Post removed.

User avatar
Hotguy
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:33 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Hotguy » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:28 pm

Kevinlomax wrote:
dazedandconfused13 wrote:
dreamofNYC wrote:
bee wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.


Is the order consistent? Couldn't someone get the same tests LR1 and LR2, but in reverse order?



this.

LR1 and 2 will have the same order. The exp can be anywhere though.

Glaucon
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Glaucon » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:29 pm

December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.

dazedandconfused13
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby dazedandconfused13 » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:29 pm

dosto wrote:
dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.


Pretty sure the two-question stimuli in LR2 exp were a dead giveaway, but I wasn't putting anything past LSAC so I stayed on it (kind of wish this had been a real section).


Wow! I had 3 LRs. But none of them had a 2-question stimulus. That one has to be experimental. Weird that there can be > 1 experimental LRs on the same test.

User avatar
Hotguy
Posts: 382
Joined: Mon Sep 16, 2013 12:33 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Hotguy » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:30 pm

Glaucon wrote:December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.

Lol not safe to say at all but I can see where you're coming from..

Kevinlomax
Posts: 330
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:04 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Kevinlomax » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:31 pm

dosto wrote:
i had three LR sections and did not have a 2 question stimuli...


Well, I guess LSAC was bored and came up with at least four different LR sections.[/quote]

HAHA im sure my brain is just fried... or i skipped that question accidentally....

dazedandconfused13
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby dazedandconfused13 » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:31 pm

Kevinlomax wrote:
dazedandconfused13 wrote:
dreamofNYC wrote:
bee wrote:


Is the order consistent? Couldn't someone get the same tests LR1 and LR2, but in reverse order?



this.

LR1 and 2 will have the same order. The exp can be anywhere though.


But I know my LR3 was real. Just trying to figure out whether LR1 or LR2 was real.
Last edited by dazedandconfused13 on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Kevinlomax
Posts: 330
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:04 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Kevinlomax » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:32 pm

dazedandconfused13 wrote:
dosto wrote:
dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.


Pretty sure the two-question stimuli in LR2 exp were a dead giveaway, but I wasn't putting anything past LSAC so I stayed on it (kind of wish this had been a real section).


Wow! I had 3 LRs. But none of them had a 2-question stimulus. That one has to be experimental. Weird that there can be > 1 experimental LRs on the same test.



exactly

dosto
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby dosto » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:32 pm

.
Last edited by dosto on Fri Sep 04, 2015 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

Kevinlomax
Posts: 330
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:04 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Kevinlomax » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:33 pm

Can you have 3 LR sections all in different orders?

For example could my experimental be LR2 and in other tests it was LR1?

dreamofNYC
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:25 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby dreamofNYC » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:33 pm

Kevinlomax wrote:
dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.



besides sheepherders, what other questions were lr1...space and population growth?
Last edited by dreamofNYC on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dosto
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby dosto » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:34 pm

.
Last edited by dosto on Fri Sep 04, 2015 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

Kevinlomax
Posts: 330
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:04 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Kevinlomax » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:36 pm

I cant do this anymore. Time to drink and watch some good football. I still have adrenaline going since about last night. Good luck everyone thanks for the help

dreamofNYC
Posts: 193
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 10:25 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby dreamofNYC » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:39 pm

Kevinlomax wrote:I cant do this anymore. Time to drink and watch some good football. I still have adrenaline going since about last night. Good luck everyone thanks for the help


Me too. G'nite all and thanks for the advice and solidarity!

jttoplawschools93
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 4:34 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby jttoplawschools93 » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:40 pm

Only had 1 games but only remember 1 rule sub question ughh I hope I didn't miss it
Last edited by jttoplawschools93 on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Glaucon
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Glaucon » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:41 pm

Hotguy wrote:
Glaucon wrote:December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.

Lol not safe to say at all but I can see where you're coming from..


I challenge you to find me a Dec PT that had a smaller curve than the preceding October curve.
Last edited by Glaucon on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.

WonderCrunch
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 8:42 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby WonderCrunch » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:42 pm

Kevinlomax wrote:I cant do this anymore. Time to drink and watch some good football. I still have adrenaline going since about last night. Good luck everyone thanks for the help


good call

User avatar
NYC2012
Posts: 223
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:47 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby NYC2012 » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:44 pm

Glaucon wrote:
Hotguy wrote:
Glaucon wrote:December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.

Lol not safe to say at all but I can see where you're coming from..


I challenge you to find me a Dec PT that had a smaller curve than its preceding October curve.


Just because it never happened doesn't mean it never will... use that LSAT logic! :lol:

User avatar
KingJamesLBJ
Posts: 194
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:22 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby KingJamesLBJ » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:44 pm

dosto wrote:
dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.


Pretty sure the two-question stimuli in LR2 exp were a dead giveaway, but I wasn't putting anything past LSAC so I stayed on it (kind of wish this had been a real section).


Was that question at the end?

Hoping4Happiness
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri May 03, 2013 8:19 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Hoping4Happiness » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:45 pm

dazedandconfused13 wrote:
dosto wrote:
dreamofNYC wrote:
OK, THANK YOU. so for those who had 3LRs, the real one was the 1st of the two. So this is correct: LR(real)-LG-LR(exp)-LR(real)-RC.


Pretty sure the two-question stimuli in LR2 exp were a dead giveaway, but I wasn't putting anything past LSAC so I stayed on it (kind of wish this had been a real section).


Wow! I had 3 LRs. But none of them had a 2-question stimulus. That one has to be experimental. Weird that there can be > 1 experimental LRs on the same test.


WAIT so is it confirmed that the 2 question stimulus LR is the experimental? Man that last RC passage was killer :o

dazedandconfused13
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 6:47 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby dazedandconfused13 » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:45 pm

Glaucon wrote:
Hotguy wrote:
Glaucon wrote:December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.

Lol not safe to say at all but I can see where you're coming from..


I challenge you to find me a Dec PT that had a smaller curve than the preceding October curve.


I don't think anyone is challenging the past trend, just wondering if that will apply again. I am rooting for you though! :wink:

Glaucon
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby Glaucon » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:46 pm

NYC2012 wrote:
Glaucon wrote:
Hotguy wrote:
Glaucon wrote:December curves are almost never smaller than the preceding October ones, so it's safe to say that this is going to be -12 at the very least.

Lol not safe to say at all but I can see where you're coming from..


I challenge you to find me a Dec PT that had a smaller curve than its preceding October curve.


Just because it never happened doesn't mean it never will... use that LSAT logic! :lol:


But the fact that it never happened implies a policy preference that one would have to positively show there's reason for the LSAT makers to abandon. It's extremely unlikely to happen now.
Last edited by Glaucon on Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

muzzy
Posts: 488
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 9:01 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby muzzy » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:48 pm

.
Last edited by muzzy on Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
snagglepuss
Posts: 1954
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 4:16 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby snagglepuss » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:49 pm

Just poured third glass of rye. The rest of you gaise are doing this wrong.

Also, meticulous curve speculation is a flame b/c most people keep referring to harder than average sections but the curve is set by the difficulty of individual questions not sections. I can think of a dozen questions that I imagine a majority of people got wrong (and 40+ questions no one probably got wrong).

062914123
Posts: 1846
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby 062914123 » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:50 pm

.
Last edited by 062914123 on Thu Jul 03, 2014 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

dosto
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am

Re: December 2013 LSAT waiting thread

Postby dosto » Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:50 pm

.
Last edited by dosto on Fri Sep 04, 2015 3:21 am, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Alexandros, amiliatoe, BrainsyK, Instrumental, Lawl_Schoolz, MSNbot Media, Pozzo, sethnoorzad, Vino.Veritas, Yahoo [Bot] and 11 guests