The Official September 2014 Study Group

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
User avatar
ErgoSum

Bronze
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ErgoSum » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:44 pm

hetookmetoamovie wrote:
schmelling wrote:only one PT left.

68 will be my bitch.


68 was a good 'un. You'll destroy it, schmells.

How did you guys determine the order...let me rephrase that... how did you guys come up with your PT schedules? Is there some method to it (i.e., am I total n00b for going in numerical order}?

http://www.shapeways.com/model/1127123/blank-72-side-dice-d72.html

heptacontakaidigon

User avatar
schmelling

Silver
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:15 am

Post removed.

Postby schmelling » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:48 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by schmelling on Sat Dec 05, 2015 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
sfoglia

Gold
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:30 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby sfoglia » Tue Sep 23, 2014 4:56 pm

hetookmetoamovie wrote:
schmelling wrote:only one PT left.

68 will be my bitch.


68 was a good 'un. You'll destroy it, schmells.

How did you guys determine the order...let me rephrase that... how did you guys come up with your PT schedules? Is there some method to it (i.e., am I total n00b for going in numerical order}?


68 was the best I ever had.

User avatar
hetookmetoamovie

Silver
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby hetookmetoamovie » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:01 pm

schmelling wrote:I went in order for the ones that testmasters gave us, except for the ones they proctored in a classroom setting, which I took according to their schedule. The exception being that as I got to have 2 weeks left I decided to start doing the most recent tests, just to be sure I saw all of the 70s before test day. Thanks for the words of encouragement.

Ahhh, makes sense!

ErgoSum wrote:heptacontakaidigon


:-D I'm buying one if Saturday goes well. Then I'm going to BURN IT.

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ilikebaseball » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:04 pm

Just printed off the most difficult RC's again. Gonna do half today and half tomorrow. I'm gonna figure this shit out. Friday is a day off, so I'm gonna fucking figure it out before then.

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ilikebaseball » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:05 pm

brb

User avatar
unodostres

Silver
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby unodostres » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:06 pm

here to post my fake scores

pt71
173

lg-1 (rule sub lol sure)
lr1: -2
lr2: -4
RC: -4 (0,1,1,2) i need to read mirrors when im baked.

fuuckin amazing curve. illtake that curveon sat
Last edited by unodostres on Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:07 pm

ilikebaseball wrote:Just printed off the most difficult RC's again. Gonna do half today and half tomorrow. I'm gonna figure this shit out. Friday is a day off, so I'm gonna fucking figure it out before then.

the simplest, dumbest, most obvious Q to ask on RC if you're down to 2 ACs or whatever: which answer is supported by the passage (and which does not have any support?) srs this Q has really saved me in some pickles n its really an easy Q

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ilikebaseball » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:07 pm

unodostres wrote:here to post my fake scores

pt71
173

lg-1 (rule sub lol sure)
lr1: -2
lr2: -4
RC: -4 (0,1,1,2) i need to read mirrors when im baked.


damn. I'd be thrilled with that RC score on 71

User avatar
ErgoSum

Bronze
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ErgoSum » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:11 pm

ilikebaseball wrote:
unodostres wrote:here to post my fake scores

pt71
173

lg-1 (rule sub lol sure)
lr1: -2
lr2: -4
RC: -4 (0,1,1,2) i need to read mirrors when im baked.


damn. I'd be thrilled with that RC score on 71

Me too! Good job!
I'm taking 71 on Thursday. Excited to destroy it

User avatar
hetookmetoamovie

Silver
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby hetookmetoamovie » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:12 pm

unodostres wrote:here to post my fake scores

pt71
173

lg-1 (rule sub lol sure)
lr1: -2
lr2: -4
RC: -4 (0,1,1,2) i need to read mirrors when im baked.

fuuckin amazing curve. illtake that curveon sat


Those were my numbers except LG and RC were flipped! idfk what went wrong for me. 4 mistakes spread across the 4 games.

User avatar
ErgoSum

Bronze
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ErgoSum » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:13 pm

ilikebaseball wrote:Just printed off the most difficult RC's again. Gonna do half today and half tomorrow. I'm gonna figure this shit out. Friday is a day off, so I'm gonna fucking figure it out before then.


Doing this tomorrow. Did you get the list of them off of a specific site that I'd be able to find Googling? I found a list, but I'm not sure how dated it is. Are you able to list which PT's they are from?

User avatar
unodostres

Silver
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby unodostres » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:13 pm

ilikebaseball wrote:
unodostres wrote:here to post my fake scores

pt71
173

lg-1 (rule sub lol sure)
lr1: -2
lr2: -4
RC: -4 (0,1,1,2) i need to read mirrors when im baked.


damn. I'd be thrilled with that RC score on 71


thought the first three were easy. pretty fun comparative passage. then agian, the esoteric aspect of that mirrors shit was a little werid but i kinda knew what they were saying and what was going on. still kinda bodes well that if youre in lalaand its k cuz thats what they want? just stay solid i guess.

User avatar
unodostres

Silver
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby unodostres » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:14 pm

hetookmetoamovie wrote:
unodostres wrote:here to post my fake scores

pt71
173

lg-1 (rule sub lol sure)
lr1: -2
lr2: -4
RC: -4 (0,1,1,2) i need to read mirrors when im baked.

fuuckin amazing curve. illtake that curveon sat


Those were my numbers except LG and RC were flipped! idfk what went wrong for me. 4 mistakes spread across the 4 games.


duuuuude/dudeettee. -1 in rc? with mirrors? ur a genius. id take your flip over mine. gg thou thats a great score.

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ilikebaseball » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:16 pm

ErgoSum wrote:
ilikebaseball wrote:Just printed off the most difficult RC's again. Gonna do half today and half tomorrow. I'm gonna figure this shit out. Friday is a day off, so I'm gonna fucking figure it out before then.


Doing this tomorrow. Did you get the list of them off of a specific site that I'd be able to find Googling? I found a list, but I'm not sure how dated it is. Are you able to list which PT's they are from?


the last page there is an index of PT's where they are from. Think there is about 21 in here.

User avatar
schmelling

Silver
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:15 am

Post removed.

Postby schmelling » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:20 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by schmelling on Sat Dec 05, 2015 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:23 pm

schmelling wrote:what's the new parallel question stem everyone has been talking about? I didn't notice anything...

its like "using the reasoning above, we could also conclude that..."
insert parallel reasoning answers here

User avatar
ErgoSum

Bronze
Posts: 427
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:35 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ErgoSum » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:24 pm

schmelling wrote:what's the new parallel question stem everyone has been talking about? I didn't notice anything...


Instead of saying something like "which of the following most closely parallels" it is like "what must be true according to similar style reasoning" or something

idk. maybe I made it up

User avatar
schmelling

Silver
Posts: 1090
Joined: Wed Jul 09, 2014 12:15 am

Post removed.

Postby schmelling » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:25 pm

Post removed.
Last edited by schmelling on Sat Dec 05, 2015 1:53 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
hetookmetoamovie

Silver
Posts: 620
Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:03 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby hetookmetoamovie » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:30 pm

unodostres wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:
unodostres wrote:here to post my fake scores

pt71
173

lg-1 (rule sub lol sure)
lr1: -2
lr2: -4
RC: -4 (0,1,1,2) i need to read mirrors when im baked.

fuuckin amazing curve. illtake that curveon sat


Those were my numbers except LG and RC were flipped! idfk what went wrong for me. 4 mistakes spread across the 4 games.


duuuuude/dudeettee. -1 in rc? with mirrors? ur a genius. id take your flip over mine. gg thou thats a great score.


Haha, gracias! Nice score yourself :) I missed a stupid q in the online gaming virtual property passage! My RC is pretty solid, but my LR can be kind of erratic. Gotta lock down the LG and pray that we get a fat curve on Saturday...

User avatar
BillPackets

Gold
Posts: 2176
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 5:56 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby BillPackets » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:34 pm

hetookmetoamovie wrote:a fat curve on Saturday...

sup w fat curves and that bein my new fav phrase

User avatar
unodostres

Silver
Posts: 551
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 1:01 pm

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby unodostres » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:36 pm

hetookmetoamovie wrote:
unodostres wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:
unodostres wrote:here to post my fake scores

pt71
173

lg-1 (rule sub lol sure)
lr1: -2
lr2: -4
RC: -4 (0,1,1,2) i need to read mirrors when im baked.

fuuckin amazing curve. illtake that curveon sat


Those were my numbers except LG and RC were flipped! idfk what went wrong for me. 4 mistakes spread across the 4 games.


duuuuude/dudeettee. -1 in rc? with mirrors? ur a genius. id take your flip over mine. gg thou thats a great score.


Haha, gracias! Nice score yourself :) I missed a stupid q in the online gaming virtual property passage! My RC is pretty solid, but my LR can be kind of erratic. Gotta lock down the LG and pray that we get a fat curve on Saturday...


de nada : ) same to you too!

lol fat is what im sayin

imagine a june 07 curve. -7 170 lol shiiittt

Hand

Gold
Posts: 3843
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby Hand » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:42 pm

hetookmetoamovie wrote:
unodostres wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:
unodostres wrote: (rule sub lol sure)

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ilikebaseball » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:45 pm

JW though, everyone has been saying that the patterns indicate that this test is going to be very generous. Is the pattern not pretty erratic? The people I've spoken too are fairly confident in a 13 or 14 curve because "most September tests are like that, less people are taking it, and June's was very generous and usually September's is the same, if not moreso."

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Postby ilikebaseball » Tue Sep 23, 2014 5:47 pm

BillPackets wrote:
ilikebaseball wrote:Just printed off the most difficult RC's again. Gonna do half today and half tomorrow. I'm gonna figure this shit out. Friday is a day off, so I'm gonna fucking figure it out before then.

the simplest, dumbest, most obvious Q to ask on RC if you're down to 2 ACs or whatever: which answer is supported by the passage (and which does not have any support?) srs this Q has really saved me in some pickles n its really an easy Q


love advice like this. keep them coming guys.... people say that "usually the strong answer is incorrect also." I know for sure to not rely on these types of things, but when all else fails, right?



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests