PT30-S2-Q10

senioritis13
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:14 pm

PT30-S2-Q10

Postby senioritis13 » Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:06 pm

I don't understand why A. is wrong. If one subject states that a majority is less than 20k (thus making the average lower than 20k), and the other subject states that the average is above 29k, how are they not disagreeing about the average salary being greater than 29k?!?

I guess I see why D. is correct, but I don't see why A. is incorrect. Any clarification on this would be much appreciated, thanks!

senioritis13
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 7:14 pm

Re: PT30-S2-Q10

Postby senioritis13 » Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:10 pm

Ehhhh nevermind lol I'm guessing the majority can be under 20k and some outliers can still skew the average above 29k. My LSAT burnout is showing.

Cambridge LSAT
Posts: 270
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:26 pm

Re: PT30-S2-Q10

Postby Cambridge LSAT » Sun Jul 14, 2013 2:23 pm

Another thing to keep in mind is that choice A generalizes about Ergon Foods as a whole, whereas the speakers' discussion is limited to the striking workers.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests