One more question for lsat instructors

TERS
Posts: 161
Joined: Thu May 24, 2012 11:29 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby TERS » Mon Dec 31, 2012 6:56 pm

Shmoopy wrote:Can we agree that great majority is more than majority?


No.

User avatar
dingbat
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby dingbat » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:06 pm

A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A wrote:Its a great majority number butwe don`t know 500 000 of what?it could be 1000 000 or600 000more nice to people,its easier tocriticize someone than to see your ownshortcomings,lol

It's deja vu all over again

User avatar
dingbat
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby dingbat » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:10 pm

Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)

User avatar
Cobretti
Posts: 2560
Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby Cobretti » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:12 pm

dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

No, but I am a real asshole in real life.


dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)

natashka85
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby natashka85 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:21 pm

dingbat wrote:mrizza reminded me
natashka85 wrote:That`s not what u were saying before,i am glad u came to terms and after this i would recommend you to be more nice to people,its easier to criticize someone than to see your own shortcomings,lol

I spend enough time being nice to people, but sometimes it's better to be brutal. Coddling is for babies, not for adults, and if you can't take being criticized, I strongly urge you not to become a lawyer (or to enter any of the "professional" fields, for that matter).

As for my own shortcomings, I'm well aware of them, and I do my best to arrange my life around them, which is something I suggest you work on.

U just checked u are wrong,majority is most,great majority is not most,so u are an asshole,I always thought LSAT instructors are smart,but in your case it doesn't have to be the case,I even doubt that u are an instructor at all.

User avatar
Shmoopy
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:52 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby Shmoopy » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:22 pm

TERS wrote:
Shmoopy wrote:Can we agree that great majority is more than majority?


No.


I guess I should specify that I am referring to situations where one of those terms is more appropriate than the other. Any great majority could also be called a majority, sure... But the difference in usage lies in the fact that great majority refers to majorities that are larger than majorities that couldn't be called great majorities.

Great majority still implies most regardless.

natashka85
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby natashka85 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:25 pm

[quote="mrizza"]Guys we tried... I think its clearly time to abandon ship and leave Natashka85 to his/her 150.[/quote.
U are an asshole too,save that 150 for you,u probably are not an instructor too

User avatar
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:26 pm

natashka85 wrote:U just checked u are wrong,majority is most,great majority is not most,so u are an asshole,I always thought LSAT instructors are smart,but in your case it doesn't have to be the case,I even doubt that u are an instructor at all.


I guess it's settled then.

natashka85
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby natashka85 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:27 pm

Shmoopy wrote:
TERS wrote:
Shmoopy wrote:Can we agree that great majority is more than majority?


No.


I guess I should specify that I am referring to situations where one of those terms is more appropriate than the other. Any great majority could also be called a majority, sure... But the difference in usage lies in the fact that great majority refers to majorities that are larger than majorities that couldn't be called great majorities.

Great majority still implies most regardless.

Wrong ,great majority is not most ,this question was for LSAT instructors not for those who studies for the LSAT

User avatar
Shmoopy
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:52 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby Shmoopy » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:28 pm

A great majority of the people in this thread are LSAT instructors, but most are not.

natashka85
Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:29 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby natashka85 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:31 pm

Shmoopy wrote:A great majority of the people in this thread are LSAT instructors, but most are not.

Nice try,which one of the following weakens an argument,lol

User avatar
Shmoopy
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:52 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby Shmoopy » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:36 pm

natashka85 wrote:
Shmoopy wrote:A great majority of the people in this thread are LSAT instructors, but most are not.

Nice try,which one of the following weakens an argument,lol


Probably most of the following.
Last edited by Shmoopy on Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:39 pm

natashka85 wrote:
Shmoopy wrote:
TERS wrote:
Shmoopy wrote:Can we agree that great majority is more than majority?


No.


I guess I should specify that I am referring to situations where one of those terms is more appropriate than the other. Any great majority could also be called a majority, sure... But the difference in usage lies in the fact that great majority refers to majorities that are larger than majorities that couldn't be called great majorities.

Great majority still implies most regardless.

Wrong ,great majority is not most ,this question was for LSAT instructors not for those who studies for the LSAT


Wrong. The majority of people here came to TLS for instruction, and most of those will in turn try to instruct people like you until you call them assholes.

Ph297
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:44 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby Ph297 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:41 pm

dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)


Again, easy to talk like that on a fucking message board. What do u mean by asshole anyway, buddy? What, do u not recycle? Ur a fucking loser that posts 50 times a day on a law school message board

User avatar
A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A
Posts: 628
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:32 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby A → B ⊨ ¬B → ¬A » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:44 pm

Ph297 wrote:
dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)


Again, easy to talk like that on a fucking message board. What do u mean by asshole anyway, buddy? What, do u not recycle? Ur a fucking loser that posts 50 times a day on a law school message board


Chill, dude. This is starting to just clutter the on topic feed.

User avatar
dingbat
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby dingbat » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:51 pm

natashka85 wrote:Wrong ,great majority is not most ,this question was for LSAT instructors not for those who studies for the LSAT
No matter how often you repeat it, it's still wrong.
Majority is definitely most. It is not linguistically possible for great majority to not be most.

User avatar
dingbat
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby dingbat » Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:52 pm

Ph297 wrote:
dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)


Again, easy to talk like that on a fucking message board. What do u mean by asshole anyway, buddy? What, do u not recycle? Ur a fucking loser that posts 50 times a day on a law school message board
yeah, I'm a loser. So what?
also, like I said, happy to meet you if you have issues - just not willing to go out of my way for it. You ever in NY?

Ph297
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:44 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby Ph297 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:09 pm

dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:
dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)


Again, easy to talk like that on a fucking message board. What do u mean by asshole anyway, buddy? What, do u not recycle? Ur a fucking loser that posts 50 times a day on a law school message board
yeah, I'm a loser. So what?
also, like I said, happy to meet you if you have issues - just not willing to go out of my way for it. You ever in NY?


Actually yes, I'm coming to look at nyu this weekend.

User avatar
dingbat
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby dingbat » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:13 pm

Ph297 wrote:
dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)
Actually yes, I'm coming to look at nyu this weekend.

Class doesn't start up again until the 14th. But if you want to detour through Jersey, I'm ok with that.

edit: basically, I'm not gonna pay tolls just to deal with this bull shit

User avatar
Merylian
Posts: 659
Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:46 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby Merylian » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:20 pm

I want to applaud everyone who has attempted to have a rational discussion with OP. Anyone who can comprehend what s/he is saying well enough to take a stab at a reply deserves a gold star and a flawless RC score. Between the arbitrary comma placement, abbreviated words, etc., I have yet to be able to decipher a single statement with 100% confidence of what s/he meant. It almost feels like the October !Kung experience.

....LSAC? Is that you?

User avatar
suralin
better than you
Posts: 15038
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby suralin » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:24 pm

Ph297 wrote:
dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)


Again, easy to talk like that on a fucking message board. What do u mean by asshole anyway, buddy? What, do u not recycle? Ur a fucking loser that posts 50 times a day on a law school message board


Tip: You'll go further in life if you say "you're" instead of "ur"; the latter makes you look like an idiot.
Last edited by suralin on Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Ph297
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:44 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby Ph297 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:28 pm

Suralin wrote:
Ph297 wrote:
dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)


Again, easy to talk like that on a fucking message board. What do u mean by asshole anyway, buddy? What, do u not recycle? Ur a fucking loser that posts 50 times a day on a law school message board


Tip: You'll go further in life if you say "your" instead of "ur"; the latter makes you look like an idiot.


It would have been you're, moron. You'll also go further in life if ur not a douchebag who takes the time to correct grammar on a message board.

User avatar
suralin
better than you
Posts: 15038
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby suralin » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:33 pm

Ph297 wrote:
Suralin wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Again, easy to talk like that on a fucking message board. What do u mean by asshole anyway, buddy? What, do u not recycle? Ur a fucking loser that posts 50 times a day on a law school message board


Tip: You'll go further in life if you say "your" instead of "ur"; the latter makes you look like an idiot.


It would have been you're, moron. You'll also go further in life if ur not a douchebag who takes the time to correct grammar on a message board.


Touche. Why so mad though? :lol:

Ph297
Posts: 55
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 8:44 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby Ph297 » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:34 pm

dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:
dingbat wrote:
Ph297 wrote:Yeah real easy to be brutal when ur on a message board. I'm sure ur a real hard ass in real life too.

Just to get back to this, I'm happy to meet you any time that doesn't inconvenience me anywhere that doesn't require me to travel very far, if you really feel the need to come to the lady's defense (assuming she is a lady)
Actually yes, I'm coming to look at nyu this weekend.

Class doesn't start up again until the 14th. But if you want to detour through Jersey, I'm ok with that.

edit: basically, I'm not gonna pay tolls just to deal with this bull shit


Hahaha this is so absurd and a perfect example of the bullshit that gets thrown around on these boards. "I'm not gonna pay tolls to deal with asshole, I mean, I could show him what's up and kick his ass but I'm not gonna pay TOLLS." Such a tough guy.

User avatar
dingbat
Posts: 4976
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm

Re: One more question for lsat instructors

Postby dingbat » Mon Dec 31, 2012 8:34 pm

Ph297 wrote: You'll also go further in life if ur not a douchebag who takes the time to correct grammar on a message board.

Says the person who wants to pick a fight with a random person on a message board for a perceived slight to another random person on a message board




Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bearedman8, Bing [Bot], cherrygalore, dontsaywhatyoumean, govlife, jagerbom79, lagavulinjoe, Smortensen, Tazewell and 24 guests