seeking advisement regarding first LSAT diagnostic
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2013 12:03 pm
Back in December 2011, I wasnt relatively sure that I wanted to go on to law school, however, I obtained two seperate LSAT books during that time period. Now, I am a senior economics major and will graduate May 2013, and wish to attend law school. I am interested in taking the LSAT either October or December 2013, so at any rate, I have 7-9 months to prepare for the exam.
2 weeks ago, I had no familiarity with the types of questions on the LSAT and never was presented with that type of material before. I did my first diagnostic timed and the book was from 2001, titled, "Master the LSAT, includes an actual LSAT exam", I took the exam timed and scored a 140, which I realize is quite low. I tried my very best during the timed exam. Naturally, two days later, not satisfied with my score, I opened the other book that I had: "LSAT 2011. The Princeton Review", I took my timed test in that book and scored a 158.
This has lead me to a great deal of confusion, because it is very rare that in two days time, someone could score a 140 and then a 158 on exams in two seperate books. The exam book I scored the highest (158) "LSAT 2011, Princeton Review", the questions made sense to me and were quite straight forward, whereas, the book from 2001, Master the LSAT, was very confusing.
For anyone that has taken the LSAT, are the questions in the Princeton Review, similar or like the questions on the actual LSAT, or does that book contain questions simpler than on the actual LSAT? and because I have two different scores from 2 exams in 2 different books which should I count as my first diagnostic?
I apologize for the lengthy question.
2 weeks ago, I had no familiarity with the types of questions on the LSAT and never was presented with that type of material before. I did my first diagnostic timed and the book was from 2001, titled, "Master the LSAT, includes an actual LSAT exam", I took the exam timed and scored a 140, which I realize is quite low. I tried my very best during the timed exam. Naturally, two days later, not satisfied with my score, I opened the other book that I had: "LSAT 2011. The Princeton Review", I took my timed test in that book and scored a 158.
This has lead me to a great deal of confusion, because it is very rare that in two days time, someone could score a 140 and then a 158 on exams in two seperate books. The exam book I scored the highest (158) "LSAT 2011, Princeton Review", the questions made sense to me and were quite straight forward, whereas, the book from 2001, Master the LSAT, was very confusing.
For anyone that has taken the LSAT, are the questions in the Princeton Review, similar or like the questions on the actual LSAT, or does that book contain questions simpler than on the actual LSAT? and because I have two different scores from 2 exams in 2 different books which should I count as my first diagnostic?
I apologize for the lengthy question.