The Official September 2014 Study Group Forum

[dasani13]

So depressing when everyone is hitting personal bests and I just hit my worst PT in the last two weeks. Stupid bumblebees and urban sprawl and australian lawyers!

that PT sucked!

[P.J.Fry]

So depressing when everyone is hitting personal bests and I just hit my worst PT in the last two weeks. Stupid bumblebees and urban sprawl and australian lawyers!

Ya you're not alone Fry. I'm pretty sure that RC gored everyone itt

Yea so I've read. I also went -6 on a pretty easy games section which I'm actually much more unhappy about. It just felt like a better complaint than magazine interns in Tuscany.

Just not thinking clearly enough today.

[Gray]

.

[Gray]

.

[BJS]

Got to PT23 S3 Q10 in my Cambridge LR Difficulty packet today. It's the nonmoving cars one that I've read about so often on here, so I knew what the answer was. But sitting there I just couldn't justify B (the nonmoving running vehiciles answer) to myself. Any help? I selected E after eliminated all except for B, which I would have eliminated without knowing it was the answer.

ETA: Nevermind, found a good answer through the search function. Definitely makes sense, but I wouldn't have made the logical connection during a real test.

[Colonel_funkadunk]

WTF the one night I go out for dinner and everyone PWs. JFC.

I had a feeling you might react this way

[Gray]

.

[Colonel_funkadunk]

WTF the one night I go out for dinner and everyone PWs. JFC.

I had a feeling you might react this way

Obviously. So apparently you have big guns and an adorable child. Now I know what it's like to not see my eyebrows.

Pg 183, you have 5 min. This is only bc I've seen your brows

[mornincounselor]

Post removed.

[Colonel_funkadunk]

Got to PT23 S3 Q10 in my Cambridge LR Difficulty packet today. It's the nonmoving cars one that I've read about so often on here, so I knew what the answer was. But sitting there I just couldn't justify B (the nonmoving running vehiciles answer) to myself. Any help? I selected E after eliminated all except for B, which I would have eliminated without knowing it was the answer.

ETA: Nevermind, found a good answer through the search function. Definitely makes sense, but I wouldn't have made the logical connection during a real test.

Sure, so it's a strengthen question. The prompt tells us that if a person decides to walk instead of driving there is "one less vehicle emitting pollution." It concludes that if people were to walk whenever it was feasible for them to do so then "pollution [would] be greatly reduced."

Sometimes with LR I like to start reading choices from the bottom.

(E) This weakens the argument.

(D) Who Cares? This is irrelevant to the conclusion.

(C ) Okay? This certainly doesn't strengthen the argument.

(B) Hmmm. So cars in gridlock produce less emissions than cars free to move quickly done the highway (that makes sense) but the more cars there are on the road the greater the congestion there is. So the more cars on the road the more pollution caused. This falls in nicely to our argument. For if many of those people walked instead of drove ---> less cars on the road --> less congestion ---> less pollution.

This strengthens the argument.

(A) this weakens the argument.

Is it in the strengthen packet

[Gray]

.

[Colonel_funkadunk]

Pg 183, you have 5 min. This is only bc I've seen your brows

AWWW. Lived up to the hype.

THANK GOD

[ilikebaseball]

PT 54
RC-2
LR-0
LG-1
LR-5

172. Fuck the 2nd LR

[Colonel_funkadunk]

PT 54
RC-2
LR-0
LG-1
LR-5

172. Fuck the 2nd LR

Good job. Damn tho you were killin it Til that last section. Fatigue you think or just a tricky section?

[BillPackets]

WTF the one night I go out for dinner and everyone PWs. JFC.

At least u got 2 see the colonel

[dasani13]

PT 54
RC-2
LR-0
LG-1
LR-5

172. Fuck the 2nd LR

Nice!

[hetookmetoamovie]

WTF the one night I go out for dinner and everyone PWs. JFC.

At least u got 2 see the colonel

"Going to see the colonel" sounds like a euphemism for something naughty. I'm probably just thinking of the old Christopher Walken skit on SNL. #old

[hetookmetoamovie]

PT 54
RC-2
LR-0
LG-1
LR-5

172. Fuck the 2nd LR

Awesome!

[Colonel_funkadunk]

WTF the one night I go out for dinner and everyone PWs. JFC.

At least u got 2 see the colonel

"Going to see the colonel" sounds like a euphemism for something naughty. I'm probably just thinking of the old Christopher Walken skit on SNL. #old

I'm glad my handle has a seductive connotation #TLSAFTERHOURS

[ilikebaseball]

PT 54
RC-2
LR-0
LG-1
LR-5

172. Fuck the 2nd LR

Good job. Damn tho you were killin it Til that last section. Fatigue you think or just a tricky section?

no idea. it always seems like there is one LR section 2x harder than the other to me

[boris09]

no idea. it always seems like there is one LR section 2x harder than the other to me

+1

[sfoglia]

no idea. it always seems like there is one LR section 2x harder than the other to me

+1

I thought that was certifiably a thing.

Congrats on the score, ILB!!

[BillPackets]

Tonight was a good night ITT guys let's keep it up

[ilikebaseball]

Thanks guys. I'm gonna do a couple Mcgraw Hill tests just for more difficulty before returning to regular PT's 62-72 for the final 17-20 days

[BillPackets]

bill's amazing clean form,

Thinking about this will Never get old

Haaaaaa I thot no 1 else saw that besides grey but I mean that vid is funny af