So I know that when the premise and the conclusion have the same necessary condition, you need something linking the two sufficient conditions. For example:
Premise A --> B
Conclusion C --> B
Answer: C --> A
But why is it C --> A and not A --> C?
I've been trying to figure it out but I can't get the logic behind it, forcing me to rely on a mechanistic approach without knowing why I'm getting the answers correct.
Thank you in advance!
Solving Justify the Conclusion questions
- LSAT Blog
- Posts: 1257
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 9:24 pm
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Tue May 21, 2013 11:52 am
Re: Solving Justify the Conclusion questions
Ah I should have looked at your blog first. Of course.
Thank you!
Thank you!
Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum�
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 8 guests