Top Law Schools

bee wrote:added. here's the updated post:

bee wrote:

mhaas wrote:I got ya, PM me if you need the link

hey guys,

if a lot of people are interested in reviewing in a chatroom, we may have to break into 2 groups. ime this sort of thing is more effective with small groups rather than a single large group of 10+ people.

to better coordinate, please chime in in response to this post if you're interested in reviewing PT 57 on sunday.

i just did a search of this thread. people who said they were interested:

tea
bee
mhaas
bbkk
dosto
thisiswater
jk
aajd2b
justhawkin
goldenboy
action90
minueting
arunanona09
nightingale
fianna13
brrrrcat
walket
becs
snagglepuss
santoki
retaking23
akechi
melodygreenleaf
esrom55

if you are NO LONGER INTERESTED, pls let me know so i can take your name off the list and try to get the logistics together.

eta: i will constantly update this list, so if your name IS NOT ON IT, that means that you won't receive a chatroom link

bee wrote:

PourMeTea wrote:Hey guys- I figured it was just easier to split it up randomly because we don't want one group to have many more than the others. Bee and I will probably each facilitate one of the two (unless someone else has experience and would like to step in, then that's no problem!) Please only switch your group if you have a conflict.

yup sorry guys the numbers are getting really lopsided (which defeats the purpose of having 2 groups in the first place)

sorry for all the inconvenience!

wtrc wrote:

thisiswater wrote:

wtrc wrote:New poll--- ways to tell WTRC that this is like... actually a study thread and he's being annoying because he misses the waiters thread too much and needs to find a new hobby

waiters still exists though...has it turned too weird for you these past couple days?

I mean, I like talking to y'all and all, but when the topic is just two TLSers having sex with latex free condoms... I need to mix it up a bit.

bee wrote: well i mean you still did assloads better than the vast majority of lsat takers...?

koalacity wrote:

neprep wrote:

wtrc wrote:
I mean, I like talking to y'all and all, but when the topic is just two TLSers having sex with latex free condoms... I need to mix it up a bit.

SAME BOAT.

The waiters thread now frightens me.

bee wrote: lol nep your language has become noticeably coarser since waiters. you're a degenerate like us nao.

koalacity wrote:On-topic question: would you guys be interested in reading study advice from me if I wrote something up? I mean, I'm not a retaker, so this wouldn't be retake-specific-more just general advice/tips/things I did.

koalacity wrote:On-topic question: would you guys be interested in reading study advice from me if I wrote something up? I mean, I'm not a retaker, so this wouldn't be retake-specific-more just general advice/tips/things I did.

koalacity wrote:On-topic question: would you guys be interested in reading study advice from me if I wrote something up? I mean, I'm not a retaker, so this wouldn't be retake-specific-more just general advice/tips/things I did.

koalacity wrote:On-topic question: would you guys be interested in reading study advice from me if I wrote something up? I mean, I'm not a retaker, so this wouldn't be retake-specific-more just general advice/tips/things I did.