The Official September 2014 Study Group Forum

[thequigley]

Bill i like to make you think i dont care.

the psychology of quiggers is a weird 1 idk y u would want to make me think u dont care

inb4 u say something like 'well Bill obviously you care that I wasn't responding'

Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?

[Colonel_funkadunk]

Bill i like to make you think i dont care.

the psychology of quiggers is a weird 1 idk y u would want to make me think u dont care

inb4 u say something like 'well Bill obviously you care that I wasn't responding'

Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?

Sup quigz

[Hand]

anybody got some fake scores to report now that the quigz is here?

[BillPackets]

Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?

You, sir, are an idiot!

[thequigley]

Bill i like to make you think i dont care.

the psychology of quiggers is a weird 1 idk y u would want to make me think u dont care

inb4 u say something like 'well Bill obviously you care that I wasn't responding'

Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?

Sup quigz

Keeping it real, colonel. you? ready to crush?

[hetookmetoamovie]

anybody got some fake scores to report now that the quigz is here?

[ErgoSum]

Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

[hetookmetoamovie]

Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

180
(more apropos than usual)

[BillPackets]

Almost done finishing drilling all LR by type. I am doing a lot better than I was when I started out. I'm anticipating May 10th to see if my hard work will actually result in a better score.

quigz real talk r u manilla bay

[thequigley]

Almost done finishing drilling all LR by type. I am doing a lot better than I was when I started out. I'm anticipating May 10th to see if my hard work will actually result in a better score.

quigz real talk r u manilla bay

are you black tom brady?

[Hand]

Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

not bad should be a 179 shoe-in for you Ergo, but how did you miss 2 on LG? don't you know its the #mostlearnablesection? should've done a lil more drillin for that 180

[BillPackets]

Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

way2goergo

[ErgoSum]

Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

not bad should be a 179 shoe-in for you Ergo, but how did you miss 2 on LG? don't you know its the #mostlearnablesection? should've done a lil more drillin for that 180

The thing is I ended up getting two more correct than was allowed, so somehow there is a point where you learn a section so much it becomes a detriment

[Hand]

Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

not bad should be a 179 shoe-in for you Ergo, but how did you miss 2 on LG? don't you know its the #mostlearnablesection? should've done a lil more drillin for that 180

The thing is I ended up getting two more correct than was allowed, so somehow there is a point where you learn a section so much it becomes a detriment

damn you overdrilled that MF
hope you can undo some of that damage before saturday

[Colonel_funkadunk]

Bill i like to make you think i dont care.

the psychology of quiggers is a weird 1 idk y u would want to make me think u dont care

inb4 u say something like 'well Bill obviously you care that I wasn't responding'

Bill. Let me tell ya, old friend. We will crush this test. OTHERWISE YOU DONT WANT IT BAD ENOUGH...YOU JUS KINDA WANT IT. WHEN YOU WANT A SCORE MORE THAN YOU WANNA BREATHE, THATS WHEN YOULL BE SUCCESSFUL.

the flawed logic in this is most similar to?

Keeping it real, colonel. you? ready to crush?

ALWAYS READY 2 SMASH

[Colonel_funkadunk]

Took PT73 today.

RC: -0
LG: - (-2)
LR1: -0
LR2: -1
LR3: -1

Don't know which was the experimental, but I'm pretty happy with my score. I think I'll be ok for Saturday if I am floating around this score +/-5

You are very necessary ITT

[ErgoSum]

You are very necessary ITT

[ilikebaseball]

for anyone that's done Cambridge's "most difficult passages" for RC, do you personally think that those passages are harder than the passages from 65 til now? I think it only covers the most difficult ones from 1-40 (they're still really hard, but just want a general consensus)

[BillPackets]

for anyone that's done Cambridge's "most difficult passages" for RC, do you personally think that those passages are harder than the passages from 65 til now? I think it only covers the most difficult ones from 1-40 (they're still really hard, but just want a general consensus)

kinda hard 2 tell cuz i think sum of the most difficult passages r comparative reading which obvs r not covered in the 1-40 packets but overall idk they're prolly similar

[Gray]

.

[BillPackets]

for anyone that's done Cambridge's "most difficult passages" for RC, do you personally think that those passages are harder than the passages from 65 til now? I think it only covers the most difficult ones from 1-40 (they're still really hard, but just want a general consensus)

kinda hard 2 tell cuz i think sum of the most difficult passages r comparative reading which obvs r not covered in the 1-40 packets but overall idk they're prolly similar

I also think difficulty is relative. Sfogs might like the Kate Chopin passage, and I might like the one about Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease because of what we have studied, but for others they might be dull and awful.

thats pretty credited but i think sum might b valuable 4 u at this point for example i think the passage about blackmail (i know sum1 ITT can cite the PT its from without looking) is a really really great passage to practice (if u have done it and think/thought it was easy tell ol' bill to shut up) bc IMHO it shows how sum RC passages revolve around u picking up just one idea in the text bc like 3 of the 5 Qs from that passage all test the same idea

[ErgoSum]

for anyone that's done Cambridge's "most difficult passages" for RC, do you personally think that those passages are harder than the passages from 65 til now? I think it only covers the most difficult ones from 1-40 (they're still really hard, but just want a general consensus)

kinda hard 2 tell cuz i think sum of the most difficult passages r comparative reading which obvs r not covered in the 1-40 packets but overall idk they're prolly similar

I also think difficulty is relative. Sfogs might like the Kate Chopin passage, and I might like the one about Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease because of what we have studied, but for others they might be dull and awful.

thats pretty credited but i think sum might b valuable 4 u at this point for example i think the passage about blackmail (i know sum1 ITT can cite the PT its from without looking) is a really really great passage to practice (if u have done it and think/thought it was easy tell ol' bill to shut up) bc IMHO it shows how sum RC passages revolve around u picking up just one idea in the text bc like 3 of the 5 Qs from that passage all test the same idea

PT 65?

[BillPackets]

thats pretty credited but i think sum might b valuable 4 u at this point for example i think the passage about blackmail (i know sum1 ITT can cite the PT its from without looking) is a really really great passage to practice (if u have done it and think/thought it was easy tell ol' bill to shut up) bc IMHO it shows how sum RC passages revolve around u picking up just one idea in the text bc like 3 of the 5 Qs from that passage all test the same idea

PT 65?

i thot it was 65 but didnt want to mis-cite at the risk of lookin like a dummy this close to test time but i think it is 65 too

[Colonel_funkadunk]

thats pretty credited but i think sum might b valuable 4 u at this point for example i think the passage about blackmail (i know sum1 ITT can cite the PT its from without looking) is a really really great passage to practice (if u have done it and think/thought it was easy tell ol' bill to shut up) bc IMHO it shows how sum RC passages revolve around u picking up just one idea in the text bc like 3 of the 5 Qs from that passage all test the same idea

PT 65?

i thot it was 65 but didnt want to mis-cite at the risk of lookin like a dummy this close to test time but i think it is 65 too

Yea its 65

[BillPackets]

thats pretty credited but i think sum might b valuable 4 u at this point for example i think the passage about blackmail (i know sum1 ITT can cite the PT its from without looking) is a really really great passage to practice (if u have done it and think/thought it was easy tell ol' bill to shut up) bc IMHO it shows how sum RC passages revolve around u picking up just one idea in the text bc like 3 of the 5 Qs from that passage all test the same idea

PT 65?

i thot it was 65 but didnt want to mis-cite at the risk of lookin like a dummy this close to test time but i think it is 65 too

Yea its 65

ok every1 its confirmed blackmail passage is from 65