Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll]

LSAT Release Date

Sometime in Feb
5
3%
March 1
10
5%
March 4
49
26%
March 5
46
24%
March 6
44
23%
March 7
8
4%
March 8
5
3%
March 11
2
1%
March 12 and/or Beyond
22
12%
 
Total votes: 191

ws81086n
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby ws81086n » Fri Feb 15, 2013 9:50 pm

That's nice ^

User avatar
MS415
Posts: 48
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:02 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby MS415 » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:16 pm

How many more days? It feels like forever.

User avatar
kmc
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:22 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby kmc » Fri Feb 15, 2013 11:35 pm

MS415 wrote:How many more days? It feels like forever.

--ImageRemoved--

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:04 am

kmc wrote:
MS415 wrote:How many more days? It feels like forever.

[img]girl[/img]


Who are you?

User avatar
finnandjake2
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:41 am

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby finnandjake2 » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:13 am

This thread is boring.
Last edited by finnandjake2 on Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
kmc
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:22 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby kmc » Sat Feb 16, 2013 1:29 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:
kmc wrote:
MS415 wrote:How many more days? It feels like forever.

[img]girl[/img]


Who are you?


i'm new. i've been lurking for a bit. didn't really know how to introduce myself, but then i couldn't help posting my version of a countdown calendar.

hi folks!

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:24 am

kmc wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:
Who are you?


i'm new. i've been lurking for a bit. didn't really know how to introduce myself, but then i couldn't help posting my version of a countdown calendar.

hi folks!

I was making a joke about our avatars

User avatar
kmc
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:22 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby kmc » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:33 am

wannabelawstudent wrote:
kmc wrote:
wannabelawstudent wrote:
Who are you?


i'm new. i've been lurking for a bit. didn't really know how to introduce myself, but then i couldn't help posting my version of a countdown calendar.

hi folks!

I was making a joke about our avatars


derp. yay first day here and i've already failed!

but really, it just always wigs me out when we meet ourselves.

User avatar
OliveBC
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby OliveBC » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:15 am

Is everyone in this thread a guy? I mean I like boobs as much as the next person, but can't we balance out all the boob gifs with some David Beckham or something?

ws81086n
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby ws81086n » Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:55 am

No one's stopping you. Kudos to "Dusters" for the last post on pg 24.

User avatar
kmc
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:22 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby kmc » Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:26 am

i'm a woman. i'm just also a lesbian. so. boobs.

User avatar
OliveBC
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby OliveBC » Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:53 pm

Embarrassingly... I don't know how to use gifs :(

SicSemper
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 6:16 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby SicSemper » Sat Feb 16, 2013 3:28 pm

Image

Waiting, waiting...

netsfan05
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2011 4:12 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby netsfan05 » Sat Feb 16, 2013 4:19 pm

I had LG-LR-RC-RC-LR. I'm not sure which reading comp passage was experimental but I'm hoping it was the second

User avatar
TheThriller
Posts: 2285
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby TheThriller » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:30 am

Karate Kid is on TV.

gobosox
Posts: 240
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby gobosox » Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:23 am

Checking in after (FINALLY) taking the test yesterday. Didn't see anything on here about it, but it was quite an old test. The LG were still in the old format (1 to a page) which I thought would suck, but they were much older-type games (very very few hypotheticals). It seemed to be a test from the early 50s in terms of how it was written and question types.

LG was a cinch, 3 of the first 4 sections were LR, and I think the experimental was on the second of the 3 only because it was so odd. (And I think I got quite a few wrong in it.)

Weirdest part was that I got a question that I had literally done in my prep 2 days ago (LR, kids reactions to baseballs being thrown slow v fast). Maybe I had deja vu, but I even recognized the right answer and moved on... Not sure if I was going crazy during the test, but 99% sure I had seen that Q before, and quite recently.

Not a bad test-- RC was a bitch, but so, I hear, was the actual Feb administration...

User avatar
facile princeps
Posts: 421
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby facile princeps » Sun Feb 17, 2013 11:35 am

RC was a bitch indeed. I'm actually contemplating canceling because of that and the fact that I know I missed at least 2 questions on the last game (the first 3 games were easy). I'm thinking -4/5 on LR combined, -5/8 on that horrible RC, and -2/4 on games. Best case scenario -11 gets me a 170; worst case scenario -17 gets me less than my first score.

User avatar
chickpea
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby chickpea » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:09 pm

I also noticed some material that I had seen on my practice tests but only in the experimental section.

I really wish I hadn't had LG first since in retrospect the games were really easy and I think I could have aced them had I been more calm. I guess there's always something that doesn't go quite as planned though.

LG LR LG RC LR

LG -3/-6 (had to guess on the last two questions)
LR -1/-3
LG -0/-1
RC -1/-3
LR -1/-3

Best case scenario: 175
Worst case scenario: 166

Lol, two very different outcomes. Hoping for a 171-172 but would be happy with a 170.
Last edited by chickpea on Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
chickpea
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby chickpea » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:10 pm

facile princeps wrote:RC was a bitch indeed. I'm actually contemplating canceling because of that and the fact that I know I missed at least 2 questions on the last game (the first 3 games were easy). I'm thinking -4/5 on LR combined, -5/8 on that horrible RC, and -2/4 on games. Best case scenario -11 gets me a 170; worst case scenario -17 gets me less than my first score.


Are you applying this cycle? You may have done better than you think you did but if you're not feeling great about the test perhaps you could cancel and re-take in June?

User avatar
dusters
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 8:12 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby dusters » Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:33 pm

OliveBC wrote:Is everyone in this thread a guy? I mean I like boobs as much as the next person, but can't we balance out all the boob gifs with some David Beckham or something?

I can picwhore my puppy if that would make you feel any better.

User avatar
OliveBC
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby OliveBC » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:15 pm

dusters wrote:
OliveBC wrote:Is everyone in this thread a guy? I mean I like boobs as much as the next person, but can't we balance out all the boob gifs with some David Beckham or something?

I can picwhore my puppy if that would make you feel any better.


:D puppies are beneficial in any situation

gobosox
Posts: 240
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby gobosox » Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:19 pm

chickpea wrote:I also noticed some material that I had seen on my practice tests but only in the experimental section.

I had a bit of a stressful beginning to the test - I forgot my ID and had to get someone to rush home for me and get it. Luckily they still allowed me to take the test but I sat down right before we started the first section and was pretty frazzled during the first 35 min (logic games, which is generally my weakest section). I really wish I hadn't had LG first since in retrospect the games were really easy and I think I could have aced them had I been more calm. I guess there's always something that doesn't go quite as planned though.

LG LR LG RC LR

LG -3/-6 (had to guess on the last two questions)
LR -1/-3
LG (EXP) -0/-1
RC -1/-3
LR -1/-3

Best case scenario: 174
Worst case scenario: 165

Lol, two very different outcomes. Hoping for a 171-172 but would be happy with a 170.


Well the test had 101 questions too, if I'm not mistaken. Why would they reuse questions from old PTs in an experimental? Wouldn't that defeat the purpose?

Do you remember the ball speed question? Or the vivvy one? I think that was the experimental so if you don't remember them I may be correct

SicSemper
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 6:16 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby SicSemper » Sun Feb 17, 2013 2:50 pm

dusters wrote:
OliveBC wrote:Is everyone in this thread a guy? I mean I like boobs as much as the next person, but can't we balance out all the boob gifs with some David Beckham or something?

I can picwhore my puppy if that would make you feel any better.


Please! And what kind of puppy is it? :-)

SicSemper
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 6:16 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby SicSemper » Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:09 pm

May everyone have this much confidence while waiting for their score and thinking about the LSAT:
Image

User avatar
chickpea
Posts: 440
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: Feb Waiters (ATTENTION: Discuss LSAT Qs → BANNED)

Postby chickpea » Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:29 pm

gobosox wrote:
chickpea wrote:I also noticed some material that I had seen on my practice tests but only in the experimental section.

I had a bit of a stressful beginning to the test - I forgot my ID and had to get someone to rush home for me and get it. Luckily they still allowed me to take the test but I sat down right before we started the first section and was pretty frazzled during the first 35 min (logic games, which is generally my weakest section). I really wish I hadn't had LG first since in retrospect the games were really easy and I think I could have aced them had I been more calm. I guess there's always something that doesn't go quite as planned though.

LG LR LG RC LR

LG -3/-6 (had to guess on the last two questions)
LR -1/-3
LG (EXP) -0/-1
RC -1/-3
LR -1/-3

Best case scenario: 174
Worst case scenario: 165

Lol, two very different outcomes. Hoping for a 171-172 but would be happy with a 170.


Well the test had 101 questions too, if I'm not mistaken. Why would they reuse questions from old PTs in an experimental? Wouldn't that defeat the purpose?

Do you remember the ball speed question? Or the vivvy one? I think that was the experimental so if you don't remember them I may be correct


I don't remember the ball speed question or the vivvy one. In my experimental LG section there were definitely two LGs I had solved before (more than once). Perhaps they didn't have enough material for the experimental section. Thanks for letting me know that the test had 101 questions. Hopefully that will work in my favor.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cocotruffles and 6 guests