PT 62 section 2 #16 (Seeking input)

jvaugh57
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 2:58 pm

PT 62 section 2 #16 (Seeking input)

Postby jvaugh57 » Sun Aug 04, 2013 10:05 am

Premise:
Snoring-->Serious abnormalities

Conclusion:
Snoring causes damage

I see the correlation to causation fallacy (now), but when I was doing this under timed conditions that seemed like a slight equivocation. After seeing the "E" was the answer: Abnormalities do not cause snoring(thereby strengthening by removing alternate cause), I realized that I should have looked more critically at this.

Is this the gist of the problem, did I just miss that "serious abnormalities" and "damage" are equivalent terms or is there more to it?


LSAT minds greater than mine please feel free to chime in...



Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cianchetta0, KtLaw747, mrgstephe, ngogirl12, Tazewell and 11 guests