LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT

dreamofNYC
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:25 pm

LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT

Postby dreamofNYC » Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:35 pm

Anyone?

I am hoping LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC

User avatar
jcccc
Posts: 181
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:42 pm

Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT

Postby jcccc » Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:36 pm

People are saying the 2nd one.
I hope so

Hoping4Happiness
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 8:19 am

Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT

Postby Hoping4Happiness » Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:40 pm

well if its of any importance i know the first LR was 25, and the next two were 26.... so I'm guessing the experimental one was the one that had the 2 instances where there were 1 stimulus for 2 questions.... once i noticed that i assumed it was the experimental and i know this is frowned upon but I just went through it at a relaxed speed... and was out of time by question 20 so ya if it turns out thats NOT the experimental l need to cancel.... lol

dreamofNYC
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:25 pm

Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT

Postby dreamofNYC » Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:46 pm

Hoping4Happiness wrote:well if its of any importance i know the first LR was 25, and the next two were 26.... so I'm guessing the experimental one was the one that had the 2 instances where there were 1 stimulus for 2 questions.... once i noticed that i assumed it was the experimental and i know this is frowned upon but I just went through it at a relaxed speed... and was out of time by question 20 so ya if it turns out thats NOT the experimental l need to cancel.... lol


Interesting, I didn't even think of that. Indeed, the first LR had 25 Q whereas LR2 the presumably experimental one had 26. I would expect one section of 25Q and the other of 26Q vs. both 26Q. :) Fingers crossed!

AJB
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Nov 27, 2013 2:44 pm

Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT

Postby AJB » Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:56 pm

I thought it was 25-25-26? Not 25-26-26

dreamofNYC
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:25 pm

Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT

Postby dreamofNYC » Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:58 pm

AJB wrote:I thought it was 25-25-26? Not 25-26-26


Hmm you may be right.

dreamofNYC
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:25 pm

LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC!! has been confirmed for Dec 2013!!

Postby dreamofNYC » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:24 pm

LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC!! has been confirmed for Dec 2013!!

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse
Posts: 22808
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: LR-LG-LR(exp)-LR-RC OR LR(exp)-LG-LR-LR-RC? forDec 2013 LSAT

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:33 pm

People, there is extensive discussion of this in the waiters' thread, we don't need a bunch of individual posts rehashing it.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=220914




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 4 guests