I can definitely relate to that.BLUERUFiO wrote:I clicked on my email so quickly and saw my score so fast that it was almost anti-climatic. I wish I would have taken a moment to revel in receiving the email.
Post removed. Forum
- Nonconsecutive
- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
- Nightrunner
- Posts: 5306
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 1:14 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Substitute chemistry teacher.BLUERUFiO wrote:I clicked on my email so quickly and saw my score so fast that it was almost anti-climatic. I wish I would have taken a moment to revel in receiving the email.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:17 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Anyone have issues with the writing sample pdf of their score? Mine has a grey icon for "cannot be clearly displayed." I'm a little freaked out here, since I'm applying ED and submitting this weekend.
Edit: I took my LSAT at Santa Clara University.
Edit: I took my LSAT at Santa Clara University.
- bombaysippin
- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:11 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
uhh why would the writing sample even matter...unless I'm reading what you're trying to say wrong.ljoandc wrote:Anyone have issues with the writing sample pdf of their score? Mine has a grey icon for "cannot be clearly displayed." I'm a little freaked out here, since I'm applying ED and submitting this weekend.
Edit: I took my LSAT at Santa Clara University.
-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 11:11 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
what was curve to 160?DaRascal wrote:160... Damnit.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ScottRiqui
- Posts: 3633
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
-29pech71 wrote:what was curve to 160?DaRascal wrote:160... Damnit.
The curve is posted back on page 194.
- BLUERUFiO
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:46 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Haha, nice catch. I want MOAR climate!Nightrunner wrote:Substitute chemistry teacher.BLUERUFiO wrote:I clicked on my email so quickly and saw my score so fast that it was almost anti-climatic. I wish I would have taken a moment to revel in receiving the email.
-
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 2:11 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
.
Last edited by 062914123 on Fri Jul 04, 2014 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Nightrunner
- Posts: 5306
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 1:14 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Nearsighted gynecologist.BLUERUFiO wrote:Haha, nice catch. I want MOAR climate!Nightrunner wrote:Substitute chemistry teacher.BLUERUFiO wrote:I clicked on my email so quickly and saw my score so fast that it was almost anti-climatic. I wish I would have taken a moment to revel in receiving the email.
- FlyingNorth
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:25 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Weird...must be a location thing. Same thing happened to me, same testing center.ljoandc wrote:Anyone have issues with the writing sample pdf of their score? Mine has a grey icon for "cannot be clearly displayed." I'm a little freaked out here, since I'm applying ED and submitting this weekend.
Edit: I took my LSAT at Santa Clara University.
However, like it was mentioned by someone else above. Who gives a shit?
- Nonconsecutive
- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Same here, though I thought that LR was quite weird all along.bee wrote:still in shock that the curve was -14
Not complaining though
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2013 1:17 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
It just freaked me out b/c of the note saying to contact LSAC immediately if it's not clearly displayed.FlyingNorth wrote:Weird...must be a location thing. Same thing happened to me, same testing center.ljoandc wrote:Anyone have issues with the writing sample pdf of their score? Mine has a grey icon for "cannot be clearly displayed." I'm a little freaked out here, since I'm applying ED and submitting this weekend.
Edit: I took my LSAT at Santa Clara University.
However, like it was mentioned by someone else above. Who gives a shit?
But if it happened to you too and from the same testing center, then they probably haven't uploaded it yet.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 9:04 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
I have no idea how I missed 5 on LG, I mean that wasn't a hard LG I didn't think. Oh well hopefully 169 is close enough to what I needed.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Hinshelwood
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:06 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Sorry I missed grey/gray day. For me, it was very anti-climactic. Went on vacation with the family in our RV over Christmas and New Years, 1/2 was driving-back day. Stuck in traffic outside of Chattanooga, so checked my phone for emails. Saw the email from LSAC, and told my wife "I guess scores are out today". Opened the email and read before the traffic started moving again. 165.
I was not sure what to feel at that moment, and I still am not sure. I really thought, walking out of the test, that I was in the 170's. On the flip side, I had told myself that 165 was all I needed. The only school I am applying to is a T2 in the area, applying for the PT evening program. My score is between 5 and 10 points higher than the 75th percentile at that school. Which is great, except that my GPA is only a 2.68. I was not a bad student, but should have worked harder. I've had 20 years of work experience in my field (engineering) since that time, so I'm not sure how much the GPA will affect me at admissions. I'm hoping that they will just look at the LSAT score and what good things that will do for their average . Any thoughts on if an addendum is warranted to try to explain that GPA?
On the test itself, I haven't reviewed all of the questions yet. Did not get in until 5am this morning. But I checked my sections, it is frustrating how much worse I did than on PTs. I was getting -1 per LR section consistently, but went -7 and -3. And -6 on games, which is also uncharacteristically bad. I got 3 wrong on the last game, not sure if I got a rule wrong or what. The -5 on RC is about par for the course.
Anyways, it's been fun waiting with all of you. Good luck to everyone!
I was not sure what to feel at that moment, and I still am not sure. I really thought, walking out of the test, that I was in the 170's. On the flip side, I had told myself that 165 was all I needed. The only school I am applying to is a T2 in the area, applying for the PT evening program. My score is between 5 and 10 points higher than the 75th percentile at that school. Which is great, except that my GPA is only a 2.68. I was not a bad student, but should have worked harder. I've had 20 years of work experience in my field (engineering) since that time, so I'm not sure how much the GPA will affect me at admissions. I'm hoping that they will just look at the LSAT score and what good things that will do for their average . Any thoughts on if an addendum is warranted to try to explain that GPA?
On the test itself, I haven't reviewed all of the questions yet. Did not get in until 5am this morning. But I checked my sections, it is frustrating how much worse I did than on PTs. I was getting -1 per LR section consistently, but went -7 and -3. And -6 on games, which is also uncharacteristically bad. I got 3 wrong on the last game, not sure if I got a rule wrong or what. The -5 on RC is about par for the course.
Anyways, it's been fun waiting with all of you. Good luck to everyone!
-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
165 is a very respectable score, take it in perspective of the percentile. First thing's first, appreciate the product of your hard work!Hinshelwood wrote:Sorry I missed grey/gray day. For me, it was very anti-climactic. Went on vacation with the family in our RV over Christmas and New Years, 1/2 was driving-back day. Stuck in traffic outside of Chattanooga, so checked my phone for emails. Saw the email from LSAC, and told my wife "I guess scores are out today". Opened the email and read before the traffic started moving again. 165.
I was not sure what to feel at that moment, and I still am not sure. I really thought, walking out of the test, that I was in the 170's. On the flip side, I had told myself that 165 was all I needed. The only school I am applying to is a T2 in the area, applying for the PT evening program. My score is between 5 and 10 points higher than the 75th percentile at that school. Which is great, except that my GPA is only a 2.68. I was not a bad student, but should have worked harder. I've had 20 years of work experience in my field (engineering) since that time, so I'm not sure how much the GPA will affect me at admissions. I'm hoping that they will just look at the LSAT score and what good things that will do for their average . Any thoughts on if an addendum is warranted to try to explain that GPA?
On the test itself, I haven't reviewed all of the questions yet. Did not get in until 5am this morning. But I checked my sections, it is frustrating how much worse I did than on PTs. I was getting -1 per LR section consistently, but went -7 and -3. And -6 on games, which is also uncharacteristically bad. I got 3 wrong on the last game, not sure if I got a rule wrong or what. The -5 on RC is about par for the course.
Anyways, it's been fun waiting with all of you. Good luck to everyone!
Also, your LSAT success (or shortfall) is relative to your goals. From your post it seems that you are aiming for a local T2? As long as you weave your whole application together with the utmost care and determination, you seem like you might have a fighting chance, perhaps a very good fighting chance.
Good luck with your application!
- Hinshelwood
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:06 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Correct about the local T2. I'm curious at what exactly you mean with "weave your whole application together with the utmost care and determination". Maybe I'm reading too much into that, but I want to make sure that I don't miss anything.JustHawkin wrote:
165 is a very respectable score, take it in perspective of the percentile. First thing's first, appreciate the product of your hard work!
Also, your LSAT success (or shortfall) is relative to your goals. From your post it seems that you are aiming for a local T2? As long as you weave your whole application together with the utmost care and determination, you seem like you might have a fighting chance, perhaps a very good fighting chance.
Good luck with your application!
-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Keep in mind I'm speaking from my 0L experience, so take my word with a grain of salt.Hinshelwood wrote:Correct about the local T2. I'm curious at what exactly you mean with "weave your whole application together with the utmost care and determination". Maybe I'm reading too much into that, but I want to make sure that I don't miss anything.JustHawkin wrote:
165 is a very respectable score, take it in perspective of the percentile. First thing's first, appreciate the product of your hard work!
Also, your LSAT success (or shortfall) is relative to your goals. From your post it seems that you are aiming for a local T2? As long as you weave your whole application together with the utmost care and determination, you seem like you might have a fighting chance, perhaps a very good fighting chance.
Good luck with your application!
But, I feel by being a non-traditional applicant you can try to groom you application, whether it be your personal statement, diversity statement, or optional statement/addendum, to show how you can out perform your 2.68. Granted a 2.68 is still that number they have to take on their reporting data, but painting the picture for them to show (not tell) how you are better than your numbers is always better than having them guess as to how you got that GPA or without them thinking "another person just simply stating they shoulda/coulda/woulda worked harder".
I think I'm making sense. Granted, from what I have gathered around here, stuff like this might only matter if you are truly on the cusp of acceptance. Just give it your best chance at success!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Hitchensian
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:34 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
I cannot imagine a set of circumstances that would lead someone in your position (20 yrs experience engineering; "wife"; only going to a crappy school, etc.) to think going to law school is a good idea.Hinshelwood wrote:Sorry I missed grey/gray day. For me, it was very anti-climactic. Went on vacation with the family in our RV over Christmas and New Years, 1/2 was driving-back day. Stuck in traffic outside of Chattanooga, so checked my phone for emails. Saw the email from LSAC, and told my wife "I guess scores are out today". Opened the email and read before the traffic started moving again. 165.
I was not sure what to feel at that moment, and I still am not sure. I really thought, walking out of the test, that I was in the 170's. On the flip side, I had told myself that 165 was all I needed. The only school I am applying to is a T2 in the area, applying for the PT evening program. My score is between 5 and 10 points higher than the 75th percentile at that school. Which is great, except that my GPA is only a 2.68. I was not a bad student, but should have worked harder. I've had 20 years of work experience in my field (engineering) since that time, so I'm not sure how much the GPA will affect me at admissions. I'm hoping that they will just look at the LSAT score and what good things that will do for their average . Any thoughts on if an addendum is warranted to try to explain that GPA?
On the test itself, I haven't reviewed all of the questions yet. Did not get in until 5am this morning. But I checked my sections, it is frustrating how much worse I did than on PTs. I was getting -1 per LR section consistently, but went -7 and -3. And -6 on games, which is also uncharacteristically bad. I got 3 wrong on the last game, not sure if I got a rule wrong or what. The -5 on RC is about par for the course.
Anyways, it's been fun waiting with all of you. Good luck to everyone!
Sorry if that's harsh, but I'm just being honest.
- rpupkin
- Posts: 5653
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 10:32 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
It's easy to be honest when you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.Hitchensian wrote:
I cannot imagine a set of circumstances that would lead someone in your position (20 yrs experience engineering; "wife"; only going to a crappy school, etc.) to think going to law school is a good idea.
Sorry if that's harsh, but I'm just being honest.
And why did you put "wife" in quotes? Are you implying that he isn't really married?
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
You are literally the worst on-topic poster.Hitchensian wrote:
I cannot imagine a set of circumstances that would lead someone in your position (20 yrs experience engineering; "wife"; only going to a crappy school, etc.) to think going to law school is a good idea.
Sorry if that's harsh, but I'm just being honest.
-
- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
OP should change the "decembre" to "december" to make it easier for future december test takers to find.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nightrunner
- Posts: 5306
- Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 1:14 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Well the first 170 pages of this thread is made up of post titles that say "Re: December 2013 Waiters Thread," so I'm pretty sure the search algorithm will be all right.chizzy wrote:OP should change the "decembre" to "december" to make it easier for future december test takers to find.
- Hinshelwood
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 9:06 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Maybe you're not thinking hard enough. How about if work is willing to pay 100% of the cost - would it be a good idea then? I think you need to work on your imagining skills. Oh, and your social skills too.Hitchensian wrote:I cannot imagine a set of circumstances that would lead someone in your position (20 yrs experience engineering; "wife"; only going to a crappy school, etc.) to think going to law school is a good idea.Hinshelwood wrote:Sorry I missed grey/gray day. For me, it was very anti-climactic. Went on vacation with the family in our RV over Christmas and New Years, 1/2 was driving-back day. Stuck in traffic outside of Chattanooga, so checked my phone for emails. Saw the email from LSAC, and told my wife "I guess scores are out today". Opened the email and read before the traffic started moving again. 165.
I was not sure what to feel at that moment, and I still am not sure. I really thought, walking out of the test, that I was in the 170's. On the flip side, I had told myself that 165 was all I needed. The only school I am applying to is a T2 in the area, applying for the PT evening program. My score is between 5 and 10 points higher than the 75th percentile at that school. Which is great, except that my GPA is only a 2.68. I was not a bad student, but should have worked harder. I've had 20 years of work experience in my field (engineering) since that time, so I'm not sure how much the GPA will affect me at admissions. I'm hoping that they will just look at the LSAT score and what good things that will do for their average . Any thoughts on if an addendum is warranted to try to explain that GPA?
On the test itself, I haven't reviewed all of the questions yet. Did not get in until 5am this morning. But I checked my sections, it is frustrating how much worse I did than on PTs. I was getting -1 per LR section consistently, but went -7 and -3. And -6 on games, which is also uncharacteristically bad. I got 3 wrong on the last game, not sure if I got a rule wrong or what. The -5 on RC is about par for the course.
Anyways, it's been fun waiting with all of you. Good luck to everyone!
Sorry if that's harsh, but I'm just being honest.
I wonder how many people ITT are looking at Tier 2 schools? I can't imagine that everyone is T14
-
- Posts: 4155
- Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
no part of a waiters thread needs to be read after the fact.chizzy wrote:OP should change the "decembre" to "december" to make it easier for future december test takers to find.
- BLUERUFiO
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 2:46 pm
Re: Decembre 2013 Waiters
Hinshel, I am looking at one or two TT schools. I am in persuit of a full ride and my goal is not big law so it makes sense for me to get a free ride. I'm debt averse.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login