"takes for granted" Forum

Prepare for the LSAT or discuss it with others in this forum.
Post Reply
mistd

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 11:52 am

"takes for granted"

Post by mistd » Fri Aug 02, 2013 9:54 am

In which cases would the speaker in the stimulus be taking a certain thing for granted?
I see that they would state, from their premises, a conclusion that seems to be a bit of a stretch but when I pick that answer, it is wrong.
Examples would be great.

kaiser

Gold
Posts: 3019
Joined: Mon May 09, 2011 11:34 pm

Re: "takes for granted"

Post by kaiser » Fri Aug 02, 2013 9:56 am

"Takes for granted" = assumes. So, when picking that answer, make sure that someone is actually assuming something in their argument. Of course, an assumption is simply the use of an unstated premise.

User avatar
bbkk

Silver
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm

Re: "takes for granted"

Post by bbkk » Fri Aug 02, 2013 11:06 am

Example:

If I say,
"orange has vitamin C therefore you should eat it"

I "take for granted" or "assume" that "you should eat anything that has vitamin C." (this is the unstated premise, or assumption)

Is this clear? I try to make it simple, but not sure if it helps.

mistd

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 11:52 am

Re: "takes for granted"

Post by mistd » Fri Aug 02, 2013 5:35 pm

It does! Thanks to both of you. That's what I suspected but now I feel more sure.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”