wrote:
BillPackets wrote:
thequigley wrote:Bill i like to make you think i dont care.

the psychology of quiggers is a weird 1 idk y u would want to make me think u dont care

inb4 u say something like 'well Bill obviously you care that I wasn't responding'


Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?




Keeping it real, colonel. you? ready to crush?



ALWAYS READY 2 SMASH

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:08 pm

ErgoSum wrote:Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5


You are very necessary ITT

User avatar
ErgoSum
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ErgoSum » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:15 pm

Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
ErgoSum wrote:


You are very necessary ITT

Image

ilikebaseball
Posts: 4103
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ilikebaseball » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:21 pm

for anyone that's done Cambridge's "most difficult passages" for RC, do you personally think that those passages are harder than the passages from 65 til now? I think it only covers the most difficult ones from 1-40 (they're still really hard, but just want a general consensus)

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:24 pm

ilikebaseball wrote:for anyone that's done Cambridge's "most difficult passages" for RC, do you personally think that those passages are harder than the passages from 65 til now? I think it only covers the most difficult ones from 1-40 (they're still really hard, but just want a general consensus)

kinda hard 2 tell cuz i think sum of the most difficult passages r comparative reading which obvs r not covered in the 1-40 packets but overall idk they're prolly similar

User avatar
Gray
Posts: 5989
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Gray » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:31 pm

BillPackets wrote:
ilikebaseball wrote:for anyone that's done Cambridge's "most difficult passages" for RC, do you personally think that those passages are harder than the passages from 65 til now? I think it only covers the most difficult ones from 1-40 (they're still really hard, but just want a general consensus)

kinda hard 2 tell cuz i think sum of the most difficult passages r comparative reading which obvs r not covered in the 1-40 packets but overall idk they're prolly similar

I also think difficulty is relative. Sfogs might like the Kate Chopin passage, and I might like the one about Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease because of what we have studied, but for others they might be dull and awful.

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:43 pm

smccgrey wrote:
BillPackets wrote:
ilikebaseball wrote:for anyone that's done Cambridge's "most difficult passages" for RC, do you personally think that those passages are harder than the passages from 65 til now? I think it only covers the most difficult ones from 1-40 (they're still really hard, but just want a general consensus)

kinda hard 2 tell cuz i think sum of the most difficult passages r comparative reading which obvs r not covered in the 1-40 packets but overall idk they're prolly similar

I also think difficulty is relative. Sfogs might like the Kate Chopin passage, and I might like the one about Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease because of what we have studied, but for others they might be dull and awful.

thats pretty credited but i think sum might b valuable 4 u at this point for example i think the passage about blackmail (i know sum1 ITT can cite the PT its from without looking) is a really really great passage to practice (if u have done it and think/thought it was easy tell ol' bill to shut up) bc IMHO it shows how sum RC passages revolve around u picking up just one idea in the text bc like 3 of the 5 Qs from that passage all test the same idea

User avatar
ErgoSum
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ErgoSum » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:44 pm

BillPackets wrote:
smccgrey wrote:
BillPackets wrote:
ilikebaseball wrote:for anyone that's done Cambridge's "most difficult passages" for RC, do you personally think that those passages are harder than the passages from 65 til now? I think it only covers the most difficult ones from 1-40 (they're still really hard, but just want a general consensus)

kinda hard 2 tell cuz i think sum of the most difficult passages r comparative reading which obvs r not covered in the 1-40 packets but overall idk they're prolly similar

I also think difficulty is relative. Sfogs might like the Kate Chopin passage, and I might like the one about Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease because of what we have studied, but for others they might be dull and awful.

thats pretty credited but i think sum might b valuable 4 u at this point for example i think the passage about blackmail (i know sum1 ITT can cite the PT its from without looking) is a really really great passage to practice (if u have done it and think/thought it was easy tell ol' bill to shut up) bc IMHO it shows how sum RC passages revolve around u picking up just one idea in the text bc like 3 of the 5 Qs from that passage all test the same idea


PT 65?

User avatar
BillPackets
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:45 pm

ErgoSum wrote:
BillPackets wrote:thats pretty credited but i think sum might b valuable 4 u at this point for example i think the passage about blackmail (i know sum1 ITT can cite the PT its from without looking) is a really really great passage to practice (if u have done it and think/thought it was easy tell ol' bill to shut up) bc IMHO it shows how sum RC passages revolve around u picking up just one idea in the text bc like 3 of the 5 Qs from that passage all test the same idea


PT 65?

i thot it was 65 but didnt want to mis-cite at the risk of lookin like a dummy this close to test time but i think it is 65 too

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk
Posts: 2791
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Colonel_funkadunk » Wed Sep 24, 2014 4:46 pm

BillPackets wrote:
ErgoSum wrote:
BillPackets wrote:thats pretty credited but i think sum might b valuable 4 u at this point for example i think the passage about blackmail (i know sum1 ITT can cite the PT its from without looking) is a really really great passage to practice (if u have done it and think/thought it was easy tell ol' bill to shut up) bc IMHO it shows how sum RC passages revolve around u picking up just one idea in the text bc like 3 of the 5 Qs from that passage all test the same idea


PT 65?

i thot it was 65 but didnt want to mis-cite at the risk of lookin like a dummy this close to test time but i think it is 65 too


Yea its 65




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Instrumental, Pozzo, rk42, tflan19, theboringest and 13 guests