February 2014 LSAT Study Group Forum
- BankruptMe
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 6:02 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
I have so much schoolwork to do. I am probably just going to get up really early and spend some time on LSAT. This sucks
-
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:44 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
.
Last edited by Nicolena. on Sun Jan 26, 2014 9:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
no worries.
Last edited by zhenders on Sun Jan 26, 2014 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:44 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
.
Last edited by Nicolena. on Sun Jan 26, 2014 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:44 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
How? This section always kills me.Miracle wrote:I have a confession to make: Reading comprehension section might be my favorite section.
I plan to drill RC all next week along with PTs. Do you guys suggest using the 50s or use the Cambridge packet? I read somewhere that it's better to drill a full RC section rather than the by type.
And thanks zhenders.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Am I missing something? Where are you getting five games from? Each section has only four games. It could be that my brain is fried. Lolzhenders wrote:I highly recommend re-doing games, actually. I'm more or less back to where I was a while ago on LG, and the way I got there (-0/-1) was by re-doing games. I actually have a pretty crazy system that DEFINITELY works... Try it if you'd like I've recommended it to a few people, and they've benefited from it.Miracle wrote:Hey, have a question for you.zhenders wrote:What's everyone's testing schedule look like for this coming week?
I'm going to do 2 or 3 more LG sections tonight; PT 65 and 66 are Tues/Thurs this week, and tomorrow I'm kicking off drilling with a RC test (taken like a normal test, but with only RC sections).
Do you re-drill the same games/the ones you already completed? Do you re-drill the ones you did "well" on?
Zac's weird LG study method:
Day 1: Print 4 copies each of 5 games. Do all of those games, and mark your times on them -- take as long as you need to get every question perfect, but don't waste any time. Grade, then IMMEDIATELY re-do all of the games. This time, force yourself to logically eliminate all wrong answer choices before choosing the right answer (this is crucial -- without doing this, re-doing games is useless because you'll just remember half the answers).
Now you have 2 copies of these 5 games left -- we'll call these (A) games.
Day 2: 4 copies each of 5 different games. Repeat day 1 with these games (we can call them (B) games). After you're done, do your 3rd copies of your (A) games.
At this point, you will have done your (A) games 3 times and your (B) games 2 times. Put the 4th copy of your (A) games aside, and repeat Day 2 for a new set of 5 games; after this, you'll set the 4th copies of your (B) games aside.
Do this until you have 15 or 20 games put aside (your 4th copies of A, B, and C -- and D if you're up for it-- games). Take a day off from LG, and the next day, do all of them back-to-back, making sure to force yourself to logically eliminate all wrong answers before selecting a right one.
I know this sounds a little strange, but the idea is to make the process extremely fluid, and to ingrain the methods. In doing this, it becomes super obvious that all LG are basically the same -- and by forcingi yourself to go through the sames again but actually eliminate wrong answer choices, you develop really good habits.
Convoy, that sounds good -- but I might think about reversing that; I think 3/2 is great, and will totally work -- but on the other hand, I don't know if I would want to drill too much the week of the test -- I might focus more on PT's -- so I might drill more next week and only do 2 PTs, then cut out drilling (or back it off) and do 3 PTs the week of the test
Either way though, looks good to me!
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Miracle, I know it's confusing lol I'm sorry.
You could use 4 games, or 6 or 10 or whatever number -- it's by game, not by section
You could use 4 games, or 6 or 10 or whatever number -- it's by game, not by section
-
- Posts: 5215
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:16 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
I'm taking the typical 15 credits and I have two jobs and an internship, but most of my classes are (intentionally) pretty light on the work load, so it's actually been not so bad for me. If I were taking the same classes I took two semesters ago, I'd be... dead. It also helps that my SO has taken up all of the household chores that we used to share.jaylawyer09 wrote:how are you surviving? I am taking 12 hrs just so I can have enough time to take PTs and drill.90convoy wrote:I'm taking 20 credit hours at school, so its kind of difficultBentleyLittle wrote:Does anyone in this thread work full-time/commute? It seems like yall have pretty open schedules for studying. I'm jealous
Last edited by xylocarp on Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
I make use of every minute that I have. 4 credits are online too so that helps.jaylawyer09 wrote:how are you surviving? I am taking 12 hrs just so I can have enough time to take PTs and drill.90convoy wrote:I'm taking 20 credit hours at school, so its kind of difficultBentleyLittle wrote:Does anyone in this thread work full-time/commute? It seems like yall have pretty open schedules for studying. I'm jealous
Sometimes I drill while I'm on the toilet
-
- Posts: 5215
- Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:16 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
THIS. I used to go out with friends, watch some TV, read books...90convoy wrote:I make use of every minute that I have.
Last edited by xylocarp on Tue Jan 30, 2018 12:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Indeed. While I'm fortunate to have been able to put aside everything but this test until its over, it's all about time budgeting and doing what you have to do.
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
zhenders, I just finished that LG strategy you were talking about. damn
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Lol sorry man, it's intense, I know. But it works.90convoy wrote:zhenders, I just finished that LG strategy you were talking about. damn
-
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 12:44 am
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
I feel like this is what you should be doing when you drill any section - Blind review for LR or even RC.zhenders wrote:This time, force yourself to logically eliminate all wrong answer choices before choosing the right answer (this is crucial -- without doing this, re-doing games is useless because you'll just remember half the answers).
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 4:12 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
172 on PT64. S my d, Dostoyevsky
Did anyone else get slowed down on the LG on this one though?
Did anyone else get slowed down on the LG on this one though?
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Nicolena. wrote:I feel like this is what you should be doing when you drill any section - Blind review for LR or even RC.zhenders wrote:This time, force yourself to logically eliminate all wrong answer choices before choosing the right answer (this is crucial -- without doing this, re-doing games is useless because you'll just remember half the answers).
I agree that you should always be able to -- but ii also think that especially with LR (and to some extent LG and RC) -- zoning in on the right answer and moving on is a crucial skill. On LR questions 1-12 when PTing, I eliminate all answer choices for maybe 1 or 2 of them, but most of them I scan for what makes sense and move on.
I definitely agree that when blind reviewing though, you must sometimes when drilling, it should be 100% for accuracy -- but I think you have to practice speed, too
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Bicycles was tough, but the other games didn't feel bad; I didn't have much time left, but I made it. I must have spent 13 minutes on bicycles though.ballsoharduniversity wrote:172 on PT64. S my d, Dostoyevsky
Did anyone else get slowed down on the LG on this one though?
And -- Dostoevsky is my boy.
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Did it work?90convoy wrote:zhenders, I just finished that LG strategy you were talking about. damn
What is your opinion on it?
- 90convoy
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 8:59 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
I feel like it could be beneficial. Definitely a brain workout.Miracle wrote:Did it work?90convoy wrote:zhenders, I just finished that LG strategy you were talking about. damn
What is your opinion on it?
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
I trust you. I will try it as well. Ill share my opinion on it as well.90convoy wrote:I feel like it could be beneficial. Definitely a brain workout.Miracle wrote:Did it work?90convoy wrote:zhenders, I just finished that LG strategy you were talking about. damn
What is your opinion on it?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- zhenders
- Posts: 943
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:21 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Perhaps I ought to rename it "Zac's LGauntlet". Hope it ends up working for you both.
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 9:09 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
That passage is one the rewards tracking view points. There's 4. Author, two critics, and Dostoyevsky. One of the critics viewpoints is obscured.ballsoharduniversity wrote:172 on PT64. S my d, Dostoyevsky
Did anyone else get slowed down on the LG on this one though?
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
Lol we shall see. I will inform youzhenders wrote:Perhaps I ought to rename it "Zac's LGauntlet". Hope it ends up working for you both.
-
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:25 pm
Re: February 2014 LSAT Study Group
The phrase "it presupposes what it attempts to prove" always gets me. I looked it up in manhattan LR under abstract language however they don't have any examples of it.
Would someone elaborate on it for me. Provide me with an example of what is meant by it? It always gets me.
Would someone elaborate on it for me. Provide me with an example of what is meant by it? It always gets me.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login