Feb Waiters: is TODAY the DAY? [New Poll]

LSAT Release Date

Sometime in Feb
5
3%
March 1
10
5%
March 4
49
26%
March 5
46
24%
March 6
44
23%
March 7
8
4%
March 8
5
3%
March 11
2
1%
March 12 and/or Beyond
22
12%
 
Total votes: 191

cmlarsen
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 3:34 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby cmlarsen » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:17 pm

eav1277 wrote:So drinking, bonfire, target practice, sleeping? What does everyone have planned?


To quote the incomparable LMFAO: "Shots, shot, shots, shots, shots."

KFV
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:10 am

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby KFV » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:20 pm

I know LR3 had 25 and LR1 had 26... I think LR2 had 25 but I'm not 100% sure.

ws81086n
Posts: 318
Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2012 9:47 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby ws81086n » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:21 pm

there were two 25's, for sure. i had 26-25-25

Whatsup123
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Whatsup123 » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:23 pm

mod edit

Bjorn
Posts: 13
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 4:41 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Bjorn » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:26 pm

mod edit
Last edited by Bjorn on Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:27 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
gaud
Posts: 5790
Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:58 am

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby gaud » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:26 pm

Good luck y'all

User avatar
syr1990
Posts: 47
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2012 9:49 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby syr1990 » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:31 pm

LSLovely173 wrote:
ws81086n wrote:Are the people voting -7 serious or just being assholes? I'll be the first to say I think we're looking at a tight curve, but -7 is an absurd projection. Range is definitely -9 to -12, 10 and 11 being the most likely, with 10 more likely than 11.


Curves and percentiles aren't broadcasted to us for the Feb test, right?


Can the schools that see the score see the percentile?

KFV
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 8:10 am

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby KFV » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:32 pm

mod edit

God damn. Then I was fretting over nothing during the LG. If I don't get -0 on that LG I will never forgive myself as long as I live...

Whatsup123
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Whatsup123 » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:33 pm

mod edit

Instinctive
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 11:23 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Instinctive » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:34 pm

mod edit

Whatsup123
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Whatsup123 » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:35 pm

Haha KFV, I did the same thing during LG. I was so frazzled by that last LR.

User avatar
twenty
Posts: 3153
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby twenty » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:47 pm

This was a solid test. I wish June and October had been more like this one.

User avatar
facile princeps
Posts: 421
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 8:51 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby facile princeps » Sat Feb 09, 2013 6:58 pm

I'll be joining the wait as soon as LSAC figures out a make-up test date for us folks who were affected by the storm. Good luck, waiters!

TERS
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby TERS » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:08 pm

For those with LR-RC-LR-LR-LG, have we come to a conclusion about the experimental? Was it the third or fourth?

Throttle
Posts: 100
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 7:24 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Throttle » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:19 pm

Michigan1442 wrote:I had 3 LR..LR-RC-LR-LR-LG

Hoping the first LR (26) was experimental. The second LR (25) was oddly easy so with my luck that is prob the experimental.


Nah first LR had to be experimental, those were the worst written pieces of garbage.

bogydog
Posts: 26
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 10:24 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby bogydog » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:20 pm

I'm so jealous of people who got 2 logic games or 3 LR instead of 2 RC's! My brain was fried after the first RC...two games would have been awesome.

I had RC-LR-RC-LG-LR...seems like the general consensus is the meme section was experimental? I had that hunch so strongly after reading the first paragraph of the second RC I actually considered just relaxing but on top of realizing how dumb that would be, I didn't want to mess up the experiment's results in any way...

Economist Erik
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Economist Erik » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:25 pm

.
Last edited by Economist Erik on Sat Feb 09, 2013 10:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
princeR
Posts: 308
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:10 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby princeR » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:25 pm

I had LR/RC/LR-LR/LG:

LR1: I agree with the consensus that this was definitely harder than the other two, but unfortunately it was also probably a real one.
RC: Not too difficult. Got to the last passage with 6 minutes left and was feeling pretty worried. However, that last paragraph really brought the whole thing together and made it very clear what the purpose of the passage was... does anyone else agree?
LR2/3: Both were REALLY easy. Felt great about both of them
LG: Felt great about the games.

Thinking that this was a -10 curve and I'm looking at anywhere between a 165-175 depending on that first LR and the last 2 passages of the RC.

Erik: I did not have a question about decaff. coffee.

Economist Erik
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Economist Erik » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:27 pm

.
Last edited by Economist Erik on Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Whatsup123
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Whatsup123 » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:27 pm

The 1st LR was real (26 questions), unless your sections were in a diff order and/or you had two LRs with 26 questions.

LR(26)-RC-LR(25) LR(25)-LG

My 2nd LR was easy, pretty sure the 3rd LR was experimental (4th section). But they could def have been in different orders for diff people.

whisky
Posts: 27
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby whisky » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:29 pm

princeR wrote:
Erik: I did not have a question about decaff. coffee.


This makes me feel much better about this test

Whatsup123
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Whatsup123 » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:31 pm

mod edit

Whatsup123
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2013 5:04 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Whatsup123 » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:32 pm

Yeah I remember now. mod edit

User avatar
whosonfirst
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:48 am

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby whosonfirst » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:33 pm

LR (26)-RC-LR(25)/LR(25)-LG

Ughhh my first LR was god-awful. I kept finding myself reading things twice, three times and then it'd be like "What is this saying???" and trying to move on to the answers just to get a hint of understanding. Ended up guessing on last four questions. Worst I've ever done. Killed my mojo for the rest of the test. 2nd was lots better and 3rd was easiest. Either I was awake by then or finally getting out of my own way. -8 or 9 total

RC wasn't too bad but agree that bebop was hardest of passages. chemical one was easy-average. 0 to -2

LG was easy but I still effed up the last game (buying books); had 5 minutes for last 4 questions and wasted it on bad diagramming. -2 for sure.

On the other hand, at least I wasn't the girl who got a misconduct violation for taking extra time or the guy who didn't have a photo for the ticket so went and cut up his passport for its photo...

Economist Erik
Posts: 39
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:05 pm

Re: Feb Waiters

Postby Economist Erik » Sat Feb 09, 2013 7:33 pm

.
Last edited by Economist Erik on Sat Feb 09, 2013 11:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests