PT70 S4 Q23

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
lawschool2014hopeful

Posts: 554
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:48 pm

PT70 S4 Q23

I honestly cannot articulate the difference between D and E other than a feel that D is more ridiculous, therefore, highlighting the parallel error better

Any one else?

Christine (MLSAT)

Posts: 357
Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 3:41 pm

Re: PT70 S4 Q23

jimmierock wrote:I honestly cannot articulate the difference between D and E other than a feel that D is more ridiculous, therefore, highlighting the parallel error better

Any one else?

(E) is essentially reversed.

Think of the original argument in abstract terms:

Almost every X has been Y.
This thing is Y.
Therefore, it will probably be X.

X = successful product
Y = massive TV ad campaign

(D) has the same pattern. X would be president, Y would be Ph.D.

(E) is flipped:

Almost every X has been Y.
Thing is X.
Therefore, it will probably by Y.

Y = profitable

It's really easy to miss that flip when you're just holding the information in your head. A quick and really basic shorthand can help you notice when the structure is identical or near-identical but the elements are in the wrong slots.

Hope that helps!

lawschool2014hopeful

Posts: 554
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:48 pm

Re: PT70 S4 Q23

Christine (MLSAT) wrote:
jimmierock wrote:I honestly cannot articulate the difference between D and E other than a feel that D is more ridiculous, therefore, highlighting the parallel error better

Any one else?

(E) is essentially reversed.

Think of the original argument in abstract terms:

Almost every X has been Y.
This thing is Y.
Therefore, it will probably be X.

X = successful product
Y = massive TV ad campaign

(D) has the same pattern. X would be president, Y would be Ph.D.

(E) is flipped:

Almost every X has been Y.
Thing is X.
Therefore, it will probably by Y.

Y = profitable

It's really easy to miss that flip when you're just holding the information in your head. A quick and really basic shorthand can help you notice when the structure is identical or near-identical but the elements are in the wrong slots.

Hope that helps!

Awesome thanks. Jesus, this flip felt so convoluted Not used to these more subtle conditionals. I was reading the stimulus as almost X was preceded by Y, and saw either D nor E has proceeding and proceded in staying confused.