Top Law Schools

.

I loved mine. LG-RC-LR-LR-RC

I liked having the LG to warm me up and then doing an RC while I was still fresh ( Though turned out to be exp) I always like doing 2 LRs in a row because I get on a roll and there was a break in between. and then I knew whatever section I had next the previous one was probably the EXP. So if I would have had LG I could relax knowing that was exp or RC I could know that it was probably real while the first was fake. LR would have been more complicated but I still think it was great.

For 69, I had LG-LG-LR-LR-RC, which was great.
For 70, I had LG-RC-LR-LR-RC, which was just okay.

Ideal would be: LG-RC-LG-LR-LR
Worst case: RC-LR-RC-LR-LG

Otunga wrote:

walterwhite wrote:i just think it's weird people get different versions of a test that's supposed to be standardized. it's an advantage to have 2 LG sections as opposed to 3 LRs or 2 reading sections.

You say this, but I way rather have 3 LRs or 2 RCs.

Yea, people are different with which section they'd prefer be the experimental, and where they'd like to see it. People also differ on what order they'd like the sections to be in. But the ridiculous number of studies done by LSAC on this suggest that it skews the scores much less than people (myself included) seem to think.

LG RC(exp) LR LR RC

LG first is awful. I would have preferred LR RC (exp) LG LR RC.
(Its like I always end up with RC Exp! WTF!)

rebexness wrote:LG RC(exp) LR LR RC

LG first is awful. I would have preferred LR RC (exp) LG LR RC.

Had the exact same -- LG RC (EXP) LR LR RC

I liked LG first. It was super easy so it boosted my confidence. Actually I found the first three sections really easy and at the break I was so pumped.

.... and then the next two sections came and I thought about cancelling my score

.