How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

allison34363
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby allison34363 » Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:02 pm

RC Bible was HUGE for me. Great investment.

User avatar
TheElyrian
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 7:28 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby TheElyrian » Sat Dec 05, 2009 4:04 pm

allison34363 wrote:RC Bible was HUGE for me. Great investment.


Seriously? I had heard that it wasn't worth the money. Hmm....

allison34363
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby allison34363 » Sun Dec 13, 2009 6:04 pm

TheElyrian wrote:
allison34363 wrote:RC Bible was HUGE for me. Great investment.


Seriously? I had heard that it wasn't worth the money. Hmm....


No it helped me a bunch.

jmoon1
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby jmoon1 » Sun Dec 13, 2009 11:41 pm

Hey, you point out that we should read a good book on informal logic. I just ordered Logic Made Easy by Deb Bennett as I've heard good things.

Did I hear right?

dennis the menace
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2008 2:47 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby dennis the menace » Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:40 am

JDewey wrote:2) Pick up a good book on INFORMAL logic. I hear people saying that formal logic important, believe me, for this test INFORMAL logic is actually what you want to study. I think people are confusing the two. I am particularly fond of "Informal Logic: A handbook for critical argument" by Douglas N. Walton.


I liked Logic and Contemporary Rhetoric: The Use of Reason in Everyday Life by Nancy M. Cavender and Howard Kahane

User avatar
IHaveDietMoxie
Posts: 137
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:54 am

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby IHaveDietMoxie » Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:19 am

Intro to Logic

Copi/Cohen

has exercises, covers informal and formal, is very thorough, end of story

User avatar
dogged
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2009 2:22 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby dogged » Tue Dec 15, 2009 12:37 pm

jmoon1 wrote:Hey, you point out that we should read a good book on informal logic. I just ordered Logic Made Easy by Deb Bennett as I've heard good things.

Did I hear right?


I picked it up today. Plan on reading it over the next month.

EmVan
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:26 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby EmVan » Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:29 am

dogged wrote:
jmoon1 wrote:Hey, you point out that we should read a good book on informal logic. I just ordered Logic Made Easy by Deb Bennett as I've heard good things.

Did I hear right?


I picked it up today. Plan on reading it over the next month.


I read it a week prior to starting my LSAT studying. It's alright I guess. Nothing spectacular though.

allison34363
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby allison34363 » Fri Dec 18, 2009 12:28 pm

EmVan wrote:
dogged wrote:
jmoon1 wrote:Hey, you point out that we should read a good book on informal logic. I just ordered Logic Made Easy by Deb Bennett as I've heard good things.

Did I hear right?


I picked it up today. Plan on reading it over the next month.


I read it a week prior to starting my LSAT studying. It's alright I guess. Nothing spectacular though.


No? It helped me a lot.

jmoon1
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:26 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby jmoon1 » Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:20 pm

allison34363 wrote:
EmVan wrote:
dogged wrote:
jmoon1 wrote:Hey, you point out that we should read a good book on informal logic. I just ordered Logic Made Easy by Deb Bennett as I've heard good things.

Did I hear right?


I picked it up today. Plan on reading it over the next month.


I read it a week prior to starting my LSAT studying. It's alright I guess. Nothing spectacular though.


No? It helped me a lot.


Started reading it last night...seems quite good and I'm enjoying it. I think it'll help clear my head and keep me aware of fallacies.

allison34363
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby allison34363 » Sun Dec 20, 2009 8:49 pm

It's a great foundation to build on.

User avatar
3|ink
Posts: 7331
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 5:23 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby 3|ink » Sun Dec 20, 2009 10:40 pm

I wish I read this post 3 months ago. I had considered reading a really boring book like The Wealth of Nations to keep my focused through the boring material on the test. That would have made my LR studying much easier.

14yearplan
Posts: 58
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:28 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby 14yearplan » Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:49 pm

My bit of advice, although no 180 here....

Do not ignore your strong section at any time. i.e. If you're great at LG's, and not so great at RC, make sure you still do a game every couple of days to stay strong at it. Same works for the other sections. And do not, do not, do not shy away from staying up on LR because it really is about twice as important to your score as the other sections.

Taylor your studies towards your weaknesses, but do not get cocky with your strengths--always stay on top of all of it. Each section tests a similar, yet all too different set of skills, and the learning curve for each section differs, as well. Once you get LG's, for example, your scoring will immediately spike. LR, and more so, RC, are more of a gradual learning curve. They take time. I highly disagree with any suggestion that more analytical reading now will not help your brain for the test. You can understand all the concepts, but the trick is to predict the answers and gain the confidence in your answer choice which will allow you to finish the test with time to spare. What worked for me was reading interesting Supreme Court opinions and analyzing them. This made a world of a difference in my RC scores, and immensely helped me gain the much needed time to finish all the passages in time.

Patience, optimism, and a holistic approach (as op stated) are the keys.

allison34363
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby allison34363 » Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:59 pm

3|ink wrote:I wish I read this post 3 months ago. I had considered reading a really boring book like The Wealth of Nations to keep my focused through the boring material on the test. That would have made my LR studying much easier.


Less TV, more reading did it for me.

panjam09
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 2:58 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby panjam09 » Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:15 pm

14yearplan wrote:My bit of advice, although no 180 here....

Do not ignore your strong section at any time. i.e. If you're great at LG's, and not so great at RC, make sure you still do a game every couple of days to stay strong at it. Same works for the other sections. And do not, do not, do not shy away from staying up on LR because it really is about twice as important to your score as the other sections.

Taylor your studies towards your weaknesses, but do not get cocky with your strengths--always stay on top of all of it. Each section tests a similar, yet all too different set of skills, and the learning curve for each section differs, as well. Once you get LG's, for example, your scoring will immediately spike. LR, and more so, RC, are more of a gradual learning curve. They take time. I highly disagree with any suggestion that more analytical reading now will not help your brain for the test. You can understand all the concepts, but the trick is to predict the answers and gain the confidence in your answer choice which will allow you to finish the test with time to spare. What worked for me was reading interesting Supreme Court opinions and analyzing them. This made a world of a difference in my RC scores, and immensely helped me gain the much needed time to finish all the passages in time.

Patience, optimism, and a holistic approach (as op stated) are the keys.



I agree. If you ignore your strengths they can soon become your weaknesses.

User avatar
Ken
Posts: 923
Joined: Sat Jun 11, 2005 6:22 am

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby Ken » Mon Dec 28, 2009 2:20 pm

The following is going to be cleaned up and edited in an article, but since scores were released today it seemed beneficial to post the following upcoming article. The formatting will not be good in the forum so a cleaner (and fully edited) version is forthcoming, but this is article is quite goood and was also written by a TLS member who also scored a 180 solely via self-study:

I scored a 180 on the LSAT, and it was due in large part to advice I found on this site. In this article I hope I can give a little back to the site and help others to reach their goals on the test.

If you are looking to strengthen your law school application, know that huge gains on the LSAT are possible, and that your LSAT score is probably the main determinant of which school you’ll go to and what kind of financial aid you’ll get. Some people mistake the LSAT for a test of intelligence, and thus assume that their score won’t budge through studying. Never mind that new research suggests that what we understand as ‘intelligence’ can be improved through study. Some TLS users have reported a score jump of 20 points. Did they suddenly jump from average ‘intelligence’ to the top 2% of college graduates?

I took a diagnostic a while back and I was pleased to see a 168. I thought, “All right! I’ll study for a couple weeks and take a couple preptests to raise that to 170+, and I’ll be set!” Fortunately, I fell short of my goal, because I was forced to realize how naïve I’d been and also how much more I could improve if I worked at it. I came back later after a solid three months of filling my head with nothing but flaws in reasoning, the status of women in medieval English law, and Abdul, Becky, Charm, Don Juan, Eiji, and Francine’s seating arrangements. The effort paid off.

In TLS’s LSAT preparation forum you will find a wide variety of opinions about the best study methods. Some posters insist that LSAT courses from the major test prep companies are worthless, and others say that they really do help. At the very least, I can tell you that they are not necessary to score at the highest level on the test, because I never took one. In my personal opinion, they may be a bad idea depending on how high you hope to score. My own improvements on the test came from finding what worked best for me, rather than following a method devised to work for thousands of students.

Much of what you need to know can be distilled to this:
-Though exceptional, plenty of TLS users raised their score by as many as 20 points over their initial diagnostic.
-This generally involves at least three months of hardcore study.
-To do the same, you want to take at least 30 official PrepTests timed properly and with a bubble sheet.
-You must thoroughly review your mistakes.
-Help your brain switch to text processing mode by reading in your free time.
-Find methods of attack that work best for you.

Create a Study Plan

TLS poster pithypike wrote up a very detailed post outlining a plan to assault the LSAT with special attention paid to the Logic Games (LG) section. You should consider following it because many TLS users swear by it. At the very least, you should create a similar study plan and stick to it.

Look to do at least 30 official PrepTests over at least three months. Some people do more PrepTests over a longer period of time, but I would say 30 tests and three months are the minimums. Each week I would do a full length PrepTest on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays. After about three weeks, I started doing four games sections that I'd seen before on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

When deciding which PrepTests to use, the more recent they are, the better. At some point around June 2001, LSAC stopped writing the test themselves and handed the job over to ACT, Inc. Many people believe that the test has gone through subtle but significant changes as a result. Not everyone agrees on what the effects of these changes are. Since most people go through the tests in chronological order, I think there is some bias toward thinking the new tests are “easier,” when in fact the person preparing is becoming more skilled. Nevertheless, I found the Logical Reasoning and Logic Games sections to be easier on the newer tests, which Reading Comprehension probably became more difficult.

If you’re on a budget, the earlier books of 10 PrepTests will be very attractive, but you should also purchase a healthy number of the later tests. You might think that they’re overpriced, but they may literally be worth their weight in gold if you get into the school of your dreams or if you’re offered a full scholarship because of your LSAT score. I strongly recommend using newer PrepTests close to gameday so that you are accustomed to them.

It’s easy to lose time or points because of errors on the bubble sheet. Practice with one! It took a long time before I found a bubbling strategy that worked best for me in each section. I settled on page by page in LR and LG, and question by question in RC. You’ll need to find what works best for you. Bubbling takes time out of your 35 minutes per section, so you should practice with a bubble sheet if only for that reason. If you get to the point where you can finish sections with time to spare, quickly checking your bubbling is an excellent idea.

In the next three sections I’ll tell you a little about what worked for me. What worked for me may not necessarily work for you, but this should give you an idea of the kinds of things you need to be thinking about when you’re reviewing your finished PrepTests. My advice may also be old news for you, but this is what I felt would have been very beneficial to know. If you haven’t done a PrepTest or two yet, you can stop reading here and come back when you’ve seen the test.

Specific advice for Logic Games (LG)

If you’re like most people, LG will be the most foreign section type for you. The good news is that a decent number of TLS users eventually manage achieve consistently perfect scores in this section. As with most everything in life (and other LSAT sections), repetition is the key to improving in LG.

Most people will probably want some system to give their thinking structure. Games were certainly my weakness and it took forever for me to get them down. I originally looked at one of the Kaplan books, but eventually settled on the Powerscore Games Bible. It’s not important to follow a system religiously, even if it calls itself the Bible.

Although, repetition will do a lot of the work for you if you let it, you also need to think of general strategies to improve. The broad instructions in the Games Bible should work for everyone. Start by diagramming the game and fixing its rules and variables in your mind for a couple minutes. Then attack the questions. How you do this is, in the end, up to you. As you gain more experience in games, you’ll find the wisdom in your book’s system, but also what you can throw out or adapt. For instance, for the sake of clarity, a system may suggest you represent a rule like this:
M N
D/A A/D


I found this to be too complicated both to write and read. It was easier for me to write it this way:
M N
DA DA

Find what works best for you!

For a long time, I was spending too much time writing out useless information that wasn't necessary to answer the questions. Make sure you read and understand the entire question before you begin working on it. Let’s look at a “linear game” to illustrate this. Linear games often have you placing people in order from 1 to 7, or factory visits in chronological order on a schedule. Here’s a simple one:

A, B, C, D, E, F, and G must be inspected once each, once per day on consecutive days of a week.
E will be inspected directly before F. [EF]
B will be inspected before C. B<C
A is inspected second. A2
(etc., this game would probably have more rules, but they’re irrelevant right now)

My setup would look like this:

A B<C D [EF] G

A
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
F F E
E B
C

Now, let’s tackle the second question:

2. If D is inspected fourth…

At this point I would mistakenly stop reading the question and begin writing out the implications and possibilities. If D is inspected fourth, then the [EF] block can only be in one of two spots:
A B<C D [EF] G
A D C/G E F
A D E F C/G
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Look at that! I made a beautiful diagram showing both possible positions of [EF]! (Stacking two possibilities is the best way for me to understand them.) I even made inferences as far as C and G. Now I can definitely answer the question. Let’s continue reading it:

…the sixth day must be occupied by:
(A) B or G
(B) B or C
(C) E or A
(D) E or F
(E) A or F

I easily find the answer is D. The only problem is I wasted time worrying about C and G when I didn’t need to go that far to answer the question. Read the whole question and preferably also the answer choices before you start working!

If you’re like me and most other people, “grouping games” will be challenging. In these games, you’re usually sorting people into two groups. In general, in grouping games you’ll help yourself by doing a couple quick hypotheticals before tackling the questions. I made a habit of writing out the letters (HJKLPM, etc) next to each hypothetical and crossing them off as I placed them.

Avon, Bodie, Cedric, D’Angelo, Ellis, Frank, the Greek, and Ziggy are all heading to a baseball game. They will take two cars, a Mercedes and a Nissan, subject to the following conditions:
The cars seat four people each.
D’Angelo refuses to ride with Avon. ( D -> A , A -> D )
If Cedric rides in the Mercedes, so does Ellis. ( CM -> EM , EN -> CN)
If the Greek rides in the Nissan, Ziggy rides in the Mercedes. ( GN -> ZM, ZN -> GM )

We can start diagramming, but the only rule that always appears is D -> A.

ABCD
EFGZ
M N
D/A A/D
____ ____
____ ____
____ ____


Should our setup phase end there? I don’t think so, because we have almost no useful information to use for the questions. The rules are probably not fixed in our minds at this point either. Take a minute or two to explore the effects of the other rules through a hypothetical or two.

If CM, then, EM. Remember to cross of the letters as you place them in your hypothetical.

ABCD
EFGZ
M N
D/A A/D
C ____
E ____
____ ____

Only one space remains in the Mercedes. Z and G can’t ride together in the Nissan, so one of them occupies the remaining space in the Mercedes, and the other rides in the Nissan. Our random variables B and F have no choice but to ride in the Nissan.

ABCD
EFGZ
M N
D/A A/D
C G/Z
E B
Z/G F
We’ve filled in every square! This information should prove very useful.
(If you want to write it like I would, it looks something like this:
M N
DA DA
C ZG
E B
ZG F
Diagramming this way only works if it’s clear in your mind that each spot can only be taken up by one letter. If you find this style confusing, then don’t do it. It helped me, but you should find what works best for you.)

Grouping games are often light on rules and heavy on the implications of those rules. During your “setup” time in a grouping game, it can be very beneficial to work out some of those implications. It will save time if a question asks, for instance, “If Cedric rides in the Mercedes, where does Frank ride?” Also importantly, doing this will help you keep the rules in your mind.

I have sloppy writing. Writing out your diagram sloppily will continue to hurt you throughout the entire game. After much pain and confusion on the PrepTests, I eventually discovered that my main diagram needed to be organized.

Review your mistakes and identify pitfalls to avoid. Write down those conclusions and review them prior to your next tests.

Specific advice for Logical Reasoning (LR)

Improvement in LR kind of took care of itself just by virtue of the fact that I did 35 PrepTests and thus 70 unique LR sections. If you do a similar number of PrepTests while reviewing and learning from your mistakes, you should make some nice gains.

My strategy for improvement on this section was to do the first 10 problems in 10 minutes. I struggled with that for a little while, but it gradually became second nature. Then I moved on to doing the first 15 in 15 minutes. By the end of my three month plan, I could do 20 in 20 and even 25 in 25 if I was lucky. You should definitely try to save time on the earlier questions since they tend to be much easier than the later ones. The early questions can still throw you a curveball, however, so be careful.

Don’t be afraid to skip around, but make sure you do it intelligently. I would draw a big box around the questions where I wasn't confident in my answer. I drew the box with a light line if it was a small doubt, and a dark line if it was a big doubt. I would circle questions that I didn't answer. In general I circled parallel reasoning without even looking at them because they’re best to answer last, in my opinion.

When I’d finished the last question in the section, I would go back and answer the circled questions, then look at the dark box questions until satisfied, then the light box ones. Doing this will make sure you don’t get bogged down during the section. You need to avoid spending 3 minutes agonizing over a difficult question and then losing your opportunity to answer the easier ones.

Wrong answer choices on the LR section very often contain language that is too broad or (less often) too narrow. Very commonly, if I was trying to decide between two answer choices, I could remind myself to check the scope and immediately eliminate one.

10. A greater proportion of high school students these days are lazy compared with earlier generations. Industriousness is both necessary and sufficient for academic success, and lazy students are never industrious.

Which of the following can be properly concluded, assuming the statements above are true:
(A) Blah blah blah
(B) Yada yada yada
(C) A greater proportion of high school students these days will find it impossible to succeed academically.
(D) A smaller proportion of students are industrious these days than in earlier generations.
(E) More high school students these days will not succeed in life.

Since this is question number 10 it’s still relatively easy, so we were able to quickly narrow the choices down to two. Yet, because it’s question 10, and we’re trying to finish the first ten in ten minutes, we’re moving quickly and may miss a key word or two. At first glance, D may actually appear more correct than C because its language isn’t as “strong” and it requires fewer logical steps, but I hope you noticed that D is talking about all students. C correctly limits itself to high school students.

Normally, noticing this would be enough to eliminate D, but if you want to think further, realize that there might be more industrious elementary and junior high students than in previous generations. If this was the case, it might outweigh the increase in lazy high schoolers. The moral is, pay very close attention to language indicating scope.

I do think it’s a good idea to “prephrase” the answers on LR questions. Prephrasing is guessing the answer before you’ve even seen the answer choices. This can be a great way to save time, especially on the earlier, easier questions. Still, even if you think of a perfect prephrased answer, you should be prepared to throw it away. Here is an example:

16. The only reason Don’s wife would leave him is her learning his secret identity, but she will definitely leave him if she learns it. Don values protecting his secret identity above all else, and he would never intentionally reveal it to her. Therefore, his wife will not leave him.

(At this point, perhaps you’re thinking to yourself, “What if she discovers it on her own?” You’re ready to look for that answer among the choices.)

This argument is vulnerable to the criticism that it assumes:
(A) Don will not tell his wife his secret
(B) Don is a good husband and provider
(C) His wife can find his secret on her own
(D) Don will not accidentally reveal his secret
(E) Don will not act in a suspicious manner

Excellent! Our prephrased answer was among the answer choices. Let’s select C and move on… This is the danger of prephrasing. If we find an obvious prephrased answer, we might pay less attention to the question stem, and also ignore the correct answer. C is actually the opposite of what we’d hope to find. The argument assumes Don’s wife CANNOT find his secret on her own. LR questions will often try to fool you like this.

Prephrasing is useful because, if you’d prephrased D instead, you’d have saved time and the question would have seemed extremely easy. Someone with D in mind might be able to look at C and quickly see that it’s incorrect. Prephrasing is very powerful, but you still need to be cautious when doing it.

Review your mistakes and identify pitfalls to avoid. Write down those conclusions somewhere and review them prior to your next test.

Specific advice for Reading Comprehension (RC)

RC will ask you the same types of things about the passages each time. You’ll need to know the main point, the author’s attitude, statements the author would agree with, understanding a metaphor the author used, and so on. These questions will come up again and again so experience will help you find what to look for in the passage while you’re reading it.

What helped me was realizing that all the answers should match each other. I refer to this as the “puzzle theory” of RC. If you feel confident in your "main point" answer, you can use it to answer other questions that give you difficulty. It works the other way around too. Maybe the main point is tough but you are confident in some others about "the purpose of the passage" or "author would agree with." Consider this example:

4. The author would be most likely to agree that Billy Mumphrey’s downfall was primarily caused by:
(A) love
(B) deception
(C) his support of the conservative party
(D) his abandonment by key political allies
(E) his unbridled enthusiasm

You very confidently select E. Then later, you encounter this question that you find much more difficult to answer.

7. Which of the following most accurately restates the author’s conclusion:
(A) The main character’s politics were more important than his attitude
(B) The main character’s politics and attitude were equally important
(C) The main character’s politics were less important than his attitude
(D) The main character’s politics and attitude were equally unimportant
(E) The dirty game of world diplomacy and international intrigue is unwinnable regardless of politics or attitude

You know “the main character” refers to Billy Mumphrey, and that this phrasing is simply meant to confuse you. You remember an earlier question where you had to decide between politics and attitude. You look back at number 4 see that unbridled enthusiasm had definitely been the cause of Billy Mumphrey’s downfall, and this helps you to be reasonably confident in selecting C.

I often lost points on RC in PrepTests because of boredom. You'll be ruined if you get bored. You'll also be ruined if you try to speed up, because if you feel like you’re reading very quickly, you’re probably missing important information. If I get interested in the passage and read to understand everything in it at my own pace, I can do well on it. This may vary from person to person though.

The TLS LSAT forum is quick to recommend The Economist for reading comprehension skills. This likely stems from the perception that The Economist is written using more difficult language than many other magazines. I don’t think any one magazine or book will prepare you for the reading comprehension section. It’s a good idea to read a variety of magazines like The Economist, Scientific American, Foreign Policy, The New Yorker, and others that seem like graduate degree holders subscribe to.

The RC section can cover, in any one test, topics as disparate as a 1950s German poetry movement, the evolution of birds in a small corner of the Amazon, women’s landholding rights in the Magna Carta, and the origins of Law & Wine Tasting as an academic field. Chances are you’ll find at least one of those hard to get through due to boredom, convoluted language, or unfamiliarity with the topic. Reading more in your spare time can only help. This may also have some benefit for unfamiliar topics in the LR section.

Review your mistakes and identify pitfalls to avoid . Write down those conclusions somewhere and review them prior to your next test.

More on that underlined advice

This may be the most important advice I have to offer. Doing a lot of PrepTests is an obvious method to prepare, but many people fail to review them sufficiently. I was guilty of it as well. When I sat down and thought a little more deeply about some of my mistakes in LG, for instance, I was able to identify some serious flaws in my method of attack. Here are the notes I wrote to myself over the course of those three months:

-Never take ANY section for granted
-Always make sure the answer choice fits PERFECTLY
-Be interested in every passage, game, and question
-Don't skip around on games questions if you want a -0
Instead, make a full hypothetical if stumped
-Read everything slowly enough that you don't miss anything
-5 question passages and games aren't any easier
-Grouping games, track categories on diagram
Write out letters for each problem, cross off placed ones
-One answer is 100% correct, others are 100% wrong.
If you can't see them that way, you're overlooking something.
Reread a tough problem critically if there's time. Don't rely on your memory.
-Wrong answers (esp. assumption) are often too broad. Watch scope
-GUESS INTELLIGENTLY - Letter used least within the section
-Explaining a discrepancy between two groups should show how something affects the two groups differently
-PAY ATTENTION WHEN BUBBLING! DON'T RUSH IT! BE CAREFUL!

I looked at this before I did each of my PrepTests. I also printed it out and brought it with me for test day. You might find it helpful. I definitely recommend starting with a blank page (or text file on your computer) and writing your own instructions to yourself.

Less obvious ways to prepare

It’s common sense that you would study the LSAT itself in order to prepare, but you may be able to improve your score before you’ve even seen the test, or when you’re trying to relax after a PrepTest.

Many people say that studying philosophy is good preparation for the LSAT. That’s probably true. A well rounded college education will prepare you for the reading comprehension section, at the very least. I’ve studied a bit of computer science, and I felt that was very relevant. Several of my classes were devoted to manipulating logical expressions and games, and I have no doubt that this helped me.

The classes I felt were most helpful were Discrete Mathematics (read: formal logic), Computer Architecture, Theory of Computation, and Logic Design. This list is by no means exhaustive. All of these were in the engineering department. Even within it, some were notorious for their difficulty. As such, I wouldn’t recommend taking these classes solely to improve your LSAT ability, because they may well drag your GPA down. On the other hand, if they’re already required or optional for your major, don’t blow them off if you’re entertaining the thought of law school.

In terms of your attitude, you need balance when approaching the LSAT. You won't do well if you're intimidated by the test, a section type, or question type. At the same time, you won't do well if you start to get cocky and think that the test, a section type, or question type are easy. Each and every question needs to be treated as a bomb squad member would treat a live explosive. Whether it's a hand grenade (LR question #1) or a nuclear bomb (LR question #19 parallel reasoning), they can both blow up and kill you if you're not careful. I found that I would miss questions if I fell into either extreme. Through practice you should be able to get yourself into the correct mindset.

Some people recommend studying in a place with other people such as a library. It’s definitely wise to practice somewhere with some background noise. It was inconvenient for me to go to the library, but I did practice with the window open along a noisy street. One aspect of the test you can’t control is the noise and distractions in the room, so you might as well be prepared for that.

Most administrations of the test will begin early in the morning. If you’re a night owl like me, then you should train yourself to be up and functioning at this time of day prior to the test. Start waking up early and do a PrepTest properly timed.

A psychology PhD may disagree, but it’s my understanding that it can be beneficial to study before going to sleep. If you can study before bed, I read (in Scientific American!) that your brain will reprocess and digest the information while you’re asleep. I didn’t do this, but I tried to take advantage of it the night before gameday by doing problems from each section before hitting the hay. If you start having nightmares about logic games then I would advise you to study earlier in the day.

Some people also find doing a warm up to be helpful. On test day I woke up bright and early and did about 8.5 minutes of fresh, never-before-seen problems from each section type. That meant 1 game, 1 reading passage, and every fourth LR question in a section. You can do this pretty quickly and it should help your brain switch into LSAT mode.

It goes without saying, but you need to take care of your physical well-being. Get plenty of sleep. I started going to the gym while I was studying and I honestly think it helped. Exercise is supposed to be good for your brain. If you normally eat nothing but junk food and drink soda by the case, consider investing in some healthier fuel for yourself.

Retaking

LSAC keeps track of retakers and reports that most people only improve by a few points at best. They also show that the higher your original score, the more likely you become to go down upon a retake. This means you need to be cautious when approaching a retake. If you prepare for 3 months as best you can, take the test, and score at your practice average, you should probably call it quits. Yet, if you score above 175 very consistently, and then are shocked to find a 174 on your results page, then it may actually be wise to retake even with such a high score.

If you don’t improve upon a retake, then you’ve shot yourself in the foot. On the other hand, if you can improve by even one point, then you’ve helped your application considerably. Admissions personnel expect you to improve simply through familiarity with the test, but since your highest score is the one that becomes part of the school’s statistics, the candidate with a 165 and a 166 will probably fare better than the candidate with a 165, all else being equal. I recommend reading TLS’s interviews with admissions deans for more perspective on how they view retaking.

It’s incredibly important that you use your months of practice to establish what your real ability is on the test. If you’re paying attention, you should learn your strengths, weaknesses, and strategies to score higher. You will also learn what score you can expect when you take the real thing. Using this knowledge, you can evaluate why you didn’t score as well as you expected. Was the test center noisy? Did you cut yourself some slack on practice tests without necessarily realizing it? (For instance, some people take long breaks between sections, don’t use a bubble sheet, fudge the section timing, or never practice with an experimental section.) Perhaps most importantly, did you put in as much practice as you should have?

Depending on the answers to questions like these, you can decide if and when you should retake and what you can do to ensure you do better next time. “I was unlucky” is not the right answer, because it excuses you from taking any corrective action.

Cancelling

Some proctors and testing centers can be truly atrocious. Your proctor may call time five minutes early, or chat on the phone with a microphone left on, or some other nonsense. You might also have some unimaginable personal problem. Having been kept awake with anticipation, maybe you slept through your alarm and showed up late. One TLS user claimed to have drunk two gallons of water the night before the test and severely disrupted his bowels. In these cases, the option to cancel your score may be attractive.

The decision whether to cancel or not cancel is an exercise of your judgment, and admissions staff are well aware of this. Thanks in part to US News, they have a strong incentive to look only at your highest score. Still, I think it’s only natural to view Candidate A with a 155 and a 170 in a different light from Candidate B with a cancel and a 170. When someone reads Candidate A’s file, they’d have to wonder why he didn’t cancel that first score.

The other point to consider is that Candidate A with 155, 170 likely looks better than Candidate C with 155, cancel, 170. Some schools (the top 3, for instance) state outright that they will look at your full testing record. It’s your job to make sure it reflects well on you.

If you’ve prepared properly, I believe you’ll be able to make the right decision. When I took the LSAT for the second time, an unbelievably loud protest was going on right outside the building, and it definitely affected my concentration. I felt I’d performed well and didn’t consider cancelling, though I would have had a legitimate reason to.

What they don’t tell you

Here you’ll find little bits and pieces of information that may calm your nerves or give you slightly more knowledge about the test.

I hope that you are familiar with the concept of the experimental section. You may know that it’s impossible to distinguish which section is experimental while you’re taking it. Test prep companies report, however, that the experimental section has always appeared in the first half of the test. This information is not likely to help you much, but it may demystify the test a little. On my second LSAT, RC came first, and in my morning mental fog I felt like I may have gotten a couple questions wrong. I was very relieved when RC came again in the second half of the test.

The LSAT’s last section is a writing sample. This section is unscored, but you should still try your best on it. Even if it counts for very little (or nothing) in your application package, admissions staff do have access to it and reserve the right to waitlist or reject you if you don’t take it seriously. Since it’s at the end of the test, spending your remaining energy here cannot adversely affect your score, so give it an honest go. That being said, very few people practice for it, and I certainly didn’t.

The TLS LSAT forum often gets questions about the “certifying statement” at the very beginning of the test. In it, you’re supposed to promise not to disclose the contents of the test and whatnot. The proctor says something like “Write, DO NOT PRINT, the statement.” My normal handwriting is sloppy printing, and if my life depended on writing in cursive I’d have long since perished. On both of my LSATs I optimistically started the statement in cursive and switched to sloppy printing midway through as my patience ran out. I didn’t run into any trouble. LSAC doesn’t seem to care so long as you use your normal writing, but your proctor might. If your proctor is a dictator then make sure to follow his or her instructions.

That’s it for now. If you still thirst for knowledge, head over to the TLS LSAT preparation forum.

allison34363
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby allison34363 » Tue Dec 29, 2009 3:20 pm

Good guide Ken but did you post this in the wrong place or something?

mickeymouse4509
Posts: 39
Joined: Sun Apr 05, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby mickeymouse4509 » Wed Dec 30, 2009 9:08 pm

Ken... excellent article!

pattymac
Posts: 210
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 7:44 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby pattymac » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:26 pm

Great article Ken.

I want a TLS shirt, with "K. DELEON" and a big #1 on the back made asap!

User avatar
loser148
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:19 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby loser148 » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:35 pm

I already engage in all of these activities. I did EVERYTHING you suggested (simply as part of my life on this planet) and still can't break 150. PLEASE don't tell me to re-consider my plans. I am brighter than the majority of the well-paid attorneys in my life but they have the credentials. Is there any hope?

User avatar
vanwinkle
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby vanwinkle » Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:38 pm

loser148 wrote:I am brighter than the majority of the well-paid attorneys in my life but they have the credentials.


An inability to break 150 despite extensive studying suggests otherwise.

Woozy
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby Woozy » Thu Dec 31, 2009 12:42 am

That is a good and detailed write-up. There is only one problem I saw which the author may wish to correct:

Ken wrote:10. A greater proportion of high school students these days are lazy compared with earlier generations. Industriousness is both necessary and sufficient for academic success, and lazy students are never industrious.

Which of the following can be properly concluded, assuming the statements above are true:
(A) Blah blah blah
(B) Yada yada yada
(C) A greater proportion of high school students these days will find it impossible to succeed academically.
(D) A smaller proportion of students are industrious these days than in earlier generations.
(E) More high school students these days will not succeed in life.

Since this is question number 10 it’s still relatively easy, so we were able to quickly narrow the choices down to two. Yet, because it’s question 10, and we’re trying to finish the first ten in ten minutes, we’re moving quickly and may miss a key word or two. At first glance, D may actually appear more correct than C because its language isn’t as “strong” and it requires fewer logical steps, but I hope you noticed that D is talking about all students. C correctly limits itself to high school students.


The general point of this passage is useful, but it immediately struck me that C cannot be properly inferred from the stimulus. We don't know the incidence of industriousness among non-lazy students so we cannot conclude that the population as a whole has a lower incidence of industriousness. If the last sentence were changed to read that a student is not industrious if and only if he is lazy, this problem would be solved.

allison34363
Posts: 84
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:30 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby allison34363 » Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:05 pm

Woozy wrote:That is a good and detailed write-up. There is only one problem I saw which the author may wish to correct:

Ken wrote:10. A greater proportion of high school students these days are lazy compared with earlier generations. Industriousness is both necessary and sufficient for academic success, and lazy students are never industrious.

Which of the following can be properly concluded, assuming the statements above are true:
(A) Blah blah blah
(B) Yada yada yada
(C) A greater proportion of high school students these days will find it impossible to succeed academically.
(D) A smaller proportion of students are industrious these days than in earlier generations.
(E) More high school students these days will not succeed in life.

Since this is question number 10 it’s still relatively easy, so we were able to quickly narrow the choices down to two. Yet, because it’s question 10, and we’re trying to finish the first ten in ten minutes, we’re moving quickly and may miss a key word or two. At first glance, D may actually appear more correct than C because its language isn’t as “strong” and it requires fewer logical steps, but I hope you noticed that D is talking about all students. C correctly limits itself to high school students.


The general point of this passage is useful, but it immediately struck me that C cannot be properly inferred from the stimulus. We don't know the incidence of industriousness among non-lazy students so we cannot conclude that the population as a whole has a lower incidence of industriousness. If the last sentence were changed to read that a student is not industrious if and only if he is lazy, this problem would be solved.


Picky much?

Woozy
Posts: 159
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 2:29 pm

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby Woozy » Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:02 am

allison34363 wrote:Picky much?


Yes. You could even call me a perfectionist. :?

skip james
Posts: 264
Joined: Sat Sep 19, 2009 2:53 am

Re: How I got a perfect score on the LSAT.

Postby skip james » Mon Jan 04, 2010 1:07 am

Woozy wrote:That is a good and detailed write-up. There is only one problem I saw which the author may wish to correct:

Ken wrote:10. A greater proportion of high school students these days are lazy compared with earlier generations. Industriousness is both necessary and sufficient for academic success, and lazy students are never industrious.

Which of the following can be properly concluded, assuming the statements above are true:
(A) Blah blah blah
(B) Yada yada yada
(C) A greater proportion of high school students these days will find it impossible to succeed academically.
(D) A smaller proportion of students are industrious these days than in earlier generations.
(E) More high school students these days will not succeed in life.

Since this is question number 10 it’s still relatively easy, so we were able to quickly narrow the choices down to two. Yet, because it’s question 10, and we’re trying to finish the first ten in ten minutes, we’re moving quickly and may miss a key word or two. At first glance, D may actually appear more correct than C because its language isn’t as “strong” and it requires fewer logical steps, but I hope you noticed that D is talking about all students. C correctly limits itself to high school students.


The general point of this passage is useful, but it immediately struck me that C cannot be properly inferred from the stimulus. We don't know the incidence of industriousness among non-lazy students so we cannot conclude that the population as a whole has a lower incidence of industriousness. If the last sentence were changed to read that a student is not industrious if and only if he is lazy, this problem would be solved.


i don't think that actually solves the problem. i think there's a problem in the fact that 'being lazier compared to earlier generations' doesn't necessarily entail being 'a lazy student'.

here's a parallel argument where what im talking about may be more evident:

the majority of the lakers these days are worse at dunking than the lakers of earlier years. one can succeed academically if and only if they are industrious. people who are bad at dunking aren't industrious.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bcapace, CHyde, cianchetta0, Instrumental, PantoroB, Persianlsnyc, Pozzo, SunDevil14, Tazewell and 10 guests