Page 414 of 508

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:26 am
by Colonel_funkadunk
hereisonehand wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:colonel did you enjoy the mirrors passage?


if we are being honest, I like dense passages more than others bc I hate inference questions in rc. I thought the first question in it was annoying but the rest werent tooo terrible. It was the innate ability one that I made the dumber mistakes on. But overall I felt good about the section bc rc is usually my worst of the 4


I stared at that first question for a good while but ended up w/ some right answer circling, still missed two questions on it though (don't remember which ones), which is a lot for me OH SORRY QUIGZ I MEAN THAT'S ACTUALLY BETTER THAN NORMAL

yeah RC has become my worst section, instead of LG, because #drilling #mostlearnablesection


Speaking of question 1, it really seemed like the passage is saying that it's actual mechanisms are still up for debate am I inferring too much? It
Also seemed like the right answer is based on a very narrow part of the passage

Edit: SORRY FOR SPECIFIC Q DISCUSSION

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:26 am
by Colonel_funkadunk
PeanutsNJam wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
PeanutsNJam wrote:who's quiggers


Someone who told me to grease it.

Explain this statement PNJ


It's possible he's referring to a specific stage in coitus commonly practiced by more progressive members of the Homo Sapien species. Generally, intercourse between two individuals involve insertion of the male's genitalia into the female's respective counterpart. However, some individuals prefer to instead involve the rectum due to its contracted and taut nature. This latter activity almost universally requires the use of a lubricant, which is perhaps what quiggers is referring to when he mentioned "grease".

THANKS PNJ FOR EXPLAININ

Post removed.

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:27 am
by schmelling
Post removed.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:31 am
by sfoglia
ilikebaseball wrote:btw, real talk, can someone just walk me their thought process on necc/suff. Whenever a problem comes up, I immediately read the stem and write SA or NA next to it. But for the typical problem, what is your process step by step? Like, as far as how you eliminate, how you attack, when you negate, etc.


You said you haven't used study books, right? The Trainer has this great section where Kim describes the kinds of wrong answers you'll see with NA questions, IIRC. There's always going to be one or two questions that are out of scope, usually one that misinterprets the stimulus' argument and one that does the complete opposite, etc.

Anyone remember this?

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:32 am
by accessislife
UGH work this week -_-

So with both assumption questions I find it helpful to figure out what the conclusion is - I know it sounds trivial but I had trouble with this for a while- and then after that for suff assumption I almost look at it as an MSS flipped and reversed - like most strongly supports the conclusion instead of supported by the stimulus

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:32 am
by Hand
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hereisonehand wrote:colonel did you enjoy the mirrors passage?


if we are being honest, I like dense passages more than others bc I hate inference questions in rc. I thought the first question in it was annoying but the rest werent tooo terrible. It was the innate ability one that I made the dumber mistakes on. But overall I felt good about the section bc rc is usually my worst of the 4


I stared at that first question for a good while but ended up w/ some right answer circling, still missed two questions on it though (don't remember which ones), which is a lot for me OH SORRY QUIGZ I MEAN THAT'S ACTUALLY BETTER THAN NORMAL

yeah RC has become my worst section, instead of LG, because #drilling #mostlearnablesection


Speaking of question 1, it really seemed like the passage is saying that it's actual mechanisms are still up for debate am I inferring too much? It
Also seemed like the right answer is based on a very narrow part of the passage

Edit: SORRY FOR SPECIFIC Q DISCUSSION


I don't have it in front of me but I remember thinking that while it would be reasonable to conclude from the passage that what the proper theory is, is still up for debate, but it doesn't actually come out and say that, whereas it does explicitly state that the correct theory needs to incorporate both elements. But it's weird to present that as the main point of the passage - it is only thrown in there at the end. Shitty question. SORRY DECEMBER THREAD WE ARE DISCUSSING A QUESTION

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:39 am
by Colonel_funkadunk
Thanks hand that actually makes a lot of sense

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:39 am
by Hand
ITT we sometimes stay on topic

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:41 am
by Colonel_funkadunk
hereisonehand wrote:ITT we sometimes stay on topic


And that's sometimes depressing

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:43 am
by hetookmetoamovie
It's fall, guys. (Not that we have seasons in California.)

ETA: Not on topic for long!

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:46 am
by Colonel_funkadunk
hetookmetoamovie wrote:It's fall, guys. (Not that we have seasons in California.)

ETA: Not on topic for long!



This means I have about two weeks of nice weather pre blizzard

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:48 am
by hetookmetoamovie
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:It's fall, guys. (Not that we have seasons in California.)

ETA: Not on topic for long!



This means I have about two weeks of nice weather pre blizzard


I'll be sunbathing while the earth opens up and swallows the state whole.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:49 am
by Hand
hetookmetoamovie wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:It's fall, guys. (Not that we have seasons in California.)

ETA: Not on topic for long!



This means I have about two weeks of nice weather pre blizzard


I'll be sunbathing while the earth opens up and swallows the state whole.


Yeah this. Well it'll probably rain a couple times at some point. But probably not 'till winter. ETA: if we make it that long!

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:52 am
by ilikebaseball
definitely gonna refer back to this page later on this afternoon. GOTTA GET A LIFT IN NOW HURRRDURRRRR

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:53 am
by Colonel_funkadunk
hereisonehand wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
hetookmetoamovie wrote:It's fall, guys. (Not that we have seasons in California.)

ETA: Not on topic for long!



This means I have about two weeks of nice weather pre blizzard


I'll be sunbathing while the earth opens up and swallows the state whole.


Yeah this. Well it'll probably rain a couple times at some point. But probably not 'till winter. ETA: if we make it that long!


Me before I get my lsat score

Image

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:56 am
by Hand
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
Me before I get my lsat score

Image


Colonel your gifs are totally on point as of late

Here's me anticipating my score

Image

ETA

JK it'll be more like this

Image

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 11:59 am
by hetookmetoamovie
<3 Colonel <3 hand

me

Image

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:01 pm
by hetookmetoamovie
the irony in your gif, Hand, is that you're still friggin' McDreamy.

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:04 pm
by BillPackets
bill

Image

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:08 pm
by hetookmetoamovie
Ok, off to finally take PT71

looking forward to the RC and seeing how the Timberlake hypothesis holds up

Image

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:13 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
ITT: gif game proper

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:15 pm
by BillPackets
hetookmetoamovie wrote:Image


hereisonehand wrote:Image


these two were just really on point

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:26 pm
by PeanutsNJam
every time I see you guys use ETA I think estimated time to arrival

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:29 pm
by Colonel_funkadunk
PeanutsNJam wrote:every time I see you guys use ETA I think estimated time to arrival


Same until I googled it

Re: The Official September 2014 Study Group

Posted: Tue Sep 23, 2014 12:42 pm
by PeanutsNJam
Colonel_funkadunk wrote:
PeanutsNJam wrote:every time I see you guys use ETA I think estimated time to arrival


Same until I googled it


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ETA doesn't help