'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
 Zeta
 Posts: 70
 Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:33 pm
'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
is there any difference in the diagramming of the two?
 jump_man
 Posts: 188
 Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 12:05 am
Re: 'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
Zeta wrote:is there any difference in the diagramming of the two?
Why don't you try it out and see if you get to the same answer (ideally, the correct answer)
 Zeta
 Posts: 70
 Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:33 pm
Re: 'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
I get the same answer.
A <> B
A <> B
 TheMostDangerousLG
 Posts: 1545
 Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: 'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
Zeta wrote:I get the same answer.
A <> B
Maybe it would be useful if you try thinking of "if and only if" in terms of two distinct statements. So for example, "A if and only if B" can be seen as "A if B" AND "A only if B" (which is functionally equivalent to "but only if"). If you try diagramming them, you should see the difference in the relationship:
"A if and only if B" = "A if B" and "A only if B":
1. "A if B" (which is of course equivalent to "if B, then A"): B > A
2. "A only if B": ~ B > ~ A
And then the contrapositive of the second statement being A > B, you can see how it combines with the first statement to form the statement you posted, A <> B.
The difference between that and "A but only if B" is that B does not necessarily "trigger" A. You know that if you have A, you must also have B ("but only if"), but you don't necessarily know the opposite to be true. So it would just be written as: A > B. And from there the contrapositive, ~ B > ~ A (if not B, then you can't have A). But knowing that you have B does not imply that you have A (as in the first statement above / "A if B").
TL;DR: "A if and only if B" = A <> B, "A but only if B" = "A > B".
Gah, that was terribly longwinded, sorry! Middle of an allnighter = tired rambling.

 Posts: 53
 Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:53 pm
Re: 'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
OP,
I just want to clarify, since I believe the above poster missed a key word in your original question. (The above poster was discussing X, but only if Y  leaving out the crucial "if" immediately before the "but.")
If you're told "X if, and only if, Y"... this is EXACTLY the same as being told "X if, but only if, Y."
In both cases, Y is both sufficient to guarantee X (because of the "if") and necessary for X (because of the "only if"). So you get two pieces of Formal Logic for the price of one:
X > Y
Y > X
And, of course, both contrapositives are also valid. Some people like to use the double arrow notation (X <> Y), but that's a personal decision.
Hope this helps.
 Chris
I just want to clarify, since I believe the above poster missed a key word in your original question. (The above poster was discussing X, but only if Y  leaving out the crucial "if" immediately before the "but.")
If you're told "X if, and only if, Y"... this is EXACTLY the same as being told "X if, but only if, Y."
In both cases, Y is both sufficient to guarantee X (because of the "if") and necessary for X (because of the "only if"). So you get two pieces of Formal Logic for the price of one:
X > Y
Y > X
And, of course, both contrapositives are also valid. Some people like to use the double arrow notation (X <> Y), but that's a personal decision.
Hope this helps.
 Chris

 Posts: 695
 Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:18 am
Re: 'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
KaplanLSATInstructor wrote:OP,
I just want to clarify, since I believe the above poster missed a key word in your original question. (The above poster was discussing X, but only if Y  leaving out the crucial "if" immediately before the "but.")
If you're told "X if, and only if, Y"... this is EXACTLY the same as being told "X if, but only if, Y."
In both cases, Y is both sufficient to guarantee X (because of the "if") and necessary for X (because of the "only if"). So you get two pieces of Formal Logic for the price of one:
X > Y
Y > X
And, of course, both contrapositives are also valid. Some people like to use the double arrow notation (X <> Y), but that's a personal decision.
Hope this helps.
 Chris
^^^ what he said (want to clarify because the poster two above missed it)
"And" and "But" have the same logical content, but the word "but" serves as a prelude to the second clause of a sentence, indicating that it will qualify the first clause.
It would be very strange to use say "a gun will shoot if but only if it has a bullet in it." It should be "a gun will shoot if and only if it has a bullet in it."
Using "but" here makes little sense because there's no definitive content preceding the "but" that would need qualification, thanks to the first "if."
 scottyc66
 Posts: 717
 Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:19 pm
Re: 'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
Zeta wrote:is there any difference in the diagramming of the two?
Tons of responses and text to a very simple question, they're the same

 Posts: 110
 Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 12:10 pm
Re: 'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
scottyc66 wrote:Zeta wrote:is there any difference in the diagramming of the two?
Tons of responses and text to a very simple question, they're the same
LOL. I was going to say that. No difference between the two.
 TheMostDangerousLG
 Posts: 1545
 Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: 'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
BeenDidThat wrote:KaplanLSATInstructor wrote:OP,
I just want to clarify, since I believe the above poster missed a key word in your original question. (The above poster was discussing X, but only if Y  leaving out the crucial "if" immediately before the "but.")
If you're told "X if, and only if, Y"... this is EXACTLY the same as being told "X if, but only if, Y."
In both cases, Y is both sufficient to guarantee X (because of the "if") and necessary for X (because of the "only if"). So you get two pieces of Formal Logic for the price of one:
X > Y
Y > X
And, of course, both contrapositives are also valid. Some people like to use the double arrow notation (X <> Y), but that's a personal decision.
Hope this helps.
 Chris
^^^ what he said (want to clarify because the poster two above missed it)
"And" and "But" have the same logical content, but the word "but" serves as a prelude to the second clause of a sentence, indicating that it will qualify the first clause.
It would be very strange to use say "a gun will shoot if but only if it has a bullet in it." It should be "a gun will shoot if and only if it has a bullet in it."
Using "but" here makes little sense because there's no definitive content preceding the "but" that would need qualification, thanks to the first "if."
Oh geez, you're right! Feel like an idiot; sorry for the useless post. (Shall hereby refrain from posting in the middle of the night without sufficient caffeine.)
 Zeta
 Posts: 70
 Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:33 pm
Re: 'if AND only if' VS 'if BUT only if'
i appreciate the explanations a lot. they help a lot more than just, 'they're the same.'
Return to “LSAT Prep and Discussion Forum”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests