did anybody else not like their format?

dosto
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am

Re: did anybody else not like their format?

Postby dosto » Mon Oct 07, 2013 6:09 pm

.
Last edited by dosto on Tue Aug 25, 2015 3:05 am, edited 1 time in total.

Chriz
Posts: 279
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 8:33 pm

Re: did anybody else not like their format?

Postby Chriz » Mon Oct 07, 2013 6:21 pm

I loved mine. LG-RC-LR-LR-RC

I liked having the LG to warm me up and then doing an RC while I was still fresh ( Though turned out to be exp) I always like doing 2 LRs in a row because I get on a roll and there was a break in between. and then I knew whatever section I had next the previous one was probably the EXP. So if I would have had LG I could relax knowing that was exp or RC I could know that it was probably real while the first was fake. LR would have been more complicated but I still think it was great.

User avatar
RhymesLikeDimes
Posts: 403
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 12:58 pm

Re: did anybody else not like their format?

Postby RhymesLikeDimes » Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:20 pm

For 69, I had LG-LG-LR-LR-RC, which was great.
For 70, I had LG-RC-LR-LR-RC, which was just okay.

Ideal would be: LG-RC-LG-LR-LR
Worst case: RC-LR-RC-LR-LG

bp shinners
Posts: 3091
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2011 7:05 pm

Re: did anybody else not like their format?

Postby bp shinners » Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:18 am

Otunga wrote:
walterwhite wrote:i just think it's weird people get different versions of a test that's supposed to be standardized. it's an advantage to have 2 LG sections as opposed to 3 LRs or 2 reading sections.


You say this, but I way rather have 3 LRs or 2 RCs.


Yea, people are different with which section they'd prefer be the experimental, and where they'd like to see it. People also differ on what order they'd like the sections to be in. But the ridiculous number of studies done by LSAC on this suggest that it skews the scores much less than people (myself included) seem to think.

rebexness
Posts: 4163
Joined: Sun Jan 09, 2011 6:24 am

Re: did anybody else not like their format?

Postby rebexness » Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:55 pm

LG RC(exp) LR LR RC

LG first is awful. I would have preferred LR RC (exp) LG LR RC.
(Its like I always end up with RC Exp! WTF!)

User avatar
jk148706
Posts: 2499
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am

Re: did anybody else not like their format?

Postby jk148706 » Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:56 pm

rebexness wrote:LG RC(exp) LR LR RC

LG first is awful. I would have preferred LR RC (exp) LG LR RC.


Had the exact same -- LG RC (EXP) LR LR RC

I liked LG first. It was super easy so it boosted my confidence. Actually I found the first three sections really easy and at the break I was so pumped.

.... and then the next two sections came and I thought about cancelling my score

dosto
Posts: 784
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:50 am

Re: did anybody else not like their format?

Postby dosto » Tue Oct 08, 2013 1:13 pm

.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cherrygalore, Instrumental and 9 guests