Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=204440
Icculus wrote:In what way did OP think it was all appropriate to place this in the LSAT prep forum?
Also:
Ludovico Technique wrote:I haven't watched any of the video but I'm gonna post anyway. You're an idiot
not interested in hearing opposing viewpoints? wake up, sheep.PromisedLand wrote:I'm not that concerned with your refutations, so I'm gonna pass on the transcript. I'm runnin' a 5k for deaf people near Gallaudet in March though, maybe you'll benefit from that.fatduck wrote:i'll make a deal with you, obvious troll OP. i can't watch your youtube video because i'm deaf. if you write out a complete transcript of the video, i'll refute all the arguments.
PromisedLand wrote:I'm runnin' a 5k for deaf people near Gallaudet in March though, maybe you'll benefit from that.
Either concerned enough to transpose 30+ minutes of video, or not concerned.fatduck wrote:not interested in hearing opposing viewpoints? wake up, sheep.PromisedLand wrote:I'm not that concerned with your refutations, so I'm gonna pass on the transcript. I'm runnin' a 5k for deaf people near Gallaudet in March though, maybe you'll benefit from that.fatduck wrote:i'll make a deal with you, obvious troll OP. i can't watch your youtube video because i'm deaf. if you write out a complete transcript of the video, i'll refute all the arguments.
Either the shooting was factual, or the government was involved in the shooting to take away our guns and eventually lead a military-style take over on its citizens where they can't defend themselves and become slaves to the stateTeflon_Don wrote:The government was involved in the shooting to take away our guns and eventually lead a military-style take over on its citizens where they can't defend themselves and become slaves to the state? Damn.
lol, I like this guy DavidBentley. He likes attention.Davidbentley wrote:PromisedLand wrote:I'm runnin' a 5k for deaf people near Gallaudet in March though, maybe you'll benefit from that.
is there something about this theory that can only be explained in an audiovisual format?PromisedLand wrote:Either concerned enough to transpose 30+ minutes of video, or not concerned.fatduck wrote:not interested in hearing opposing viewpoints? wake up, sheep.PromisedLand wrote:I'm not that concerned with your refutations, so I'm gonna pass on the transcript. I'm runnin' a 5k for deaf people near Gallaudet in March though, maybe you'll benefit from that.fatduck wrote:i'll make a deal with you, obvious troll OP. i can't watch your youtube video because i'm deaf. if you write out a complete transcript of the video, i'll refute all the arguments.
Trust me, your bark is worse than your bite.JamesDean1955 wrote:Mods, please lock this thread before I post some really offensive shit at this guy.
Is there something about any theory that can only be explained in an audiovisual format?fatduck wrote: is there something about this theory that can only be explained in an audiovisual format?
Maybe, maybe not.bandenjamin wrote:
alright, watch these videos debunking your theory. do not reply until you have watched all the videos in their entirety.PromisedLand wrote:Is there something about any theory that can only be explained in an audiovisual format?fatduck wrote: is there something about this theory that can only be explained in an audiovisual format?
i tried. OP only speaks youtube.3|ink wrote:OP,
I don't have time to watch the video. Can you tell me who orchestrated the hoax and why? Was it part of Obama's plan to take our gun rights away?
In theory, this should have worked.PromisedLand wrote:No. I think it has something to do with 'discussion'. Though the forum isn't entitled 'LSAT Prep and LSAT Discussion,' I guess I should have implied that the discussion was limited to matters concerning the LSAT.
I would move it if I could.
That isn't expressed in the video, so I'm not sure. It's not a theory that I am purporting to be factual or 'my theory' as FatDuck put it. I thought the video was interesting. Or, of course, I'm an insensitive troll.3|ink wrote:OP,
I don't have time to watch the video. Can you tell me who orchestrated the hoax and why? Was it part of Obama's plan to take our gun rights away?
they were probably teleported to the same Mars training facility where Obama was raisedMal Reynolds wrote:I watched the video. I don't think it went far enough in its assertions. Obama was behind all of it all obviously. But what about all of the missing kids? Are they being sent to some commie Jedi training school? Will they return in ten years to overthrow the proletariat?
Explain what you thought was interesting about itPromisedLand wrote:That isn't expressed in the video, so I'm not sure. It's not a theory that I am purporting to be factual or 'my theory' as FatDuck put it. I thought the video was interesting. Or, of course, I'm an insensitive troll.3|ink wrote:OP,
I don't have time to watch the video. Can you tell me who orchestrated the hoax and why? Was it part of Obama's plan to take our gun rights away?
lol, you tried to get me to transpose the entire transcript. And he asked me information beyond the video.fatduck wrote:i tried. OP only speaks youtube.3|ink wrote:OP,
I don't have time to watch the video. Can you tell me who orchestrated the hoax and why? Was it part of Obama's plan to take our gun rights away?
think of it as an assumption question then.PromisedLand wrote:lol, you tried to get me to transpose the entire transcript. And he asked me information beyond the video.fatduck wrote:i tried. OP only speaks youtube.3|ink wrote:OP,
I don't have time to watch the video. Can you tell me who orchestrated the hoax and why? Was it part of Obama's plan to take our gun rights away?
Good point.Icculus wrote:In what way did OP think it was all appropriate to place this in the LSAT prep forum?
