LR1 and 2 will have the same order. The exp can be anywhere though.Kevinlomax wrote:dazedandconfused13 wrote:Is the order consistent? Couldn't someone get the same tests LR1 and LR2, but in reverse order?dreamofNYC wrote:bee wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.
this.
Post removed. Forum
- Hotguy
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:33 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:47 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
Wow! I had 3 LRs. But none of them had a 2-question stimulus. That one has to be experimental. Weird that there can be > 1 experimental LRs on the same test.dosto wrote:Pretty sure the two-question stimuli in LR2 exp were a dead giveaway, but I wasn't putting anything past LSAC so I stayed on it (kind of wish this had been a real section).dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.
- Hotguy
- Posts: 382
- Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:33 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
Lol not safe to say at all but I can see where you're coming from..Glaucon wrote:December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:04 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
Well, I guess LSAC was bored and came up with at least four different LR sections.[/quote]dosto wrote:
i had three LR sections and did not have a 2 question stimuli...
HAHA im sure my brain is just fried... or i skipped that question accidentally....
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:47 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
But I know my LR3 was real. Just trying to figure out whether LR1 or LR2 was real.Kevinlomax wrote:LR1 and 2 will have the same order. The exp can be anywhere though.dazedandconfused13 wrote:dreamofNYC wrote:Is the order consistent? Couldn't someone get the same tests LR1 and LR2, but in reverse order?bee wrote:
this.
Last edited by dazedandconfused13 on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:04 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
dazedandconfused13 wrote:Wow! I had 3 LRs. But none of them had a 2-question stimulus. That one has to be experimental. Weird that there can be > 1 experimental LRs on the same test.dosto wrote:Pretty sure the two-question stimuli in LR2 exp were a dead giveaway, but I wasn't putting anything past LSAC so I stayed on it (kind of wish this had been a real section).dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.
exactly
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
.
Last edited by dosto on Fri Sep 04, 2015 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:04 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
Can you have 3 LR sections all in different orders?
For example could my experimental be LR2 and in other tests it was LR1?
For example could my experimental be LR2 and in other tests it was LR1?
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:25 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
Kevinlomax wrote:dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.
besides sheepherders, what other questions were lr1...space and population growth?
Last edited by dreamofNYC on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
.
Last edited by dosto on Fri Sep 04, 2015 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:04 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
I cant do this anymore. Time to drink and watch some good football. I still have adrenaline going since about last night. Good luck everyone thanks for the help
-
- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:25 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
Me too. G'nite all and thanks for the advice and solidarity!Kevinlomax wrote:I cant do this anymore. Time to drink and watch some good football. I still have adrenaline going since about last night. Good luck everyone thanks for the help
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 4:34 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
Only had 1 games but only remember 1 rule sub question ughh I hope I didn't miss it
Last edited by jttoplawschools93 on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
I challenge you to find me a Dec PT that had a smaller curve than the preceding October curve.Hotguy wrote:Lol not safe to say at all but I can see where you're coming from..Glaucon wrote:December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.
Last edited by Glaucon on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:42 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
good callKevinlomax wrote:I cant do this anymore. Time to drink and watch some good football. I still have adrenaline going since about last night. Good luck everyone thanks for the help
-
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:47 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
.
Last edited by NYC2012 on Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- KingJamesLBJ
- Posts: 194
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:22 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
Was that question at the end?dosto wrote:Pretty sure the two-question stimuli in LR2 exp were a dead giveaway, but I wasn't putting anything past LSAC so I stayed on it (kind of wish this had been a real section).dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 8:19 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
WAIT so is it confirmed that the 2 question stimulus LR is the experimental? Man that last RC passage was killerdazedandconfused13 wrote:Wow! I had 3 LRs. But none of them had a 2-question stimulus. That one has to be experimental. Weird that there can be > 1 experimental LRs on the same test.dosto wrote:Pretty sure the two-question stimuli in LR2 exp were a dead giveaway, but I wasn't putting anything past LSAC so I stayed on it (kind of wish this had been a real section).dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:47 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
I don't think anyone is challenging the past trend, just wondering if that will apply again. I am rooting for you though!Glaucon wrote:I challenge you to find me a Dec PT that had a smaller curve than the preceding October curve.Hotguy wrote:Lol not safe to say at all but I can see where you're coming from..Glaucon wrote:December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
But the fact that it never happened implies a policy preference that one would have to positively show there's reason for the LSAT makers to abandon. It's extremely unlikely to happen now.NYC2012 wrote:Just because it never happened doesn't mean it never will... use that LSAT logic!Glaucon wrote:I challenge you to find me a Dec PT that had a smaller curve than its preceding October curve.Hotguy wrote:Lol not safe to say at all but I can see where you're coming from..Glaucon wrote:December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.
Last edited by Glaucon on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 488
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1957
- Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:16 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
Just poured third glass of rye. The rest of you gaise are doing this wrong.
Also, meticulous curve speculation is a flame b/c most people keep referring to harder than average sections but the curve is set by the difficulty of individual questions not sections. I can think of a dozen questions that I imagine a majority of people got wrong (and 40+ questions no one probably got wrong).
Also, meticulous curve speculation is a flame b/c most people keep referring to harder than average sections but the curve is set by the difficulty of individual questions not sections. I can think of a dozen questions that I imagine a majority of people got wrong (and 40+ questions no one probably got wrong).
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am
Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread
.
Last edited by dosto on Fri Sep 04, 2015 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login