DEC95 LR SECTION3 Forum

[lawschoolplease1]

#11.
this problem is driving me insane....
So I think the answer choice B is the best answer.
However, I think it's a bit shaky, and I would like to nitpick.
the stimulus basically tries to set up a chain of conditionals, and the answer choice connects the dots.
However, I don't think it's quite that clear cut.
The stimulus says the increased population "would probably result in" overcrowded schools. this isn't a suff/nec. and it would need to be suff/nec for the answer choice to follow.

does anyone know what i'm missing??

[Manhattan LSAT Noah]

#11.
this problem is driving me insane....
So I think the answer choice B is the best answer.
However, I think it's a bit shaky, and I would like to nitpick.
the stimulus basically tries to set up a chain of conditionals, and the answer choice connects the dots.
However, I don't think it's quite that clear cut.
The stimulus says the increased population "would probably result in" overcrowded schools. this isn't a suff/nec. and it would need to be suff/nec for the answer choice to follow.

does anyone know what i'm missing??

You're missing the bit about the roads, which is a conditional relationship. The new roads definitely follow, and definitely require mo' taxes.

I did a full explanation here.

[lawschoolplease1]

wow. THANK YOU.