Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll]

LSAT Release Date

Sometime in Feb
5
3%
March 1
10
5%
March 4
49
26%
March 5
46
24%
March 6
44
23%
March 7
8
4%
March 8
5
3%
March 11
2
1%
March 12 and/or Beyond
22
12%
 
Total votes: 191

calbear123
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:15 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby calbear123 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:11 am

And I wrote on both sides of the sheet but I have pretty big handwriting.

Anyone else take it at Chapman law?

User avatar
nrand001
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 5:28 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby nrand001 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:13 am

calbear123 wrote:Anyone else find the bebop RC passage to be pretty difficult btw?

Also, just wanted to check one last time. For those of you that did NOT have LR experimental section, you don't remember the british/small knights question? It was the first one of the section so if you don't remember this it will be very very relieving for me to know that it was exp. That was one hard ass section.


It's either section 1 or 4. Pretty sure it was the 1st though, overall weird LR section and the difficulty was up there as well!

gronk
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:10 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby gronk » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:14 am

TERS wrote:Awesome. I was worried I got that canoe/rowboat one wrong.

Some chick was actually going so hard during the writing sample at my location. It was nuts. Some guy was rocking his feet and she fucking freaked on him.


Hahahaha, I would have told her "you're writing sample isn't going to make up for your utter failure on the LG section you just did".

TERS
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby TERS » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:17 am

She was just a shitty person generally. Late initially and after the break. Nice ass though.

gronk
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 5:10 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby gronk » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:19 am

TERS wrote:She was just a shitty person generally. Late initially and after the break. Nice ass though.


Maybe better luck marrying a lawyer than being one.

ws81086n
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby ws81086n » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:25 am

I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.

ws81086n
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby ws81086n » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:26 am

-8 is more acceptable, but still dumb. -9 is feasible, but pretty doubtful.

User avatar
princeR
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:10 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby princeR » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:27 am

ws81086n wrote:I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.

Does anyone really think the curve could possibly be lower than a -10? It felt like a -10, maybe -11, but a -9 would be brutal.

ws81086n
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby ws81086n » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:34 am

princeR wrote:
ws81086n wrote:I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.

Does anyone really think the curve could possibly be lower than a -10? It felt like a -10, maybe -11, but a -9 would be brutal.


It really would be. No way -9. -10 or -11. Between LR, a reasonably challenging RC, and a LG that people are slightly underestimating the difficult of, we'll make it to -10 at least.

TERS
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby TERS » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:35 am

ws, stop taking it so seriously. lol. it'll won't be worse than -9, surely

TERS
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby TERS » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:36 am

derppppp

Economist Erik
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Economist Erik » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:37 am

princeR wrote:
ws81086n wrote:I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.

Does anyone really think the curve could possibly be lower than a -10? It felt like a -10, maybe -11, but a -9 would be brutal.


There hasn't been a -9 or lower since October of '08, and I definitely think there have been easier tests since that time. My guess is that it's very likely to be either -10 or -11.

ws81086n
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby ws81086n » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:42 am

Economist Erik wrote:
princeR wrote:
ws81086n wrote:I still am truly baffled by all the assholes who voted -7. Asinine.

Does anyone really think the curve could possibly be lower than a -10? It felt like a -10, maybe -11, but a -9 would be brutal.


There hasn't been a -9 or lower since October of '08, and I definitely think there have been easier tests since that time. My guess is that it's very likely to be either -10 or -11.


seconded

User avatar
PickMe!
Posts: 162
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:24 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby PickMe! » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:42 am

mod edit

TERS
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby TERS » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:46 am

mod edit

User avatar
TheJanitor6203
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby TheJanitor6203 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 1:56 am

+14 is what I'm hoping for. I'm shooting for a 165 and I figure I can about 21 and hit that and I'm guessing I missed 21 exactly so here's to hoping..

TookDaBait
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:13 am

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby TookDaBait » Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:17 am

All right, my two cents on this test. I did all the tests from ~40 on.

I think it's going to be around -11. The RC first section was difficult and so was the 26 question LR section.

I'm shooting for a 169 to 170 and I think my scores will correspond to a score around the upper 160s.

My predictions:
LR 1 (26Q) : 22
LR 2 (25Q): 23
RC (27Q): 22
LG (23Q): 22
--------------------------

User avatar
eav1277
Posts: 375
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby eav1277 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:30 am

mod edit
Last edited by eav1277 on Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:37 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
eav1277
Posts: 375
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby eav1277 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:32 am

mod edit
Last edited by eav1277 on Sun Feb 10, 2013 4:04 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
princeR
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:10 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby princeR » Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:37 am

mod edit

User avatar
eav1277
Posts: 375
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2012 9:58 am

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby eav1277 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:39 am

mod edit

User avatar
TheJanitor6203
Posts: 811
Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby TheJanitor6203 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:48 am

mod edit

User avatar
princeR
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:10 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby princeR » Sun Feb 10, 2013 3:56 am

mod edit

User avatar
finnandjake2
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:41 am

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby finnandjake2 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:13 am

mod edit

User avatar
Jcastro1
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 6:45 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Jcastro1 » Sun Feb 10, 2013 10:29 am

mod edit FTW




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: addie1412 and 6 guests