Advice on what PT's to take going forward
Posted: Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:13 pm
Hey guys,
So I've taken about 24 PT's thus far, and I'm trying to decide which ones I should take next before I sit for the exam in December.
I'm currently scoring around 164-171 with no great consistency, but I pretty much have LG down, and RC is currently my weak point along with LG here and there.
My question to you folks is, seeing that I have taken these: http://i.imgur.com/fUJbZtl.jpg,(in red) PT's so far, what should I do?
I know the typical response is to try to take the most recent exams before the earlier ones because they are more likely to be similar to the current tests, but I have a slightly different situation.
I took the BP course, and in doing so much of the practice work they gave me is easily recognizable on the recent PT's (50-60) and slightly less abundant on the tests in the 40s and much less so on the earlier exams.
So would it be better to:
Take PT's 20-30 first because there is more fresh material?
Take PT's 50-60 even though I have seen much of the RC, LG, and a bit of the LR?
Retake PT's in the 60's(haven't seen material in 1-2+ months)?
I'm don't plan on exclusively focusing on any one of these three categories above, but merely trying to determine what the best course of action is in the next month.
Would really appreciate any suggestions. Thanks.
So I've taken about 24 PT's thus far, and I'm trying to decide which ones I should take next before I sit for the exam in December.
I'm currently scoring around 164-171 with no great consistency, but I pretty much have LG down, and RC is currently my weak point along with LG here and there.
My question to you folks is, seeing that I have taken these: http://i.imgur.com/fUJbZtl.jpg,(in red) PT's so far, what should I do?
I know the typical response is to try to take the most recent exams before the earlier ones because they are more likely to be similar to the current tests, but I have a slightly different situation.
I took the BP course, and in doing so much of the practice work they gave me is easily recognizable on the recent PT's (50-60) and slightly less abundant on the tests in the 40s and much less so on the earlier exams.
So would it be better to:
Take PT's 20-30 first because there is more fresh material?
Take PT's 50-60 even though I have seen much of the RC, LG, and a bit of the LR?
Retake PT's in the 60's(haven't seen material in 1-2+ months)?
I'm don't plan on exclusively focusing on any one of these three categories above, but merely trying to determine what the best course of action is in the next month.
Would really appreciate any suggestions. Thanks.