Page 1 of 1

DEC95 LR SECTION3

Posted: Thu Apr 11, 2013 9:17 pm
by lawschoolplease1
#11.
this problem is driving me insane....
So I think the answer choice B is the best answer.
However, I think it's a bit shaky, and I would like to nitpick.
the stimulus basically tries to set up a chain of conditionals, and the answer choice connects the dots.
However, I don't think it's quite that clear cut.
The stimulus says the increased population "would probably result in" overcrowded schools. this isn't a suff/nec. and it would need to be suff/nec for the answer choice to follow.

does anyone know what i'm missing?? :shock: :shock:

Re: DEC95 LR SECTION3

Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2013 1:14 pm
by Manhattan LSAT Noah
lawschoolplease1 wrote:#11.
this problem is driving me insane....
So I think the answer choice B is the best answer.
However, I think it's a bit shaky, and I would like to nitpick.
the stimulus basically tries to set up a chain of conditionals, and the answer choice connects the dots.
However, I don't think it's quite that clear cut.
The stimulus says the increased population "would probably result in" overcrowded schools. this isn't a suff/nec. and it would need to be suff/nec for the answer choice to follow.

does anyone know what i'm missing?? :shock: :shock:

You're missing the bit about the roads, which is a conditional relationship. The new roads definitely follow, and definitely require mo' taxes.

I did a full explanation here.

Re: DEC95 LR SECTION3

Posted: Sat Apr 13, 2013 8:44 am
by lawschoolplease1
wow. THANK YOU. :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D