Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll]

LSAT Release Date

Sometime in Feb
5
3%
March 1
10
5%
March 4
49
26%
March 5
46
24%
March 6
44
23%
March 7
8
4%
March 8
5
3%
March 11
2
1%
March 12 and/or Beyond
22
12%
 
Total votes: 191

TERS
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby TERS » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:43 pm

I'm trying, really hard, to not break down and start ranting about how much I hate LSAC. Stay Strong, TERS. Stay Strong

User avatar
TheMostDangerousLG
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby TheMostDangerousLG » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:44 pm

TERS wrote:I'm trying, really hard, to not break down and start ranting about how much I hate LSAC. Stay Strong, TERS. Stay Strong


Please do! I could use an amusing and/or cathartic read right about now.

gobosox
Posts: 240
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby gobosox » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:46 pm

I'm not refreshing the LSAC page anymore. I'm counting on y'all to let me know when it happens. I'm sure it'll be simultaneous...

aresdude
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:36 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby aresdude » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:47 pm

if only it were this easy http://imgur.com/fS3qqMv
Last edited by aresdude on Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

JDot
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:41 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby JDot » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:47 pm

I had 3 LR sections, I'm just PRAYING the first was the experimental....gimme my damn score!

User avatar
MarkinKansasCity
Posts: 10955
Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:18 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby MarkinKansasCity » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:48 pm

Wormfather wrote:
MarkinKansasCity wrote:
In October they went grey at midnight, and were released 17 hours later. Granted, LSAC missed the deadline, so that was probably some kind of automated software thing. The scores usually start coming out about an hour after the icons go grey.


The icons go grey the minute the score release date matches the current date. The first outward sign that scores are coming is when someone goes into the system and changes the score release date.

And Mark, they went grey at midnight Nov 1st, we received them Nov. 2nd, it was 41 hours later, dont minimize what we all went through that week.


Sorry Worm. My mistake. I think the fact that I was incredibly drunk for those 41 hours may have affected my memory. :lol:

gobosox
Posts: 240
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby gobosox » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:49 pm

JDot wrote:I had 3 LR sections, I'm just PRAYING the first was the experimental....gimme my damn score!


I was in the makeup and had 3 LR too, I think the consensus was that the 2nd one was experimental, which I hope for because I didn't do well on that one...

Not sure if that all applies to you...

User avatar
TheMostDangerousLG
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby TheMostDangerousLG » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:52 pm

Am I the only person who thinks it's weird that green means bad and grey means good on LSAC? You'd think it'd be the reverse. Gray, boring, waiting.. green means go! Scores! Yay! .... except that's not the case.

JDot
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2012 2:41 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby JDot » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:53 pm

gobosox wrote:
JDot wrote:I had 3 LR sections, I'm just PRAYING the first was the experimental....gimme my damn score!


I was in the makeup and had 3 LR too, I think the consensus was that the 2nd one was experimental, which I hope for because I didn't do well on that one...

Not sure if that all applies to you...

--------------------------

my 1st LR was 26 questions, my 2nd was 25, and my 3rd was 26....so I'm pretty positive that means my 2nd LR was real and the 1st or 3rd was experimental

User avatar
TheMostDangerousLG
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby TheMostDangerousLG » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:54 pm

JDot wrote:
gobosox wrote:
JDot wrote:I had 3 LR sections, I'm just PRAYING the first was the experimental....gimme my damn score!


I was in the makeup and had 3 LR too, I think the consensus was that the 2nd one was experimental, which I hope for because I didn't do well on that one...

Not sure if that all applies to you...

--------------------------

my 1st LR was 26 questions, my 2nd was 25, and my 3rd was 26....so I'm pretty positive that means my 2nd LR was real and the 1st or 3rd was experimental


Yeah, we worked out that the real were 25 and 26, so at least one of your 26s was experimental.

law1992
Posts: 87
Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby law1992 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:55 pm

So no Feb score today? Phaaaack...

aresdude
Posts: 150
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 2:36 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby aresdude » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:55 pm

law1992 wrote:So no Feb score today? Phaaaack...



we won't know until like 5pm

User avatar
TheMostDangerousLG
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby TheMostDangerousLG » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:57 pm

aresdude wrote:
law1992 wrote:So no Feb score today? Phaaaack...



we won't know until like 5pm


Five hours... :shock:

gobosox
Posts: 240
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby gobosox » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:59 pm

But for the makeup test... Is it the 2nd section? I remember thinking it was for some reason.

User avatar
TheMostDangerousLG
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby TheMostDangerousLG » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:02 pm

gobosox wrote:But for the makeup test... Is it the 2nd section? I remember thinking it was for some reason.


Word on the street that it isn't dependent on what section.. i.e., you could have received your experimental LR first, while someone else received it during the second. The orders of the tests are all switched up.

gobosox
Posts: 240
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2011 8:28 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby gobosox » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:05 pm

TheMostDangerousLG wrote:
gobosox wrote:But for the makeup test... Is it the 2nd section? I remember thinking it was for some reason.


Word on the street that it isn't dependent on what section.. i.e., you could have received your experimental LR first, while someone else received it during the second. The orders of the tests are all switched up.


Balls.

If that was the real one, thats an extra -3... Easily could bring me down below 170 on its own.

User avatar
TheMostDangerousLG
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby TheMostDangerousLG » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:08 pm

gobosox wrote:
TheMostDangerousLG wrote:
gobosox wrote:But for the makeup test... Is it the 2nd section? I remember thinking it was for some reason.


Word on the street that it isn't dependent on what section.. i.e., you could have received your experimental LR first, while someone else received it during the second. The orders of the tests are all switched up.


Balls.

If that was the real one, thats an extra -3... Easily could bring me down below 170 on its own.


Well, you kicked ass in preptests. I'm sure if you think one LR section was particularly bad, it was likely your experimental.

I'm hoping the same logic applies to my potential experimental. The one thing I was pretty good at during practice tests was LR; if the section where I was totally lost on a few wasn't experimental, I'm screwed!

User avatar
jvincent11
Posts: 207
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2013 1:38 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby jvincent11 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:19 pm

gobosox wrote:
TheMostDangerousLG wrote:
gobosox wrote:But for the makeup test... Is it the 2nd section? I remember thinking it was for some reason.


Word on the street that it isn't dependent on what section.. i.e., you could have received your experimental LR first, while someone else received it during the second. The orders of the tests are all switched up.


Balls.

If that was the real one, thats an extra -3... Easily could bring me down below 170 on its own.


Well if -3 brings you below 170 on its own that's a -2 curve. Let's hope that's not the case.

User avatar
TheMostDangerousLG
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby TheMostDangerousLG » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:19 pm

jvincent11 wrote:
gobosox wrote:
TheMostDangerousLG wrote:
gobosox wrote:But for the makeup test... Is it the 2nd section? I remember thinking it was for some reason.


Word on the street that it isn't dependent on what section.. i.e., you could have received your experimental LR first, while someone else received it during the second. The orders of the tests are all switched up.


Balls.

If that was the real one, thats an extra -3... Easily could bring me down below 170 on its own.


Well if -3 brings you below 170 on its own that's a -2 curve. Let's hope that's not the case.


Just the words "-2 curve" are enough to make me shudder.

bruin91
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby bruin91 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:20 pm

-10 for a 160. lol

poiu
Posts: 32
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 3:31 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby poiu » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:22 pm

just got off the phone with lsac, they said the curve would be -5 and to check again, the release date is 3/6/14

User avatar
TheMostDangerousLG
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby TheMostDangerousLG » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:24 pm

poiu wrote:just got off the phone with lsac, they said the curve would be -5 and to check again, the release date is 3/6/14


This is horribly cruel, but I still laughed.

jvsj
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 6:38 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby jvsj » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:25 pm

poiu wrote:just got off the phone with lsac, they said the curve would be -5 and to check again, the release date is 3/6/14


Nice.
Last edited by jvsj on Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Arcticlynx
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2013 4:36 pm

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby Arcticlynx » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:26 pm

poiu wrote:just got off the phone with lsac, they said the curve would be -5 and to check again, the release date is 3/6/14


367 Days Guys, I hope ya'll brought a snack.

User avatar
OliveBC
Posts: 490
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 9:41 am

Re: Feb Waiters: LSAC.org ragequit [New Poll]

Postby OliveBC » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:30 pm

poiu wrote:just got off the phone with lsac, they said the curve would be -5 and to check again, the release date is 3/6/14


so not funny




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: blumodernist, BobBoblaw, Majestic-12 [Bot], NavyNuke, packerboy31489, proteinshake, Yahoo [Bot] and 23 guests