schmelling wrote:ilikebaseball wrote:btw, real talk, can someone just walk me their thought process on necc/suff. Whenever a problem comes up, I immediately read the stem and write SA or NA next to it. But for the typical problem, what is your process step by step? Like, as far as how you eliminate, how you attack, when you negate, etc.
DO NOT negate on sufficient questions, it may work sometimes, but this only by chance that the sufficient assumption is also necessary. I negate on necessary assumption questions after I've knocked out 2 or 3 wrong answers.
yeah this got buried sry baseball i approach them roughly the same way look for the gap/term shift and then look for an answer that connects them the ACs are obvs diff and SAs can get a little more mechanical but yeah my approach is pretty similar