Good point - I was assuming that alecks was completely burned out, but if he/she can focus enough to review, then doing so seems like the right call.zhenders wrote:I still say you ought to review today -- at least LR and RC. After you review, take the rest of the day off :-/ reviewing immediately after is super important -- if you review after you've forgotten your thought processes on each question, it's not nearly as useful.
February 2014 LSAT Study Group Forum
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:26 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
OK, this doesn't bode well for next week but does anyone else hate sitting for a complete PT? I'm sure the 2+ hours will go by much faster with the adrenaline pumping but not yet and it feels like a drag.
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:26 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Speaking as a retaker, the actual LSAT is a completely different feeling. The sections flew by for me, and during the break I was anxious to get back to the test.Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:OK, this doesn't bode well for next week but does anyone else hate sitting for a complete PT? I'm sure the 2+ hours will go by much faster with the adrenaline pumping but not yet and it feels like a drag.
I think that this is because (A) you can never fully convince yourself that a PT matters, while the LSAT definitely does and (B) taking the real LSAT is the only thing capable of distracting you from the pressure of taking the LSAT on game day (if that makes sense)
Either way, don't worry about it. Boredom will be the last thing going through your mind on game day.
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Yeah, that absolutely makes sense. And, unfortunately, I won't have the answer key next Saturday to score myself after each section.random number wrote:Speaking as a retaker, the actual LSAT is a completely different feeling. The sections flew by for me, and during the break I was anxious to get back to the test.Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:OK, this doesn't bode well for next week but does anyone else hate sitting for a complete PT? I'm sure the 2+ hours will go by much faster with the adrenaline pumping but not yet and it feels like a drag.
I think that this is because (A) you can never fully convince yourself that a PT matters, while the LSAT definitely does and (B) taking the real LSAT is the only thing capable of distracting you from the pressure of taking the LSAT on game day (if that makes sense)
Either way, don't worry about it. Boredom will be the last thing going through your mind on game day.
Not sure that I'm bored but I dread sitting down to PT only because it takes so.damn.long.
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
random number wrote:Good point - I was assuming that alecks was completely burned out, but if he/she can focus enough to review, then doing so seems like the right call.zhenders wrote:I still say you ought to review today -- at least LR and RC. After you review, take the rest of the day off :-/ reviewing immediately after is super important -- if you review after you've forgotten your thought processes on each question, it's not nearly as useful.
Sorry mate, I posted before seeing your response!
RN's totally right of course, if you are truly burnt out. Just be cautious about letting too much time pass
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- alecks
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:24 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Yeah I think I will review RC and LR right now. For some reason I took 10 minutes on that first game (which was the 4th section) and then started freaking out the rest of the section, which wasn't good. Also the 5th LR section I was freaking out so I also did poorly.random number wrote:Good point - I was assuming that alecks was completely burned out, but if he/she can focus enough to review, then doing so seems like the right call.zhenders wrote:I still say you ought to review today -- at least LR and RC. After you review, take the rest of the day off :-/ reviewing immediately after is super important -- if you review after you've forgotten your thought processes on each question, it's not nearly as useful.
I took a few deep breaths so I feel a little bit better but I think I will benefit from the rest of the day off after reviewing. Guh, my last fresh PT too. Also I'm a girl haha
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:26 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Sounds like a solid plan!alecks wrote: Yeah I think I will review RC and LR right now. For some reason I took 10 minutes on that first game (which was the 4th section) and then started freaking out the rest of the section, which wasn't good. Also the 5th LR section I was freaking out so I also did poorly.
I took a few deep breaths so I feel a little bit better but I think I will benefit from the rest of the day off after reviewing. Guh, my last fresh PT too. Also I'm a girl haha
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Brief but SUPER IMPORTANT diversion from your studying:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l ... 520590127F
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l ... 520590127F
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
alecks wrote:Yeah I think I will review RC and LR right now. For some reason I took 10 minutes on that first game (which was the 4th section) and then started freaking out the rest of the section, which wasn't good. Also the 5th LR section I was freaking out so I also did poorly.random number wrote:Good point - I was assuming that alecks was completely burned out, but if he/she can focus enough to review, then doing so seems like the right call.zhenders wrote:I still say you ought to review today -- at least LR and RC. After you review, take the rest of the day off :-/ reviewing immediately after is super important -- if you review after you've forgotten your thought processes on each question, it's not nearly as useful.
I took a few deep breaths so I feel a little bit better but I think I will benefit from the rest of the day off after reviewing. Guh, my last fresh PT too. Also I'm a girl haha
Sorry alecks! I'm usually pretty conscious of gendered pronouns!
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Thu May 30, 2013 8:15 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
171'd PT62 (-4 LG, -6 LR, -3 RC). A little disappointed because it should have been -2 LR. Four really dumb mistakes in LR, as well as one really stupid one in RC. The stained glass game wasn't so much hard as it was time consuming, leaving me a little unnder ten minutes to finish the next two games. Still looking for that elusive 175. Last five PTs were 170, 172, 174, 173, and 171 . Really hoping for a 173+ on game day -- but it looks like I'm cutting it rather close.
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Its snowing buckets here!
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Aaaaand -8 on an LR section, half coming on the same game.
Any PROTIPS for mastering conditional games? The diagrams are all right so the screwups are happening in the questions.
Any PROTIPS for mastering conditional games? The diagrams are all right so the screwups are happening in the questions.
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
I can handle games as long as i don't see conditionals in there if i see conditionals i get a headache immediatelyBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Aaaaand -8 on an LR section, half coming on the same game.
Any PROTIPS for mastering conditional games? The diagrams are all right so the screwups are happening in the questions.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:44 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Do you know all your conditionals? Which game is this referring to in particular?Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Aaaaand -8 on an LR section, half coming on the same game.
Any PROTIPS for mastering conditional games? The diagrams are all right so the screwups are happening in the questions.
A lot of times I just do a diagram for each If, then rule so I can see how it effects all the pieces. It takes less time than trying to do it in your head once you get to the questions.
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Here's my diagram of G3, PT 45.Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Aaaaand -8 on an LR section, half coming on the same game.
Any PROTIPS for mastering conditional games? The diagrams are all right so the screwups are happening in the questions.
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Its not showing upBaby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Here's my diagram of G3, PT 45.Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Aaaaand -8 on an LR section, half coming on the same game.
Any PROTIPS for mastering conditional games? The diagrams are all right so the screwups are happening in the questions.
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Look againMiracle wrote: Its not showing up
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Gor it!Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Look againMiracle wrote: Its not showing up
-
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:44 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Here's my diagram of G3, PT 45.Baby_Got_Feuerbach wrote:Aaaaand -8 on an LR section, half coming on the same game.
Any PROTIPS for mastering conditional games? The diagrams are all right so the screwups are happening in the questions.
Sorry but you diagrammed backwards.
It should be
1. U --> S --> W
No W --> No S --> No U
2. No Y --> R
No R --> Y
3. W --> No T & No R
T or R --> No W
You can combine a few of these rules but I like to do it like this:
Write out multiples of
R S T U W Y Z
R S T U W Y Z
R S T U W Y Z
R S T U W Y Z
R S T U W Y Z
Then circle the ones in and cross the ones out.
-
- Posts: 5215
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:16 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
PT 61
RC -3 (rough)
LR1 -2 (one of these was a misbubble... yikes)
LG -0 (drilling paying off? or just an easy section?)
LR2 -0 (super confused by this one. I felt sluggish the entire time and zoned out quite a bit during this section.)
Raw score: 96/101
Scaled: 177
I'm really excited because this PT finally marks the last of my 171 slump no longer being included in my 5 PT average, which is now 174.6. Still trying to increase that to 176 so I can hopefully snag a 173 on test day even with the traditional decrease, but I don't think it's going to happen, since I've never scored 178+. I guess we'll see. Regardless, I'm happy with this score and will now celebrate by ordering Indian food.
RC -3 (rough)
LR1 -2 (one of these was a misbubble... yikes)
LG -0 (drilling paying off? or just an easy section?)
LR2 -0 (super confused by this one. I felt sluggish the entire time and zoned out quite a bit during this section.)
Raw score: 96/101
Scaled: 177
I'm really excited because this PT finally marks the last of my 171 slump no longer being included in my 5 PT average, which is now 174.6. Still trying to increase that to 176 so I can hopefully snag a 173 on test day even with the traditional decrease, but I don't think it's going to happen, since I've never scored 178+. I guess we'll see. Regardless, I'm happy with this score and will now celebrate by ordering Indian food.
Last edited by xylocarp on Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:26 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Nice score!xylocarp wrote:PT 61
RC -3 (rough)
LR1 -2 (one of these was a misbubble... yikes)
LG -0 (drilling paying off? or just an easy section?)
LR2 -0 (super confused by this one. I felt sluggish the entire time and zoned out quite a bit during this section.)
Raw score: 96/101
Scaled: 177
I'm really excited because this PT finally marks the last of my 171 slump no longer being included in my 5 PT average, which is now 174.6. Still trying to increase that to 176 so I can hopefully snag a 173 on test day even with the traditional decrease, but I don't think it's going to happen, since I've never scored 178+. I guess we'll see. Regardless, I'm happy with this score and will now celebrate by ordering Indian food.
I'm glad that I'm not the only one who thought that the RC was tough
Also, which LR1s did you miss? I ask because I also missed two in that section?
Edit: Just did the math and my 5 test average is almost the same as yours (174.4). We can do this!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 977
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:22 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Impromptu TinyChat tonight to discuss plans with one week out?
-
- Posts: 5215
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:16 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Yeah that last passage was super tough. All of my RC mistakes were legitimate deficiencies in my comprehension of the readings, not stupid or silly or anything.random number wrote:Nice score!xylocarp wrote:PT 61
RC -3 (rough)
LR1 -2 (one of these was a misbubble... yikes)
LG -0 (drilling paying off? or just an easy section?)
LR2 -0 (super confused by this one. I felt sluggish the entire time and zoned out quite a bit during this section.)
Raw score: 96/101
Scaled: 177
I'm really excited because this PT finally marks the last of my 171 slump no longer being included in my 5 PT average, which is now 174.6. Still trying to increase that to 176 so I can hopefully snag a 173 on test day even with the traditional decrease, but I don't think it's going to happen, since I've never scored 178+. I guess we'll see. Regardless, I'm happy with this score and will now celebrate by ordering Indian food.
I'm glad that I'm not the only one who thought that the RC was tough
Also, which LR1s did you miss? I ask because I also missed two in that section?
Edit: Just did the math and my 5 test average is almost the same as yours (174.4). We can do this!
For LR I missed 16 and 20 but 16 was a misbubble. Which did you miss?
Last edited by xylocarp on Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 127
- Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2013 8:49 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
I can't understand SA questions to save my life anymore. I understand what I'm trying to do, but I can't seem to translate the ideas/concepts... It's like my reading comprehension for those questions alone falls back to a fourth grade level.
um... suggestions?
um... suggestions?
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
What is SA?cloy26 wrote:I can't understand SA questions to save my life anymore. I understand what I'm trying to do, but I can't seem to translate the ideas/concepts... It's like my reading comprehension for those questions alone falls back to a fourth grade level.
um... suggestions?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login